Tweet
The great rivalries of chess
By Finlo Rohrer
BBC News Magazine
2009/09/22 11:56:54 GMT
Chess is a game that rarely draws a massive amount of attention from the
global public, but a rematch between Kasparov and Karpov reminds us that it
throws up the occasional great rivalry.
When Garry Kasparov challenged Anatoly Karpov in 1984 for the chess world
championship, it was the beginning of a titanic struggle.
The contest lasted five months and featured a series of successive draws of
17 and 15 games. It was controversially ended by the chess authorities over
fears for the health of the players, both of whom had lost weight during the
struggle. Kasparov had been resurgent at the end, although Karpov still held
a lead.
In 1985, Kasparov beat Karpov for the title. They played for it again in
1986 and again Kasparov won. In 1987, Kasparov was one down going into the
final game, but recovered to tie the series and therefore retain his crown.
It was a great chess rivalry, but it was more than that to the watching
public and pundits.
"It was very symbolic of what was happening to the Soviet Union," says
grandmaster Raymond Keene, chess correspondent for the Times. "It was
obvious the USSR was going through a period of great turmoil."
And the rivalry was perfect in pitching a brilliant, brooding outsider
against the Soviet establishment's main man.
"Kasparov was a southerner, half-Jewish, half-Armenian, much younger, in the
vanguard of a change, taking on the golden boy of the old Soviet Union,"
says Keene.
Keene organised the London matches of the third series between the players
in 1985, which took place both in the UK and Leningrad. He was surprised by
the stark disparity between the Soviet and the Western ways of organising
things.
In London, after the matches, a list of moves with annotation was faxed all
over the world within 15 minutes of the conclusion. In Leningrad, a sheet
bearing only the moves was typed up, a press officer with a minder was taken
to the local party HQ where the only photocopier was to be found, the sheet
was copied and then manually handed only to the journalists present at the
event.
"They were still mired in Soviet bureaucracy and fear of publicity. I
thought 'this place is doomed'.
"It was a gigantic metaphor for the collapse of a creaking, unviable,
introspective, conglomerate empire."
There had been other rivalries that never succeeded in sparking the
imagination. Mikhail Tal against Mikhail Botvinnik in the early 1960s had
the same hallmarks of the non-Russian outsider against the Soviet stalwart,
but failed to develop into a sustained struggle. And the earlier battle
between Vasily Smyslov and Botvinnik is probably one for chess aficionados
only.
The other rivalry that spread outside the world of chess was between Bobby
Fischer and Boris Spassky. Their famous 1972 world championship match became
another symbol of the struggle between civilisations.
Fischer was the Western maverick up against Spassky, the emblem of the
powerful Soviet machine. And Fischer won.
"It was about Western individualism, depth of analysis, use of the
technology available," says Keene.
And the notion that ideas of a greater struggle would be imposed on chess
was an invention of the Stalinist era.
The Communist official Nikolai Krylenko took his board games seriously. He
was reported to have said: "We must organise shock brigades of chess
players, and begin immediate realisation of a five-year plan for chess."
He might have approved of the great rivalries with an ideological flavour
that grew up in the 1970s and 80s. He would have been less delighted that on
both occasions the Soviet establishment's representative was bested.
Other sports have individual rivalries. Tennis has had some great ones.
But perhaps only boxing, with its system of champion and challengers, comes
close to replicating the way that the protagonists have to study each
other's play and personality, even live in each other's skin, during the
mind-bogglingly detailed preparations for a world championship series.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/uk_new s/magazine/8268746.stm
Published: 2009/09/22 11:56:54 GMT
© BBC MMIX
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
By Finlo Rohrer
BBC News Magazine
2009/09/22 11:56:54 GMT
Chess is a game that rarely draws a massive amount of attention from the
global public, but a rematch between Kasparov and Karpov reminds us that it
throws up the occasional great rivalry.
When Garry Kasparov challenged Anatoly Karpov in 1984 for the chess world
championship, it was the beginning of a titanic struggle.
The contest lasted five months and featured a series of successive draws of
17 and 15 games. It was controversially ended by the chess authorities over
fears for the health of the players, both of whom had lost weight during the
struggle. Kasparov had been resurgent at the end, although Karpov still held
a lead.
In 1985, Kasparov beat Karpov for the title. They played for it again in
1986 and again Kasparov won. In 1987, Kasparov was one down going into the
final game, but recovered to tie the series and therefore retain his crown.
It was a great chess rivalry, but it was more than that to the watching
public and pundits.
"It was very symbolic of what was happening to the Soviet Union," says
grandmaster Raymond Keene, chess correspondent for the Times. "It was
obvious the USSR was going through a period of great turmoil."
And the rivalry was perfect in pitching a brilliant, brooding outsider
against the Soviet establishment's main man.
"Kasparov was a southerner, half-Jewish, half-Armenian, much younger, in the
vanguard of a change, taking on the golden boy of the old Soviet Union,"
says Keene.
Keene organised the London matches of the third series between the players
in 1985, which took place both in the UK and Leningrad. He was surprised by
the stark disparity between the Soviet and the Western ways of organising
things.
In London, after the matches, a list of moves with annotation was faxed all
over the world within 15 minutes of the conclusion. In Leningrad, a sheet
bearing only the moves was typed up, a press officer with a minder was taken
to the local party HQ where the only photocopier was to be found, the sheet
was copied and then manually handed only to the journalists present at the
event.
"They were still mired in Soviet bureaucracy and fear of publicity. I
thought 'this place is doomed'.
"It was a gigantic metaphor for the collapse of a creaking, unviable,
introspective, conglomerate empire."
There had been other rivalries that never succeeded in sparking the
imagination. Mikhail Tal against Mikhail Botvinnik in the early 1960s had
the same hallmarks of the non-Russian outsider against the Soviet stalwart,
but failed to develop into a sustained struggle. And the earlier battle
between Vasily Smyslov and Botvinnik is probably one for chess aficionados
only.
The other rivalry that spread outside the world of chess was between Bobby
Fischer and Boris Spassky. Their famous 1972 world championship match became
another symbol of the struggle between civilisations.
Fischer was the Western maverick up against Spassky, the emblem of the
powerful Soviet machine. And Fischer won.
"It was about Western individualism, depth of analysis, use of the
technology available," says Keene.
And the notion that ideas of a greater struggle would be imposed on chess
was an invention of the Stalinist era.
The Communist official Nikolai Krylenko took his board games seriously. He
was reported to have said: "We must organise shock brigades of chess
players, and begin immediate realisation of a five-year plan for chess."
He might have approved of the great rivalries with an ideological flavour
that grew up in the 1970s and 80s. He would have been less delighted that on
both occasions the Soviet establishment's representative was bested.
Other sports have individual rivalries. Tennis has had some great ones.
But perhaps only boxing, with its system of champion and challengers, comes
close to replicating the way that the protagonists have to study each
other's play and personality, even live in each other's skin, during the
mind-bogglingly detailed preparations for a world championship series.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/uk_new s/magazine/8268746.stm
Published: 2009/09/22 11:56:54 GMT
© BBC MMIX
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress