Tweet
TURKISH-ARMENIAN RAPPROCHEMENT: THE END OF A LONG BEGINNING
Qantara (Dialogue with Islamic World)
http://www.qantara.de/webcom/show_article.p hp/_c-476/_nr-1322/i.html
April 28 2010
Germany
A dialogue between Armenians and Turks on the Armenian genocide
appears to be an impossible prospect - but academics on both sides
are showing that the opposite is the case. Wolfgang Gust reports
A dialogue between Armenians and Turks on the Armenian genocide
appears to be an impossible prospect - but academics on both sides
are showing that the opposite is the case. Wolfgang Gust reports
Whenever Armenians and Turks discuss the Armenian genocide in
the German public arena, the clash is pre-programmed. Turkish
representatives attempt to silence their opposite numbers with the
same old arguments, while Armenian representatives insist on Turkish
recognition of the genocide as a pre-condition for any dialogue. But
there is another way of approaching the matter.
In early April, researchers working on the Armenian genocide met for
a workshop at Boston's Clark University in the US. Among them were -
as usual - the most well-informed Armenians and - a first in recent
times - the most well-informed Turks.
Organisers of the event were Taner Akcam, holder of the Clark
University Kaloosdian/Mugar Chair, the only professorship in Armenian
Genocide Studies in the US, as well as the Strassler Center for
Holocaust and Genocide Studies.
Co-sponsors were the "National Association for Armenian Studies
and Research" with Marc Mamigonian, as well as the US specialist on
genocide and modern German history at the University of Minnesota,
Eric Weitz.
The workshop focused on the Armenian genocide, and paid special
attention to its documentation in archives scattered across the world,
but also the question of how further research into the genocide should
be conducted.
On the way to normalisation
The event was a display of academic diversity; the lectures, the
discussion and even - in fact perhaps primarily - the diverging views
were highly informative. The Turkish academics made an excellent
contribution to the debate. One became witness to a process of
normalisation.
"We have a long road behind us, and an even longer road ahead of us,"
said Taner Akcam in summary. All participants had "experienced the
end of the beginning," he added.
This genocide is now no longer first and foremost the domain of
Armenian researchers, he said. European, American and Turkish
researchers in various disciplines also attended the workshop as
a way of integrating the subject into their own deliberations and
comparative studies of genocide, ethnic cleansing and crimes against
humanity. "This development will lead to higher standards in the
field of genocide research," said Akcam.
The genocide of Armenians is not portrayed globally from a unilateral
point of view, as many Turks maintain, but completely unambiguously -
and Turks who are interested in knowing the truth are making an ever
greater contribution to this presentation.
Shortly before the workshop, my wife and I released a new edition of
some 350 German Foreign Ministry files titled "Deportation Plans"
on our Internet portal www.armenocide.net, which focuses on the
publication of official documents.
These documents are hand-written, barely legible and therefore largely
unknown files on Armenians working for Germany. In addition to a
lack of civil courage on the part of the Germans, they primarily
show what Turkish officialdom disputes energetically to this day:
the power that enabled the Young Turk movement to decide on the fate
of each and every Armenian.
Only rudimentary details can be gleaned from the German files on
what role provincial authorities and local committees of Young Turks
played in this process. But just exactly what their role was in the
genocide was described by Ayhan Aktar, Turkish professor of sociology
at Istanbul's Bilgi University, in his workshop lecture. Documents
from the Foreign Office of Germany and Aktar's analysis of the Ottoman
administration provide very valuable insights into what was actually
happening on the ground at the time.
Academic cloak for sham version
Instead, the US genocide denier Professor Justin McCarthy, whose views
have long been disputed, was sent by Turkey to travel the length and
breadth of the country in a bid to drape an academic cloak over the
official Turkish sham version of events.
But many Turks now view the issue quite differently - thanks to recent
events in Turkey itself: increasing numbers of Turkish grandmothers
who reveal themselves as Armenians to their shocked grandchildren
shortly before they die, a Nobel prize winner who hauls the state
before the courts for refusing to concede that this was genocide,
an Armenian-Turkish intellectual murdered by the nationalist Hydra
and whose coffin was followed by vast crowds of mourners chanting:
"We are all Hrant Dink!" Turkey is waking up.
Over the past five years, the Turkish world as I perceive it has
undergone significant change. While my audience consisted almost
exclusively of Armenians, after I published my first book on the
genocide in the year 1993, now the majority are Turkish. They want
to know what really happened back then.
Three years ago, a Turkish spectator asked me after a public conference
in Berlin how he could verify my claims, which he doubted were true. I
referred him to my previously published book containing hundreds of
German Foreign Ministry documents on the genocide.
A few weeks ago, I heard back from this man, a Turkish national in
his mid-50s. We met up, and he told me his story: whenever possible,
once a week, he had been going to the political archive at the foreign
ministry to compare the files.
He told me that he had then realised that it was all true. He went
on to study further documents and made almost 800 pages of notes -
in Turkish. Many of the additional files that he had read were unknown
to me.
