Tweet
EURASIA INSIGHT
http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insi ghtb/articles/eav092509.shtml
TURKEY: IS ANKARA SET TO BECOME A VITAL PLAYER IN REVAMPED US
ANTI-MISSILE SHIELD?
Yigal Schleifer 9/25/09
Speculation is building in Turkey over whether Ankara will play a part
in a revamped US missile-defense network, one designed mainly to
contain Iran. Conjecture is being fueled by two recent developments:
the Obama administration's decision to scrap the construction of an
anti-missile shield in Central Europe, and Turkey's own announcement
that it intends to purchase its first missile-defense system.
Although it's not clear if Ankara's plan to buy a missile defense
system is being coordinated with the United States, experts say the
purchase is an indication that -- despite its warming relations
between Turkey and Iran, and Turkish officials' promotion of a
diplomatic solution to the question of Iran's nuclear program --
Turkey is not taking any chances regarding its neighbor's
intentions. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive].
"There is an unstated rivalry [between Turkey and Iran]. They are two
powerful states in the region and each one has its own strategy and
Turkey now has one of playing an active role in the region," says Sami
Kohen, a columnist with the daily Milliyet and a veteran observer of
Turkish foreign policy.
"Turkey thinks that there are a lot of common interests with
Iran. There are improving trade, economic, and energy ties. There has
been a period of normalization, which has now been followed by a
period of closer ties," Kohen continued. "Nevertheless, people in
responsible positions who want to see Turkey grow as a key regional
player believe there is a rivalry with Iran."
If it wants to play the part of regional power-broker, added Kohen,
"Turkey can't lag [militarily] behind other countries in the
neighborhood - Iran on the one hand and Greece on the other."
Relations between Turkey and Iran have improved dramatically in recent
years, particularly since the governing moderate Islamist Justice and
Development Party (AKP) gained power in 2002. Party leaders have tried
to uphold a pledge to pursue a regional foreign policy of "zero
problems" with its neighbors.
Turkish-Iranian trade hit $10 billion in 2008, compared to $1 billion
in 2000. Iran also supplies close to a third of Turkey's gas
supply. Turkish officials, meanwhile, were among the first and only to
congratulate Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmedinejad after his
controversial reelection in June. [For background see the Eurasia
Insight archive].
Turkey and Iran share a 310-mile (499 kilometer) border, and both
Turkish and Iranian diplomats like to point out that the two Muslim
neighbors have been at peace for centuries. Speaking on Turkish
television on September 18, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu
rejected the idea that Turkey's plan to spend close to $1 billion on a
missile defense system -- either American-made Patriots, or systems
from Russia or China -- is aimed at Iran.
"It is wrong to draw links between the Patriot and Iran," he told CNN
Turk. "We neither have a perception of threat from any of the
neighboring countries, nor have any military or security related
preparation against them."
But Turkish analysts say that the peace that Ankara and Tehran have
maintained for so long is based on a delicate balance of military
power between the two countries, one that would be fundamentally
disturbed if Iran were to acquire nuclear weapons.
"The bottom line is that Turkey can't accept an Iran with nuclear
weapons. A nuclear weapons-capable Iran or a nuclear-armed Iran is not
in the interest of Turkey," says Mustafa Kibaroglu, an expert on
nuclear non-proliferation issues at Bilkent University in Ankara.
"The continuation of Iran's nuclear program for peaceful ends is a
natural right, but it is impossible to support it, if it concerns [the
development] of weapons of mass destruction," Turkish Prime Minister
Recep Tayyip Erdogan said back in 2006.
Although Turkish officials to date have kept their distance from
American plans to introduce a more fluid European-based missile
defense plan, experts say Ankara could benefit by being involved. [For
background see the Eurasia Insight archive].
Even though the Obama administration has abandoned plans to place an
anti-missile system in Poland and the Czech Republic, US officials
have made it clear that they intend to deploy such a system elsewhere,
in a location better able to cope with the rapidly escalating Iranian
threat. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive].
"The whole plan is going on, but in a different version, and it gets
more interesting now with countries like Turkey ? possibly [getting]
involved. It seems like the scope of the system is being increased,"
said Lt Col Marcel de Haas, a senior researcher at the Netherlands
Institute of International Relations.
