Tweet
Hurriyet, Turkey
April 9 2010
The nuclear security summit and Namık Tan resumes his post
Friday, April 9, 2010
ILHAN TANIR
U.S. President Obama will be hosting an unprecedented nuclear security
summit in Washington on April 12 and 13. Obama, after passing health
care reform in Congress, received a big boost in his standing. And
after this historic achievement, he now wants to go on a roll by
building international consensus on a variety of nuclear
non-proliferation issues, as well as he is hoping to find some
solidarity among the international actors against Iran's misbehavior.
In the last couple of weeks, the Obama administration has signed a new
Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, or START, with the Russians to cut
both countries' nuclear arsenals by one-third.
The Obama administration also released its New Nuclear Posture Review,
or NPR, last Tuesday, and declared to the world that he is radically
narrowing down the conditions under which the U.S. could use nuclear
weapons.
Obama spelled out his `nuclear dream' almost a year ago in Prague for
the first time. In that speech, Obama said he would work to reduce the
role of nuclear weapons in the U.S.'s National Security Policy and
eventually work to fully eliminate nuclear weapons from the face of
the Earth, even though he will probably not see such a goal realized
in his life.
In both of these cases, START and NPR, Obama has been criticized by
the left and right on the domestic political spectrum. The liberals
think that already Nobel Peace Prize winner Obama did not go far
enough (such as Michael Levi). And the conservatives think that Obama
is weakening the country by putting too many constraints on its
biggest deterrence policy (like Tunku Varadarajan.)
On the other hand, Obama is realistic enough to see that he needs
two-thirds of a majority of the Senate to ratify international
treaties such as START, and it means that as long as he does not
secure some of the Republican support, however big the promises he
wishes to extend to world, he will end up failing at home.
The nuclear security summit that will start on Monday also stems from
another goal that was set in Prague a year ago by Obama, which was to
do more to prevent nuclear arsenals from falling into the hands of
non-state actors.
Turkey will be attending the summit as well, but not because it has
much to say on the topic, but because it sits at the U.N. Security
Council and its proximity to Iran.
While the Turkish Prime Minister visibly increased his anti-sanctions
posture recently, according to the latest reports, China and Russia
have been moving slowly to support some kind of sanctions against
Iran. The final version of the sanctions will not be tough or as
`biting' as America or more importantly like Israel wishes to see,
according to experts. Still it looks like we are headed to a voting
day at the U.N. Security Council this spring.
Will there be a bilateral meeting?
While it took some time for the prime minister of Turkey, Tayyip
ErdoÄ?an, to make his decision to participate in the summit, following
this decision to visit, the Turkish side expected to secure a
`bilateral' meeting with Obama. When the White House Press Secretary
Robert Gibbs announced that Obama would have a one-to-one meeting with
the president of Armenia, Serge Sarkisian, but not with ErdoÄ?an, it
felt like another cold shower for the Turkish delegation that is
gearing up to leave for Washington.
I reached a senior White House official after Gibbs announced that
there would be no meeting bilaterally or trilaterally with Turkey. The
senior official, who wanted to stay anonymous, confirmed the
no-meeting news but added that "[they] expect the president will have
a chance to talk with PM ErdoÄ?an as they will be seated next to each
other at one of the events."
Namik Tan, who was recalled after the resolution of "genocide" passage
at the key House Committee last month, returned to Washington Tuesday
night, and had some meetings at the White House the next day.
Mr. Tan, during his meeting in the White House, along with other
issues, raised the issue of `bilateral' meetings as well, but the
reaction he received from the White House was the same reaction that I
received from the senior White House official a day before.
Though I must add, the Turkish diplomats believe that there will be a
`bilateral' meeting between Obama and ErdoÄ?an at the end, even though
the current ambiguity is a bulky annoyance.
The meeting between the Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan and Armenian
leader Sarkisian is already agreed on, but still the parties are
working on the details.
ErdoÄ?an recently sent his special envoy, Mr. Feridun Sinirlioglu, to
Erivan to deliver a letter. According to people who know the
developments first hand, the `meetings in Erivan went well."
The Turkish administration also believes that "there are some hopeful
signs in terms of reaching a some kind of understanding over the
Karabakh issue" with Armenia. The reaction from Armenians is not the
same. Instead, the Armenian side insists that the Karabakh issue was
not even addressed before and during the signing of protocols last
year, according to daily Radical.
Different Armenian officials have constantly given the same message
with the backing of the U.S. and many other European countries in
recent months, which is that they already did enough work for the
protocols and rest is up to the Turkish administration. "It is
impossible to ratify protocols before April 24," says the Turkish
side, while the Armenian diaspora is increasing pressure and lobbying
the White House in run up to the April 24.
`Nuclear option' for genocide?
>From various discussions in circles in Washington recently, there is
another option being implied to handle the issue of `genocide' in
Turkey. I would call this `thinking' the `nuclear option' and it
basically suggests Turkey consider what would happen if it changes its
official view of the 1915 events, which it does not see as genocide
currently. This option is not valid before the 24 April apparently,
but can be put into perspective in times to come.
Omer Taspinar, director of the Turkey Program at the Brookings
Institution, a Washington based think tank, gave one of the most
`straight' talks of this option in Washington at the Gulenist Rumi
Forum last week. Taspinar suggested that Turkey has not compromised
yet as Armenia did during the `normalization process.' According to
Taspinar, Turkey should come to terms with regarding to the events of
1915 as well.
TaÅ?pınar also predicted in a phone conversation later on that, "there
is a 99 percent chance that, this year like the last year, President
Obama will cite the normalization process between Turkey and Armenia
and avoid using the word of genocide while he will give his annual
Armenian Remembrance Day statement on April 24."