My interlocutor had almost outstripped me in his understanding of
the German documents. And of course, he was no longer the slightest
bit doubtful that the events of 1915/16 represented a classic case
of genocide.
Tentative dialogue
A grassroots movement has formed in the US and in Istanbul, which is
pursuing a clearly-defined goal: to meet up with Armenians, drink
tea together and to talk - to dispel all awkwardness and seek out
the truth about those years during World War One.
These people call themselves "Friends of Hrant Dink". In Germany,
the name "Projekt 2015" is under consideration. Ahead of the
100th anniversary of the start of the genocide, the children and
grandchildren of the victims and perpetrators want to have fathomed
one of the most terrible chapters in Ottoman history. And get to know
each other again.
For the first time, Turks, Kurds and Armenians have joined together
this year to remember the events of 24 April 1915, when members of the
Armenian elite in the Ottoman Empire were arrested and for the most
part killed. It is the beginning of a period of joint remembrance -
and, as recognised in Boston, the end of a long road for Turks in
particular.
Will the Armenians go with them? At the Clark Workshop Ron Suny,
Director of the Eisenberg Institute for Historical Studies at the
University of Michigan, complained that the Armenians have thus far
been too nationalistic.
This agitated the doyen of research into Armenia, Richard Hovannisian,
who said that even as a convinced Armenian patriot, he was also obliged
to find the truth. A dialogue would be possible with this approach.
Turkish ultras are in the process of losing their decades-long
dominance. Some two hundred Turks and several Armenians attended
an event in Frankfurt, Germany, to which a Turkish association had
invited Taner Akcam and myself.
Then half a dozen neatly dressed young men appeared. "There they are,"
a Turkish man said to me and pointed to the group. These were the Turks
who still dominated the scene a decade ago, and who now appeared as
almost stigmatised outsiders: Kemalists, once courted by the Soviets,
now representatives of an antiquated nationalism.
They are still trying to avert their failure, and are now even cozying
up to Armenian hardliners who are also not interested in dialogue.
The next few years will show whether the Turks, Kurds and Armenians
who are ready for dialogue can take the decisive step that researchers
of both nations have already sealed in Boston.
Wolfgang Gust
© Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung / Qantara.de 2010 Translated from
the German
Wolfgang Gust worked as an editor at "Der Spiegel" until 1993. His
book "Der Völkermord an den Armeniern 1915/16. Dokumente aus dem
Politischen Archiv des deutschen Auswärtigen Amts" (The Genocide
against the Armenians 1915/16. Documents from the Political Archive at
the German Foreign Ministry) was published in 2005 by Klampen Verlag.
Qantara (Dialogue with Islamic World)
http://www.qantara.de/webcom/show_article.p hp/_c-476/_nr-1322/i.html
April 28 2010
Germany
A dialogue between Armenians and Turks on the Armenian genocide
appears to be an impossible prospect - but academics on both sides
are showing that the opposite is the case. Wolfgang Gust reports
A dialogue between Armenians and Turks on the Armenian genocide
appears to be an impossible prospect - but academics on both sides
are showing that the opposite is the case. Wolfgang Gust reports
Whenever Armenians and Turks discuss the Armenian genocide in
the German public arena, the clash is pre-programmed. Turkish
representatives attempt to silence their opposite numbers with the
same old arguments, while Armenian representatives insist on Turkish
recognition of the genocide as a pre-condition for any dialogue. But
there is another way of approaching the matter.
In early April, researchers working on the Armenian genocide met for
a workshop at Boston's Clark University in the US. Among them were -
as usual - the most well-informed Armenians and - a first in recent
times - the most well-informed Turks.
Organisers of the event were Taner Akcam, holder of the Clark
University Kaloosdian/Mugar Chair, the only professorship in Armenian
Genocide Studies in the US, as well as the Strassler Center for
Holocaust and Genocide Studies.
Co-sponsors were the "National Association for Armenian Studies
and Research" with Marc Mamigonian, as well as the US specialist on
genocide and modern German history at the University of Minnesota,
Eric Weitz.
The workshop focused on the Armenian genocide, and paid special
attention to its documentation in archives scattered across the world,
but also the question of how further research into the genocide should
be conducted.
On the way to normalisation
The event was a display of academic diversity; the lectures, the
discussion and even - in fact perhaps primarily - the diverging views
were highly informative. The Turkish academics made an excellent
contribution to the debate. One became witness to a process of
normalisation.
"We have a long road behind us, and an even longer road ahead of us,"
said Taner Akcam in summary. All participants had "experienced the
end of the beginning," he added.
This genocide is now no longer first and foremost the domain of
Armenian researchers, he said. European, American and Turkish
researchers in various disciplines also attended the workshop as
a way of integrating the subject into their own deliberations and
comparative studies of genocide, ethnic cleansing and crimes against
humanity. "This development will lead to higher standards in the
field of genocide research," said Akcam.
The genocide of Armenians is not portrayed globally from a unilateral
point of view, as many Turks maintain, but completely unambiguously -
and Turks who are interested in knowing the truth are making an ever
greater contribution to this presentation.
