Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Diplomacy Of The Turks; Both East And West

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New Diplomacy Of The Turks; Both East And West

    NEW DIPLOMACY OF THE TURKS; BOTH EAST AND WEST
    by Ahmad Kazemi

    Javan Newspaper (in Persian)
    Oct 29 2009
    Iran

    As a sign of protest to the continuation of the crimes of the Zionist
    regime against the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, the Turkish
    government has prevented the armed forces of that regime from taking
    part in annual air exercises with a number of other NATO countries.

    Those exercises were due to be held under the code name of "Anatolian
    Eagle", with the participation of Israeli, Italian, American and the
    members of NATO between 10-20 October of the current year (18 Mehr to
    2 Aban). However, following Turkey's opposition to the participation
    of the Zionist regime, followed by the refusal of a number of Western
    countries to take part in those exercises as a sign of protest to
    Turkey's decision, the exercises that had been planned to be held on
    those days were cancelled.

    Ever since the year 1996, when on the initiative of General Cevik Bir,
    the architect of military relations between Turkey and the Zionist
    regime, the military relations between the two countries were made
    public, this is the first time that Turkey has adopted such a position
    vis-a-vis Tel Aviv.

    Turkey's decision to eliminate the name of the Zionist regime from the
    list of the participants in the Anatolian Eagle exercise has given
    rise to different reactions. Philip Crowley, the spokesman of the
    American Ministry of Foreign Affairs [State Department], in a press
    conference said that taking Israel's name out of the list of the
    participants in the exercises had not been a correct move. Holland
    and Italy that were also due to take part in those exercises did
    not take part in them due to the Turkish decision. The officials of
    the Zionist regime also announced that they would review the sale of
    advanced weapons to Turkey.

    As the result of the tension that has come about due to Turkey's
    opposition to the participation of the Zionist regime in the exercises,
    on 21 Mehr [12 October 2009] the Zionist regime summoned its ambassador
    to Turkey. She also protested against some programmes on Turkey's
    state television, especially a serial called "Separation" broadcast
    on the TRT television network, which is about the Zionist regime's
    Cast Lead Operation and aggression against Gaza. Two months ago,
    in reaction to the Zionist regime's refusal to allow Turkish Foreign
    Minister Ahmet Davutoglu to visit Gaza from the occupied Palestine,
    he decided to cancel his visit [presumably to Israel].

    The fact is that since the collapse of the hated monarchical regime in
    Iran, Turkey has been known as the closest political and military ally
    of the Zionist regime in the Islamic world. In 1949 Turkey recognised
    the filthy existence of the Zionist regime, and from the year 1996
    when the bilateral military co-operation between the two sides became
    public, Turkey has been very sensitive towards those relations. The
    extremist secular military officers of Turkey have been the strongest
    supporters of relations with the Zionist regime. So far, Turkey
    has signed scores of agreements, including some agreements on the
    purchase of weapons and the renovation of Turkey's military aircraft
    and tanks by the Zionist regime. Some of those agreements have been
    very important in preventing the bankruptcy of some of the Zionist
    regime's military companies. As a result of those co-operations, the
    Zionist regime has been one of the fixed pillars of joint military
    exercises with Turkey.

    During the past decade, Turkey and the Zionist regime have repeatedly
    held joint military exercises. The Anatolian Eagle exercises were
    due to be the biggest and most important joint air exercises in the
    whole world. These exercises had been held regularly on an annual
    basis since 2001, and in all those exercises in addition to NATO
    countries the Zionist regime has also taken part. The last case of the
    participation of the Zionist regime in the Anatolian Eagle exercises
    was between 28 April and 16 May of last year in Kunia. The Zionist
    regime also takes part in Turkey's naval exercises. The last of such
    exercises was the Bride of the Sea exercises that were held at the
    beginning of last summer. In fact, after the 22-day war in Gaza and
    Rejeb Tayyip Erdogan's protest to Shimon Peres, the president of the
    Zionist regime, in Davos, the Bride of the Sea exercises were the
    last joint exercises between the two countries.

    Under these circumstances, Turkey's opposition to the participation of
    the Zionist regime in the Anatolian Eagle exercises, which resulted
    in the withdrawal of other Western countries and the cancellation of
    those exercises, has given rise to many questions in people's minds.

