Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Once Obedient, Once Unyielding

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Once Obedient, Once Unyielding

    ONCE OBEDIENT, ONCE UNYIELDING
    James Hakobyan

    http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/comments-lra hos15587.html
    11:58:46 - 19/10/2009

    The phone conversation of the American and Turkish presidents
    which followed Serge Sargsyan's visit to Turkey creates grounds
    for interesting thoughts. The point is that in the same period the
    Azerbaijani foreign minister Elmal Mamedyarov stated that the Armenian
    side arouses questions in connection with the Karabakh issue which
    had already been settled two-three years ago. In other words, this
    means that Serge Sargsyan arouses questions settled during Robert
    Kocharyan's tenure. In other words, Serge Sargsyan comes out not to
    agree with previous arrangements. And since Mamedyarov states this
    with dissatisfaction, so Serge Sargsyan's opinions are apparent
    to have become stricter in this connection. The first hint in this
    relation took place before Serge Sargsyan's leaving for Turkey when
    he stated in the airport before leaving for Moscow that no question
    on yielding lands is discussed with Aliyev.

    Naturally, the question occurs what determines Serge Sargsyan's
    becoming sharply strict if earlier he had softer opinions in this
    connection than Robert Kocharyan who during the last years of
    this tenure threatened Azerbaijan to even recognize the Karabakh
    independence. What happened with Serge Sargsyan who signed the Moscow
    declaration that he started expressing strict signs in connection with
    the Karabakh issue? Is the point the Armenian and Turkish relations?

    In other words, the Minsk group co-chairs are possible to have
    given to Serge Sargsyan their agreement to strengthen his opinions
    in Karabakh issue. But in this case Serge Sargsyan comes out to
    be right when stating that Karabakh is not a precondition in the
    Armenian and Turkish relations. From this point, it is interesting
    that Barack Obama speaking to the Turkish president underscored the
    importance of continuing the normalization of the Armenian and Turkish
    relations. In other words, Obama is possible to see some problems in
    connection with ratifying the protocols in Turkey and hints that it
    should not be failed. And the failure may happen in Turkey only if
    what the Turks want in connection with Karabakh lacks. In other words,
    Obama seems to be persuading Gul not to pay attention to the Karabakh
    issue and to ratify the protocols.

    >>From this point, much will be revealed during the visit of the
    Turkish prime minister to the U.S. on October 29 sure, if by that
    time the Armenian and Turkish protocols do not appear in the Turkish
    parliament for ratification. Anyway, it becomes evident that the
    Karabakh issue is put at some distance from the Armenian and Turkish
    process.

    International mediators are not ruled out to be trying to bring the
    process to a crucial point to get engaged in taking the other beyond it
    later. In any case, the dynamism which is expressed in the Armenian
    and Turkish process seems to lack in the Karabakh issue. This of
    course does not mean that the Armenian diplomacy managed to register
    a big victory. Here no worth of the Armenian diplomacy exists. This
    diplomacy merely gets use of the agreement of the super powers in
    the Karabakh issue which is the reason why it is once obedient or
    unyielding. But it itself does not know what it is in reality.
Working...
X