"The question is if [placing Patriot missiles in Turkey is] going to
be part of a theater missile defense?" he adds.
"If that is the case for Turkey -- in this whole expanded scheme of
missile defense -- it is quite interesting. I say it strengthens the
Turkish position in NATO, and you can also consider it part of
European defense, which could possibly bring Turkey closer to the
European Union."
Other observers have suggested that placing Patriots in Turkey could
also bolster Turkish-US relations, which have gone through several
strained periods in recent years. [For background see the Eurasia
Insight archive].
"Poland's loss may be Turkey's and America's gain: Turkey is the only
NATO country that borders Iran, and US-Turkish cooperation on Tehran
is key to Washington's success in tackling Iran's nuclearization,"
Washington-based analyst Soner Cagaptay recently wrote in an online
forum hosted by the New York Times.
Milliyet's Kohen believes that, for now, Turkey is pursuing its own
course regarding missile defense. "There is no linkage between this
[the anti-missile system purchase] and the US shield project. This
hasn't been discussed yet," he said.
Still, the announcement of the plan to possibly buy the Patriot system
is stoking an intensifying debate in Turkey, with some pundits coming
out as steadfastly against such a course of action.
"Are we taking defense against Iran's missiles? Against which other
countries do we need to build such a system?" columnist Mehmet Ali
Birand recently wrote in the English-language Hurriyet Daily
News. "What happened to our successful zero-problem politics with our
neighbors? I thought we were supporting Iran and resisting a brisk
reaction from the United States against Iran's nuclear arms
program. As you see, our minds are mighty confused."
Speaking to Today's Zaman, another English-language daily, Ihsan Dagi,
a professor of international relations at Ankara's Middle East
Technical University said purchasing a missile defense system would be
"inflammatory" and would set back Turkey's efforts to establish itself
as a regional peacemaker.
"If it ever happens, Turkey's efforts to help Iran integrate into the
region will be undermined," Dagi said.
Editor's Note: Yigal Schleifer is a freelance journalist based in
Istanbul.
http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insi ghtb/articles/eav092509.shtml
TURKEY: IS ANKARA SET TO BECOME A VITAL PLAYER IN REVAMPED US
ANTI-MISSILE SHIELD?
Yigal Schleifer 9/25/09
Speculation is building in Turkey over whether Ankara will play a part
in a revamped US missile-defense network, one designed mainly to
contain Iran. Conjecture is being fueled by two recent developments:
the Obama administration's decision to scrap the construction of an
anti-missile shield in Central Europe, and Turkey's own announcement
that it intends to purchase its first missile-defense system.
Although it's not clear if Ankara's plan to buy a missile defense
system is being coordinated with the United States, experts say the
purchase is an indication that -- despite its warming relations
between Turkey and Iran, and Turkish officials' promotion of a
diplomatic solution to the question of Iran's nuclear program --
Turkey is not taking any chances regarding its neighbor's
intentions. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive].
"There is an unstated rivalry [between Turkey and Iran]. They are two
powerful states in the region and each one has its own strategy and
Turkey now has one of playing an active role in the region," says Sami
Kohen, a columnist with the daily Milliyet and a veteran observer of
Turkish foreign policy.
"Turkey thinks that there are a lot of common interests with
Iran. There are improving trade, economic, and energy ties. There has
been a period of normalization, which has now been followed by a
period of closer ties," Kohen continued. "Nevertheless, people in
responsible positions who want to see Turkey grow as a key regional
player believe there is a rivalry with Iran."
If it wants to play the part of regional power-broker, added Kohen,
"Turkey can't lag [militarily] behind other countries in the
neighborhood - Iran on the one hand and Greece on the other."
Relations between Turkey and Iran have improved dramatically in recent
years, particularly since the governing moderate Islamist Justice and
Development Party (AKP) gained power in 2002. Party leaders have tried
to uphold a pledge to pursue a regional foreign policy of "zero
problems" with its neighbors.