    The most important question is why at the present time Turkey has
    opposed the participation of the Zionist regime in the Anatolian Eagle
    exercises. An even more important question is whether a fundamental
    change has taken place in Turkey's relations with the Zionist regime.

    Why were Anatolian Eagle exercises delayed?

    Turkish officials have said that their opposition to the Zionist
    regime's participation in the Anatolian Eagle exercises has been a
    sign of their protest to the continuation of the Zionist regime's
    operations in the Gaza Strip, as well as a sign of protest to that
    regime's disrespect to the Masjid al-Aqsa and the Zionist regime's
    attacks on those taking part in prayers at the Holy Quds [Jerusalem].

    Although those issues have to some extent been influential in Turkey's
    decision to oppose the Zionist regime's participation in the Anatolian
    Eagle exercises, nevertheless, one has to ask why at the height of the
    Zionist regime's aggression against Gaza and the 22-day war, Turkey was
    not prepared to cancel the permission to the Zionist regime's fighters
    to fly in the skies of Kunia. This was despite the fact that the people
    of Kunia had repeatedly protested against that issue and, by gathering
    outside the Kunia fighter base, had asked those practices to end.

    At that time, apart from some minor protests, such as the cancellation
    of only one of the scores of agreements with the Zionist regime,
    Turkey did not take any more practical steps against the Zionist
    regime. Therefore, experts believe that there have been other
    considerations behind Turkey's opposition to the Zionist regime's
    participation in the Anatolian Eagle exercises. One can evaluate
    those reasons and motivations under three headings:

    First, this decision by the Turkish government can be due to the
    ever-intensifying wave of opposition among the public opinion in
    Turkey to the Zionist regime. People's hatred for the Zionist regime
    has increased, especially after the 33-day war against Lebanon and
    the 22-day war against Gaza. Reliable opinion polls show that more
    than 80 per cent of the Turkish people are opposed to the Zionist
    regime. In the past, any time that the Zionist regime had taken part
    in the Anatolian Eagle exercises there had been extensive opposition
    against the Turkish government in the Turkish media and popular
    circles. On those occasions, Turkish media referred to the fighter
    planes of the Zionist regime as murderous fighters.

    Meanwhile, turning the Kunia province to a scene for training and for
    air exercises of America and the Zionist regime and holding joint
    exercises had resulted in breaking the sound barrier in the skies
    of that province. In addition to doing a great deal of environmental
    damage to the region, the exercises had also greatly inconvenienced
    the people in Kunia province.

    Under these circumstances, no matter what has been the motive behind
    the decision of the Turkish government to oppose the Zionist regime's
    participation in the Anatolian Eagle exercises, it has been in keeping
    with the wishes of the Turkish people. Such decisions will improve
    the position of the Justice and Development Party in the forthcoming
    election. This is why in an interview with al-Arabiyya Television
    channel, the Turkish prime ministers insisted that the Turkish people
    were opposed to the presence of Israeli fighters in their country,
    and the government in Ankara had responded to public sensitivity to
    that issue.

    The second reason is that the issue of the Zionist regime's
    participation in the Anatolian Eagle exercises had been approved
    despite the fact that during the past few months that regime had
    repeatedly made military threats against Iran. Although those
    threats have been nothing but boastful nonsense [rajaz khani],
    and although the Zionist regime is far too weak to want to attack
    Iran, nevertheless, the principle of good neighbourliness required a
    neighbouring country to prevent the participation of a country in the
    Anatolian Eagle exercises which made repeated military threats against
    a neighbour. Turkey's recent decision can also be analysed in that
    context, especially as earlier on both Iran and Syria had expressed
    their unhappiness about the military moves of the Zionist regime.

    Turkey is willing to play a role in nuclear talks between Iran and the
    Western countries, and in order to do this she needs to win Iran's
    trust. In this connection, in an interview with NTV channel, Umur
    Celik, Rejeb Tayyip Erdogan's political advisor, stressed: "Turkey
    will not sacrifice her relations with her neighbours for the sake of
    relations with Israel." He added: "At a time when Israel is talking of
    confronting Iran, Turkey cannot allow Israel's fighter planes to take
    part in military exercises in Turkish territory." Umur Celik added:
    "Not long ago, Israel's fighter planes had attacked some installations
    in the Syrian territory."

