Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

OSCE Yerevan : Political Prisoners first of all refer to March 1

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • OSCE Yerevan : Political Prisoners first of all refer to March 1

    Head of the OSCE Yerevan Office : When in Armenia they say about the
    political prisoners, they first of all mean those sentences as a
    result of March 1, 2008, events


    2010-04-09 18:01:00


    ArmInfo presents apologies to the head of the OSCE Yerevan Office Mr.
    Sergey Kapinos and the readers for serious technical mistakes made by
    ArmInfo news agency over translation of the issue about the public
    lecture delivered by Mr. Kapinos at the Russian-Armenian (Slavonic)
    University, on 6 April , 2010, which have led to distortion of the
    core of the lecture especially in the part regarding the prisoners in
    connection with the 1 March 2008 events in Yerevan.

    ArmInfo. The term "political prisoners" is used nowhere in the
    international-legal documents. One cannot find it in PACE resolutions
    on Armenia either. They just say about the prisoners in connection
    with the 1 March events. However, when here, in Armenia they speak
    about the political prisoners, they first of all mean those sentenced
    as a result of 1 March, 2008, events, Head of the OSCE Yerevan Office,
    Ambassador Sergey Kapinos said in the public lecture delivered by him
    at Russian-Armenian (Slavonic) University.

    According to him, the report by OSCE Bureau for Democratic
    Institutions and Human Rights on monitoring of judicial proceedings
    Has revealed serious tight spots and faults in the work of the
    judicial system. This report raises serious problems and causes doubts
    about impartiality of a number of court decisions. 'I am sure the
    issue will remain open until these problems and doubts are not
    removed', - the diplomat said.

    When speaking about the initiative of the Heritage party on
    organization of the roundtable with participation of the coalition and
    opposition parties for the joint discussion of the problems which are
    still relevant today and all the political forces are concerned about
    them, Kapinos emphasized that this idea is very useful but should not
    be limited by one political topic. There must be a dialogue. S.
    Kapinos recalled that in 2008 the OSCE chairman-in-office Ilkka
    Kanerva came forward with call to the political dialogue between the
    Armenian authorities and the opposition. According to him, a dialogue
    is the most civilized way of political struggle, therefore, OSCE
    unambiguously stands for the political dialogue among different
    political parties. He said this can really give positive results.
    According to the diplomat, a dialogue will promote stabilization and
    consolidation of the society.

    Asked if it would be better for the country if the political process
    was concentrated in the parliament, the diplomat replied that the role
    of the Armenian parliament in the political life of the country could
    be more essential. The parliament must discuss the most serious issues
    the people are concerned about. The amendments to the Constitution of
    Armenia, adopted in 2005, were also aimed at development of the
    parliamentary democracy. There is a field for movement in this
    direction. 'I am for resolving of all the principal issues in the
    parliament. The interests of different social layers as well as the
    real social and economical structure of the society should be
    reflected in the parliament. Moreover, the parliament actually becomes
    an important center for making political decisions', - he said. The
    diplomat thinks that despite the popular belief, actually there is the
    opposition in the Armenian parliament. According to the diplomat, the
    opposition is available even because there is Heritage party, being an
    oppositional one from the very beginning. Now, he said, there is
    another oppositional party there - ARFD, and it's another matter that
    the opposition is weakly represented, while any democratic state
    should be interested in having strong opposition. Kapinos emphasized
    that strong opposition makes it possible to form a competitive field
    which catalyzes development of the society.

    Asked about freedom of mass media in the country, the diplomat replied
    that everything is not so bad in Armenia as compared to another
    countries. The real pluralism is available in the country's print
    media, which was evident during the presidential election. "However,
    the international organizations say there are certain problems with
    the electron media, as well as radio and TV broadcasting. And we are
    working in that area. S. Kapinos recalled the decision of the European
    Court on Human Rights on A1+ TV Company. "An OSCE Representative on
    Freedom of the Media is expected to visit Yerevan in May.

    We have information that the issue of A1+ will be on agenda. We think
    that A1+ should be allowed to take part in the upcoming contest for
    broadcast license. This participation must be in conformity with exact
    procedures, and all the international organizations, including OSCE,
    will observe the process, S. Kapinos said. "A two-year moratorium on
    provision of frequencies is currently in force, so, A1+ cannot take
    part in any tenders. This moratorium expires in July, 2010, and legal
    basis is now developed for conduct of new tenders for TV-frequencies,"
    the diplomat said.
Working...
X