Tweet
WHY WAS NALBANDYAN NOT SMILING?
http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/politics-lra hos15534.html
11:42:07 - 14/10/2009
According to the assessment of the Republican press speaker Edward
Sharmazanov, after the signing of the Armenian-Turkish protocols
the Turkish foreign minister Davutoglu was smiling form anger. If we
follow Sharmazanov's logic, so the dark and cold face of the Armenian
foreign minister Edward Nalbandyan expressed his happiness. Moreover,
if we follow this logic, we may presume that Edward Nalbandyan seeing
that Davutoglu was smiling from anger decided that he had to have an
angry face expression to express his happiness for people thinking
like Sharmazanov not to think that he was as angry as Davutoglu. It
is not ruled out either that Davutoglu saw the darkened face from
happiness of Nalbandyan and started smiling from anger. No doubt,
Chouchner, Clinton and a little Lavrov were angry too who were smiling
like Davutoglu. And the CoE commissioner Javier Solana apparently was
in stress and wanted to feel some happiness on Nalbandyan's cold and
dark face.
The question is that there are people looking at whose faces you are
able to understand something though wrongly, but there are others
looking at whose faces you cannot even understand anything wrongly
because their thoughts are quite understandable. In addition, within
the Armenian government, such people are the complete majority. This
is the reason why a normal and grounded explanation of their own steps
is from the sphere of fantasy for the Armenian government which is
the reason why so important situations are explained with such simple
words like if Azeris are dissatisfied so we have to be content. But if
Davutoglu is smiling from anger, Aliyev is not smiling from happiness
just like Edward Nalbandyan.
http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/politics-lra hos15534.html
11:42:07 - 14/10/2009
According to the assessment of the Republican press speaker Edward
Sharmazanov, after the signing of the Armenian-Turkish protocols
the Turkish foreign minister Davutoglu was smiling form anger. If we
follow Sharmazanov's logic, so the dark and cold face of the Armenian
foreign minister Edward Nalbandyan expressed his happiness. Moreover,
if we follow this logic, we may presume that Edward Nalbandyan seeing
that Davutoglu was smiling from anger decided that he had to have an
angry face expression to express his happiness for people thinking
like Sharmazanov not to think that he was as angry as Davutoglu. It
is not ruled out either that Davutoglu saw the darkened face from
happiness of Nalbandyan and started smiling from anger. No doubt,
Chouchner, Clinton and a little Lavrov were angry too who were smiling
like Davutoglu. And the CoE commissioner Javier Solana apparently was
in stress and wanted to feel some happiness on Nalbandyan's cold and
dark face.
The question is that there are people looking at whose faces you are
able to understand something though wrongly, but there are others
looking at whose faces you cannot even understand anything wrongly
because their thoughts are quite understandable. In addition, within
the Armenian government, such people are the complete majority. This
is the reason why a normal and grounded explanation of their own steps
is from the sphere of fantasy for the Armenian government which is
the reason why so important situations are explained with such simple
words like if Azeris are dissatisfied so we have to be content. But if
Davutoglu is smiling from anger, Aliyev is not smiling from happiness
just like Edward Nalbandyan.