Tweet
WHAT WILL BE PROVED?
http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/society-lraho s15142.html
12:20:51 - 11/09/2009
When an Armenian seriously thinks that Turks are idiots, creates
serious grounds to doubt about his seriousness or wisdom. And such
kind of Armenians exists who proceeding from the cult of football
diplomacy do not say directly that Turks are idiots but it is
difficult to think anything else when an Armenian says that we do not
have to be afraid of studying historical facts because they are in our
interest and discussing them with Turks will prove the fact of
genocide.
So these people really think that Turks are so idiots that do not
realize that the facts are in the favor of Armenians and decide to
discuss them without thinking that afterwards they will be forced to
recognize the genocide. Even if the Turks have never thought about it
before, so now when they hear the wise observations of the Armenian
apologists that we Armenians do not need to be afraid of historical
facts, will surely renounce the historical discussion proposed by
them.
But we see that they do not renounce even after hearing all this which
means that they are either completely idiots or we are idiots not to
understand that Turks cannot be idiots and if they propose historical
discussions this means that they have already calculated and clarified
something. And in result of this calculation it maybe found out that
there was not a genocide but just a fight during which Armenians
killed Turks.
And we do not have to be sure about the might of the Armenian
historians. They are of course powerful but not in convincing the
Turks but in washing the brains of the Armenian society. They are able
to convince the Armenian society that a certain person is a hero and
the other one is a betrayer. But the historical discussions with the
Turks will not be held on heroism or betrayals. The discussion will be
based on historical documents which, by the way, the society does not
have, consequently, when an Armenian historian tries to convince an
Armenian citizen that a certain person is a hero, the citizen does not
demand a certification of heroism. And in the discussion with the
Turks no one knows what documents and certifications they are going to
present to the Armenian side: document, the existence of which has
never occurred to the Armenian side because Armenians are led by the
opinion that Turks are idiots. And in this case, Armenians during
discussions with Turks will not prove the fact of genocide but their
own silliness.
HAKOB BADALYAN
http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/society-lraho s15142.html
12:20:51 - 11/09/2009
When an Armenian seriously thinks that Turks are idiots, creates
serious grounds to doubt about his seriousness or wisdom. And such
kind of Armenians exists who proceeding from the cult of football
diplomacy do not say directly that Turks are idiots but it is
difficult to think anything else when an Armenian says that we do not
have to be afraid of studying historical facts because they are in our
interest and discussing them with Turks will prove the fact of
genocide.
So these people really think that Turks are so idiots that do not
realize that the facts are in the favor of Armenians and decide to
discuss them without thinking that afterwards they will be forced to
recognize the genocide. Even if the Turks have never thought about it
before, so now when they hear the wise observations of the Armenian
apologists that we Armenians do not need to be afraid of historical
facts, will surely renounce the historical discussion proposed by
them.
But we see that they do not renounce even after hearing all this which
means that they are either completely idiots or we are idiots not to
understand that Turks cannot be idiots and if they propose historical
discussions this means that they have already calculated and clarified
something. And in result of this calculation it maybe found out that
there was not a genocide but just a fight during which Armenians
killed Turks.
And we do not have to be sure about the might of the Armenian
historians. They are of course powerful but not in convincing the
Turks but in washing the brains of the Armenian society. They are able
to convince the Armenian society that a certain person is a hero and
the other one is a betrayer. But the historical discussions with the
Turks will not be held on heroism or betrayals. The discussion will be
based on historical documents which, by the way, the society does not
have, consequently, when an Armenian historian tries to convince an
Armenian citizen that a certain person is a hero, the citizen does not
demand a certification of heroism. And in the discussion with the
Turks no one knows what documents and certifications they are going to
present to the Armenian side: document, the existence of which has
never occurred to the Armenian side because Armenians are led by the
opinion that Turks are idiots. And in this case, Armenians during
discussions with Turks will not prove the fact of genocide but their
own silliness.
HAKOB BADALYAN