Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

In Syria, a Prologue for Cities

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • In Syria, a Prologue for Cities

    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/06/science/06archeo .html?pagewanted=all


    By JOHN NOBLE WILFORD
    Published: April 5, 2010


    Archaeologists have embarked on excavations in northern Syria expected
    to widen and deepen understanding of a prehistoric culture in
    Mesopotamia that set the stage for the rise of the world's first
    cities and states and the invention of writing.

    In two seasons of preliminary surveying and digging at the site known
    as Tell Zeidan, American and Syrian investigators have already
    uncovered a tantalizing sampling of artifacts from what had been a
    robust pre-urban settlement on the upper Euphrates River. People
    occupied the site for two millenniums, until 4000 B.C. - a
    little-known but fateful period of human cultural evolution.

    Scholars of antiquity say that Zeidan should reveal insights into life
    in a time called the Ubaid period, 5500 to 4000 B.C. In those poorly
    studied centuries, irrigation agriculture became widespread,
    long-distance trade grew in influence socially and economically,
    powerful political leaders came to the fore and communities gradually
    divided into social classes of wealthy elites and poorer commoners.

    Gil Stein, director of the Oriental Institute of the University of
    Chicago, a leader of the excavations at Zeidan, said the site's
    northern location promised to enrich knowledge of the Ubaid culture's
    influence far from where the first urban centers eventually flourished
    in the lower Tigris and Euphrates Valley. The new explorations, he
    said, are planned to be the most comprehensive yet at a large Ubaid
    settlement, possibly yielding discoveries for decades.

    `I figure I'm going to be working there till I retire,' said Dr.
    Stein, who is 54.

    There are several reasons for excitement over the Zeidan excavations.
    Warfare and ensuing unstable conditions have locked archaeologists out
    of Iraq and its prime sites of Mesopotamian antiquity. So they have
    redoubled research in the upper river valleys, across the border in
    Syria and southern Turkey. And Zeidan is readily accessible. Having
    never been built upon by subsequent cultures, it is free of any
    overburden of ruins to thwart excavators.

    Above all, a driving ambition of archaeologists always is to dig
    beneath the known past for more than glimpses of the little known.

    For almost two centuries, the glory went to expeditions unearthing the
    houses and temples, granaries and workshops of earliest urban centers
    like Uruk, seat of the legendary Gilgamesh, and the later splendors of
    Ur and Nineveh. The challenge was to decipher the clay tablets of a
    literate civilization with beginnings in what is known as the Uruk
    period, 4000 to 3200 B.C.

    Uruk remains overshadowed the traces of Ubaid cultures, the region's
    earliest known complex society. Only a handful of ruins - at Ubaid,
    Eridu and Oueili in southern Mesopotamia and Tepe Gawra, in the north
    near Mosul, Iraq - had produced at best a sketchy picture of these
    older cultures. A few Ubaid sites in northern Syria were either too
    small to be revealing or virtually inaccessible under other ruins.

    A decade ago, Richard L. Zettler, a University of Pennsylvania
    archaeologist with extensive experience in Syria, said, `Our real
    focus now should not be on the Uruk period, but the Ubaid.'

    Last week, Dr. Zettler, who is not associated with the Chicago team
    but has visited the site, said that Zeidan preserves artifacts over a
    long sequence of Ubaid culture at a junction of major trade routes.
    `We should see the transition as the Ubaid spread from the south up to
    farming regions in the north,' he said.

    Guillermo Algaze, an anthropologist at the University of California,
    San Diego, and an authority on early urbanism in the Middle East not
    involved in new research, said recently that Zeidan `has the potential
    to revolutionize current interpretations of how civilization in the
    Near East came about.'

    Tell Zeidan is a two-hour drive southeast of Aleppo and three miles
    from the modern town of Raqqa. Muhammad Sarhan, a curator of the Raqqa
    Museum, is co-director, with Dr. Stein, of the excavations, formally
    known as the Joint Syrian-American Archaeological Research Project at
    Tell Zeidan.

    The site consists of three large mounds on the east bank of the Balikh
    River, just north of its confluence with the Euphrates. The mounds,
    the tallest being 50 feet high, enclose ruins of a lower town. Buried
    remains and a scattering of ceramics on the surface extend over an
    area of 31 acres, which makes this probably larger than any other
    known Ubaid community.

    It would seem that the mounds had long stood on the semi-arid
    landscape as an open invitation for archaeologists to stop and dig. A
    few stopped. The American archaeologist William F. Albright identified
    the place in 1926. The British archaeologist Sir Max Mallowan, husband
    of the mystery writer Agatha Christie, was intrigued and made a brief
    survey in the 1930s. A Dutch team led by Maurits van Loon took an
    interest in 1983, finding that the site appeared to date to the Ubaid
    period. A German group asked the Syrians for permission to excavate
    but was turned down.