Turkish-Iranian trade hit $10 billion in 2008, compared to $1 billion
in 2000. Iran also supplies close to a third of Turkey's gas
supply. Turkish officials, meanwhile, were among the first and only to
congratulate Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmedinejad after his
controversial reelection in June. [For background see the Eurasia
Insight archive].
Turkey and Iran share a 310-mile (499 kilometer) border, and both
Turkish and Iranian diplomats like to point out that the two Muslim
neighbors have been at peace for centuries. Speaking on Turkish
television on September 18, Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu
rejected the idea that Turkey's plan to spend close to $1 billion on a
missile defense system -- either American-made Patriots, or systems
from Russia or China -- is aimed at Iran.
"It is wrong to draw links between the Patriot and Iran," he told CNN
Turk. "We neither have a perception of threat from any of the
neighboring countries, nor have any military or security related
preparation against them."
But Turkish analysts say that the peace that Ankara and Tehran have
maintained for so long is based on a delicate balance of military
power between the two countries, one that would be fundamentally
disturbed if Iran were to acquire nuclear weapons.
"The bottom line is that Turkey can't accept an Iran with nuclear
weapons. A nuclear weapons-capable Iran or a nuclear-armed Iran is not
in the interest of Turkey," says Mustafa Kibaroglu, an expert on
nuclear non-proliferation issues at Bilkent University in Ankara.
"The continuation of Iran's nuclear program for peaceful ends is a
natural right, but it is impossible to support it, if it concerns [the
development] of weapons of mass destruction," Turkish Prime Minister
Recep Tayyip Erdogan said back in 2006.
Although Turkish officials to date have kept their distance from
American plans to introduce a more fluid European-based missile
defense plan, experts say Ankara could benefit by being involved. [For
background see the Eurasia Insight archive].
Even though the Obama administration has abandoned plans to place an
anti-missile system in Poland and the Czech Republic, US officials
have made it clear that they intend to deploy such a system elsewhere,
in a location better able to cope with the rapidly escalating Iranian
threat. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive].
"The whole plan is going on, but in a different version, and it gets
more interesting now with countries like Turkey ? possibly [getting]
involved. It seems like the scope of the system is being increased,"
said Lt Col Marcel de Haas, a senior researcher at the Netherlands
Institute of International Relations.
"The question is if [placing Patriot missiles in Turkey is] going to
be part of a theater missile defense?" he adds.
"If that is the case for Turkey -- in this whole expanded scheme of
missile defense -- it is quite interesting. I say it strengthens the
Turkish position in NATO, and you can also consider it part of
European defense, which could possibly bring Turkey closer to the
European Union."
Other observers have suggested that placing Patriots in Turkey could
also bolster Turkish-US relations, which have gone through several
strained periods in recent years. [For background see the Eurasia
Insight archive].
"Poland's loss may be Turkey's and America's gain: Turkey is the only
NATO country that borders Iran, and US-Turkish cooperation on Tehran
is key to Washington's success in tackling Iran's nuclearization,"
Washington-based analyst Soner Cagaptay recently wrote in an online
forum hosted by the New York Times.
Milliyet's Kohen believes that, for now, Turkey is pursuing its own
course regarding missile defense. "There is no linkage between this
[the anti-missile system purchase] and the US shield project. This
hasn't been discussed yet," he said.
Still, the announcement of the plan to possibly buy the Patriot system
is stoking an intensifying debate in Turkey, with some pundits coming
out as steadfastly against such a course of action.
"Are we taking defense against Iran's missiles? Against which other
countries do we need to build such a system?" columnist Mehmet Ali
Birand recently wrote in the English-language Hurriyet Daily
News. "What happened to our successful zero-problem politics with our
neighbors? I thought we were supporting Iran and resisting a brisk
reaction from the United States against Iran's nuclear arms
program. As you see, our minds are mighty confused."
Speaking to Today's Zaman, another English-language daily, Ihsan Dagi,
a professor of international relations at Ankara's Middle East
Technical University said purchasing a missile defense system would be
"inflammatory" and would set back Turkey's efforts to establish itself
as a regional peacemaker.
"If it ever happens, Turkey's efforts to help Iran integrate into the
region will be undermined," Dagi said.
Editor's Note: Yigal Schleifer is a freelance journalist based in
Istanbul.