    The third reason is the emergence of differences in the bilateral
    relations between Turkey and the Zionist regime. These differences
    have been intensified since the occupation of Iraq when it was
    revealed that the Zionist regime had been inciting the Iraqi Kurds
    to declare independence, as well as supporting the PKK. The Zionist
    regime's refusal to act according to its commitments, including
    the agreement to sell ten Hermes drones to Turkey, have further
    intensified those differences. According to some reports, that
    agreement has been cancelled, and this might have been the reason
    for the unprecedented Turkish military's agreement with the decision
    of the Turkish government to oppose the participation of the Zionist
    regime in the Anatolian Eagle exercises.

    The projects to update the military equipment of the Turkish armed
    forces with the help of the Zionist regime, in addition to many
    disgraceful financial practices and not observing the requirements
    of issuing tenders, have given rise to a great deal of opposition
    inside Turkey. The crash of a number of Turkish fighter planes that
    had been updated by the Zionist regime due to technical faults has
    added to those oppositions. Consequently, this could also be one
    reason for Turkey's opposition to the participation of the Zionist
    regime in the Anatolian Eagle exercises.

    In fact, some analysts believe that by predicting the continuation of
    cold relations with the Zionist regime, Turkey is trying to replace
    its relations with the Armenian lobby instead of its relations with
    the Zionist lobby. This could also be one of the reasons for the
    normalisation of Turkey's relations with Armenia.

    Will Ankara distance itself from Tel Aviv?

    It seems that Turkey is following some very important goals in
    demonstrating her anti-Zionist credentials. The first Turkish scenario
    in distancing itself from the Zionist regime was Erdogan's action
    in the Davos Conference in January 2009 when he called Shimon Peres,
    the president of the Zionist regime, a murderer.

    By condemning the Zionist regime's actions in Gaza and by a "show
    of protest" at the roundtable in Davos in Switzerland, Turkey has
    made the best propaganda use of that occasion. She has managed to
    win the views of the public throughout the Islamic world, especially
    due to the weakness of the Arab countries, without having experienced
    any practical losses. So far, no agreements with the Zionist regime
    have been cancelled, and apart from the symbolic cancellation of the
    parliamentary friendship group with the Zionist regime, no limitations
    have been imposed on that regime's activities in Turkey.

    After his show in Davos, in a speech in the General Assembly of
    the United Nations, Erdogan complained about the international
    community's inaction towards the crimes of the Zionist regime in Gaza
    and the disregard of Goldstone's report. Now, Erdogan has also taken
    the initiative by opposing the participation of the Zionist regime
    in the Anatolian Eagle exercises. It is interesting that with the
    cancellation of the Anatolian Eagle exercises, Turkish officials have
    spoken about the first joint exercises between Turkey and Syria. Last
    spring the first joint exercises between Turkish-Syrian ground forces
    were held on the borders of the two countries. Those exercises
    aroused the reaction of the Zionist regime, and the Turkish armed
    forces responded that it had nothing to do with the regime in Tel Aviv.

    It seems that Turkey intends to gain the reputation of acting as the
    flag-bearer of opposition and confrontation of the Zionist regime,
    which at the moment is a position held by Iran. However, the main
    question is what goals is Turkey pursuing by wishing to become the
    flag-bearer of opposition to the Zionist regime. Is it possible that
    after playing that role, Turkey intends to move the public opinion
    in the Islamic world and in Syria towards compromise with the Zionist
    regime?

    It is in view of these considerations that one cannot emphatically
    state that Turkey is looking for a fundamental change in its relations
    with the Zionist regime and joining a front against that regime.

    During the past two or three years, due to being disappointed by
    the European Union and by the West, as well as the consequences of
    regional developments, such as the occupation of Iraq and the need
    for regional solidarity, Turkey has moved closer to the Middle East,
    Russia, the Caucuses and Central Asia. Nevertheless, it is too early
    to say that those moves mean that there has been a strategic change
    in Turkey's relations with the West and with the Zionist regime.
Working...
X