Shortly before the workshop, my wife and I released a new edition of
some 350 German Foreign Ministry files titled "Deportation Plans"
on our Internet portal www.armenocide.net, which focuses on the
publication of official documents.
These documents are hand-written, barely legible and therefore largely
unknown files on Armenians working for Germany. In addition to a
lack of civil courage on the part of the Germans, they primarily
show what Turkish officialdom disputes energetically to this day:
the power that enabled the Young Turk movement to decide on the fate
of each and every Armenian.
Only rudimentary details can be gleaned from the German files on
what role provincial authorities and local committees of Young Turks
played in this process. But just exactly what their role was in the
genocide was described by Ayhan Aktar, Turkish professor of sociology
at Istanbul's Bilgi University, in his workshop lecture. Documents
from the Foreign Office of Germany and Aktar's analysis of the Ottoman
administration provide very valuable insights into what was actually
happening on the ground at the time.
Academic cloak for sham version
Instead, the US genocide denier Professor Justin McCarthy, whose views
have long been disputed, was sent by Turkey to travel the length and
breadth of the country in a bid to drape an academic cloak over the
official Turkish sham version of events.
But many Turks now view the issue quite differently - thanks to recent
events in Turkey itself: increasing numbers of Turkish grandmothers
who reveal themselves as Armenians to their shocked grandchildren
shortly before they die, a Nobel prize winner who hauls the state
before the courts for refusing to concede that this was genocide,
an Armenian-Turkish intellectual murdered by the nationalist Hydra
and whose coffin was followed by vast crowds of mourners chanting:
"We are all Hrant Dink!" Turkey is waking up.
Over the past five years, the Turkish world as I perceive it has
undergone significant change. While my audience consisted almost
exclusively of Armenians, after I published my first book on the
genocide in the year 1993, now the majority are Turkish. They want
to know what really happened back then.
Three years ago, a Turkish spectator asked me after a public conference
in Berlin how he could verify my claims, which he doubted were true. I
referred him to my previously published book containing hundreds of
German Foreign Ministry documents on the genocide.
A few weeks ago, I heard back from this man, a Turkish national in
his mid-50s. We met up, and he told me his story: whenever possible,
once a week, he had been going to the political archive at the foreign
ministry to compare the files.
He told me that he had then realised that it was all true. He went
on to study further documents and made almost 800 pages of notes -
in Turkish. Many of the additional files that he had read were unknown
to me.
My interlocutor had almost outstripped me in his understanding of
the German documents. And of course, he was no longer the slightest
bit doubtful that the events of 1915/16 represented a classic case
of genocide.
Tentative dialogue
A grassroots movement has formed in the US and in Istanbul, which is
pursuing a clearly-defined goal: to meet up with Armenians, drink
tea together and to talk - to dispel all awkwardness and seek out
the truth about those years during World War One.
These people call themselves "Friends of Hrant Dink". In Germany,
the name "Projekt 2015" is under consideration. Ahead of the
100th anniversary of the start of the genocide, the children and
grandchildren of the victims and perpetrators want to have fathomed
one of the most terrible chapters in Ottoman history. And get to know
each other again.
For the first time, Turks, Kurds and Armenians have joined together
this year to remember the events of 24 April 1915, when members of the
Armenian elite in the Ottoman Empire were arrested and for the most
part killed. It is the beginning of a period of joint remembrance -
and, as recognised in Boston, the end of a long road for Turks in
particular.
Will the Armenians go with them? At the Clark Workshop Ron Suny,
Director of the Eisenberg Institute for Historical Studies at the
University of Michigan, complained that the Armenians have thus far
been too nationalistic.
This agitated the doyen of research into Armenia, Richard Hovannisian,
who said that even as a convinced Armenian patriot, he was also obliged
to find the truth. A dialogue would be possible with this approach.
Turkish ultras are in the process of losing their decades-long
dominance. Some two hundred Turks and several Armenians attended
an event in Frankfurt, Germany, to which a Turkish association had
invited Taner Akcam and myself.
Then half a dozen neatly dressed young men appeared. "There they are,"
a Turkish man said to me and pointed to the group. These were the Turks
who still dominated the scene a decade ago, and who now appeared as
almost stigmatised outsiders: Kemalists, once courted by the Soviets,
now representatives of an antiquated nationalism.
They are still trying to avert their failure, and are now even cozying
up to Armenian hardliners who are also not interested in dialogue.
The next few years will show whether the Turks, Kurds and Armenians
who are ready for dialogue can take the decisive step that researchers
of both nations have already sealed in Boston.
Wolfgang Gust
© Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung / Qantara.de 2010 Translated from
the German
Wolfgang Gust worked as an editor at "Der Spiegel" until 1993. His
book "Der Völkermord an den Armeniern 1915/16. Dokumente aus dem
Politischen Archiv des deutschen Auswärtigen Amts" (The Genocide
against the Armenians 1915/16. Documents from the Political Archive at
the German Foreign Ministry) was published in 2005 by Klampen Verlag.