    Finally, after initial visits to Zeidan, Dr. Stein said the Syrian
    government `encouraged me to submit an application' to dig. Why the
    change?

    `I was incredibly thrilled, but can only speculate on what their
    reasons were,' Dr. Stein said in a recent interview, referring to the
    Syrian decision. `Perhaps they were waiting for the right team to come
    along. Our institute had worked in Syria for something like 80 years,
    and we were interested in a long-term commitment. We also pointed out
    that the site was endangered from agricultural development along its
    edges. Parts of the site had already been bulldozed for fields and a
    canal.'

    In the summers of 2008 and 2009, Dr. Stein directed mapping of the
    Zeidan ruins and digging exploratory trenches. He said the initial
    findings confirmed this to be a `proto-urban community' in the Ubaid
    period, most likely the site of a prominent temple.

    A description and interpretation of the discoveries so far was
    published in the Oriental Institute's recent annual report, followed
    by an announcement this week by the University of Chicago. The
    international excavation team, supported by the National Science
    Foundation in the United States, is to resume fieldwork in July.

    Four distinct phases of occupation have been identified at Zeidan. A
    simpler culture known as the Halaf is found in the bottom sediments,
    well-preserved Ubaid material in the middle and two layers of late
    Copper Age remains on top. From the evidence so far, the transitions
    between periods seemed to have been peaceful.

    Archaeologists have turned up remains of house floors with hearths,
    fragments of mudbrick house walls, painted Ubaid pottery and sections
    of larger walls, possibly part of fortifications or monumental public
    architecture. The ceramic styles and radiocarbon tests date the wall
    to about 5000 B.C.

    One of the most telling finds was a stone seal depicting a deer,
    presumably used to stamp a mark on goods to identify ownership in a
    time before writing. About 2-by 2- 1/2 inches, the seal is unusually
    large and carved from a red stone not native to the area. In fact,
    archaeologists said, it was similar in design to a seal found 185
    miles to the east, at Tepe Gawra, near Mosul.

    To archaeologists, a seal is not just a seal. Dr. Zettler said it
    signifies that `somebody has the authority to restrict access to
    things - to close and seal jars, bags, doors - and so once you have
    these seals you must have had social stratification.'

    The existence of elaborate seals with near-identical motifs at such
    widely distant sites, Dr. Stein said, `suggests that in this period,
    high-ranking elites were assuming leadership positions across a very
    broad region, and those dispersed elites shared a common set of
    symbols and perhaps even a common ideology of superior social status.'

    Other artifacts attest to the culture's shift from self-sufficient
    village life to specialized craft production dependent on trade and
    capable of acquiring luxury goods, the archaeologists reported. Such a
    transition is assumed to have required some administrative structure
    and produced a wealthy class. The expedition will be searching for
    remains of temples and imposing public buildings as confirmation of
    these political and social changes.

    In what appears to be the site's industrial area, archaeologists
    uncovered eight large kilns for firing pottery, one of the most
    ubiquitous Ubaid commodities over wide trading areas. They found
    blades made from the high-quality volcanic glass obsidian. An
    abundance of obsidian chips showed that the blades were produced at
    the site, and the material's color and chemical composition indicated
    that it came from mines in what is now Turkey.

    `We found flint sickle blades everywhere,' Dr. Stein said, noting that
    they had a glossy sheen `where they had been polished by the silica in
    the stems of wheat that they were used to harvest.'

    Zeidan also had a smelting industry for making copper tools, the most
    advanced technology of the fifth millennium B.C. The people presumably
    reached as far as 250 miles away to trade for the nearest copper ore,
    at sources around modern-day Diyarbakir, Turkey. Getting the ore home
    was no easy task. In a time before the wheel or domesticated donkeys,
    people had to bear the heavy burden on their backs.

    A site like Tell Zeidan, Dr. Zettler said, is `telling us that the
    Uruk cities didn't come out of nowhere, they evolved from foundations
    laid in the Ubaid period.'

    Until recently, Dr. Algaze said, `accidents of data recovery' had led
    scholars to think the origin of cities and states in Mesopotamia was
    `a fairly abrupt occurrence in the fourth millennium that as
    concentrated in what is southern Iraq.'

    The southern cities may have been larger and more enduring, he said,
    but increasing exploration on the Mesopotamian periphery, especially
    the spread of trade and technology among interacting Ubaid cultures,
    suggests that `the seed of urban civilization' had been planted well
    before 4000 B.C.
Working...
X