April 9 2010
The nuclear security summit and Namık Tan resumes his post
Friday, April 9, 2010
ILHAN TANIR
U.S. President Obama will be hosting an unprecedented nuclear security
summit in Washington on April 12 and 13. Obama, after passing health
care reform in Congress, received a big boost in his standing. And
after this historic achievement, he now wants to go on a roll by
building international consensus on a variety of nuclear
non-proliferation issues, as well as he is hoping to find some
solidarity among the international actors against Iran's misbehavior.
In the last couple of weeks, the Obama administration has signed a new
Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, or START, with the Russians to cut
both countries' nuclear arsenals by one-third.
The Obama administration also released its New Nuclear Posture Review,
or NPR, last Tuesday, and declared to the world that he is radically
narrowing down the conditions under which the U.S. could use nuclear
weapons.
Obama spelled out his `nuclear dream' almost a year ago in Prague for
the first time. In that speech, Obama said he would work to reduce the
role of nuclear weapons in the U.S.'s National Security Policy and
eventually work to fully eliminate nuclear weapons from the face of
the Earth, even though he will probably not see such a goal realized
in his life.
In both of these cases, START and NPR, Obama has been criticized by
the left and right on the domestic political spectrum. The liberals
think that already Nobel Peace Prize winner Obama did not go far
enough (such as Michael Levi). And the conservatives think that Obama
is weakening the country by putting too many constraints on its
biggest deterrence policy (like Tunku Varadarajan.)
On the other hand, Obama is realistic enough to see that he needs
two-thirds of a majority of the Senate to ratify international
treaties such as START, and it means that as long as he does not
secure some of the Republican support, however big the promises he
wishes to extend to world, he will end up failing at home.
The nuclear security summit that will start on Monday also stems from
another goal that was set in Prague a year ago by Obama, which was to
do more to prevent nuclear arsenals from falling into the hands of
non-state actors.
Turkey will be attending the summit as well, but not because it has
much to say on the topic, but because it sits at the U.N. Security
Council and its proximity to Iran.
While the Turkish Prime Minister visibly increased his anti-sanctions
posture recently, according to the latest reports, China and Russia
have been moving slowly to support some kind of sanctions against
Iran. The final version of the sanctions will not be tough or as
`biting' as America or more importantly like Israel wishes to see,
according to experts. Still it looks like we are headed to a voting
day at the U.N. Security Council this spring.
Will there be a bilateral meeting?
While it took some time for the prime minister of Turkey, Tayyip
ErdoÄ?an, to make his decision to participate in the summit, following
this decision to visit, the Turkish side expected to secure a
`bilateral' meeting with Obama. When the White House Press Secretary
Robert Gibbs announced that Obama would have a one-to-one meeting with
the president of Armenia, Serge Sarkisian, but not with ErdoÄ?an, it
felt like another cold shower for the Turkish delegation that is
gearing up to leave for Washington.
I reached a senior White House official after Gibbs announced that
there would be no meeting bilaterally or trilaterally with Turkey. The
senior official, who wanted to stay anonymous, confirmed the
no-meeting news but added that "[they] expect the president will have
a chance to talk with PM ErdoÄ?an as they will be seated next to each
other at one of the events."
Namik Tan, who was recalled after the resolution of "genocide" passage
at the key House Committee last month, returned to Washington Tuesday
night, and had some meetings at the White House the next day.
Mr. Tan, during his meeting in the White House, along with other
issues, raised the issue of `bilateral' meetings as well, but the
reaction he received from the White House was the same reaction that I
received from the senior White House official a day before.
Though I must add, the Turkish diplomats believe that there will be a
`bilateral' meeting between Obama and ErdoÄ?an at the end, even though
the current ambiguity is a bulky annoyance.
The meeting between the Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan and Armenian
leader Sarkisian is already agreed on, but still the parties are
working on the details.
ErdoÄ?an recently sent his special envoy, Mr. Feridun Sinirlioglu, to
Erivan to deliver a letter. According to people who know the
developments first hand, the `meetings in Erivan went well."
The Turkish administration also believes that "there are some hopeful
signs in terms of reaching a some kind of understanding over the
Karabakh issue" with Armenia. The reaction from Armenians is not the
same. Instead, the Armenian side insists that the Karabakh issue was
not even addressed before and during the signing of protocols last
year, according to daily Radical.
Different Armenian officials have constantly given the same message
with the backing of the U.S. and many other European countries in
recent months, which is that they already did enough work for the
protocols and rest is up to the Turkish administration. "It is
impossible to ratify protocols before April 24," says the Turkish
side, while the Armenian diaspora is increasing pressure and lobbying
the White House in run up to the April 24.
`Nuclear option' for genocide?
>From various discussions in circles in Washington recently, there is
another option being implied to handle the issue of `genocide' in
Turkey. I would call this `thinking' the `nuclear option' and it
basically suggests Turkey consider what would happen if it changes its
official view of the 1915 events, which it does not see as genocide
currently. This option is not valid before the 24 April apparently,
but can be put into perspective in times to come.
Omer Taspinar, director of the Turkey Program at the Brookings
Institution, a Washington based think tank, gave one of the most
`straight' talks of this option in Washington at the Gulenist Rumi
Forum last week. Taspinar suggested that Turkey has not compromised
yet as Armenia did during the `normalization process.' According to
Taspinar, Turkey should come to terms with regarding to the events of
1915 as well.
TaÅ?pınar also predicted in a phone conversation later on that, "there
is a 99 percent chance that, this year like the last year, President
Obama will cite the normalization process between Turkey and Armenia
and avoid using the word of genocide while he will give his annual
Armenian Remembrance Day statement on April 24."