Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANALYSIS-Armenia-Turkey Peace Collapse Fans Caucasus Tension

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANALYSIS-Armenia-Turkey Peace Collapse Fans Caucasus Tension

    ANALYSIS-ARMENIA-TURKEY PEACE COLLAPSE FANS CAUCASUS TENSION
    By Matt Robinson

    Reuters
    April 29 2010

    * Nagorno-Karabakh dispute to simmer on

    * Azerbaijan, energy hub courted by West,reconsiders US ties

    * Both Armenia and Azerbaijan weakened

    TBILISI, April 29 (Reuters) - The collapse of a plan to end a
    century of hostility between Armenia and Turkey may have its biggest
    repercussions in the dispute over Nagorno-Karabakh, a flashpoint near
    a corridor bringing oil and gas to the West.

    The peace initiative between two of the players in a complex web of
    relationships in the south Caucasus crumbled last week when Armenia
    suspended ratification of the accord. [ID:nLDE63L25B] [ID:nLDE63L0RW]

    Observers said the pact, which would have established diplomatic
    relations and opened their land border, was already deadlocked as
    neither parliament had approved the deal.

    But its suspension has left another, potentially explosive issue
    hanging in the balance -- the fate of Nagorno-Karabakh, a mountainous
    region lost by Azerbaijan to Armenian-backed forces in the bloodiest
    of the ethnic conflicts that accompanied the 1991 collapse of the
    Soviet Union.

    Many had hoped normalised relations between Armenia and Turkey would
    help unlock talks on the enclave, which has run its own affairs with
    the support of Armenia since splitting away from Azerbaijan. It is
    connected to Armenia by a slim corridor.

    Azerbaijan, a close Turkish ally and energy trading partner, saw the
    accord as a betrayal, potentially robbing it of leverage over Armenia
    in negotiations on Nagorno-Karabakh.

    Analysts say the suspension will do little to soothe Azeri concerns.

    "The process has left Azerbaijan isolated, and effectively pulled the
    rug from under its foreign policy framework," said Svante Cornell of
    the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute.

    "It also leaves Armenia's leadership weakened. thus -- more frustration
    and more insecurity, the last thing the region needs," he said.

    The deal agreed a year ago was the closest Turkey and Armenia had
    come to moving past the World War One mass killing of Armenians by
    Ottoman Turks that has poisoned their relationship.

    The United States and Russia both backed the accord as a means of
    stabilising the south Caucasus and encouraging greater trade and
    prosperity.

    Turkey stood to reap diplomatic kudos in the West as it bids for
    membership of the European Union. Landlocked Armenia would have
    benefited from the reopening of its western frontier, closed by Turkey
    in 1993 in solidarity with Azerbaijan.

    Washington said last week the deal was not dead, but more time might
    be needed to "create some new momentum".

    But diplomats say they see little chance of Turkey dropping its demand
    for Armenian concessions on Nagorno-Karabakh, or of Armenia complying
    in exchange for an open frontier.

    STRAINED AZERI-TURKISH TIES

    The peace overtures have severely strained ties between Turkey and
    Azerbaijan, affecting negotiations on gas supplies key to the planned
    Nabucco pipeline, which aims to bypass Russia to supply gas to the
    European Union.

    Azerbaijan late last year struck deals to sell more gas to Russia,
    whose South Stream pipeline project is the main rival to Nabucco. such
    deals will draw supplies away from Nabucco and make it harder for
    the project to get off the ground. [ID:nLDE63P1OD]

    In the belief that Washington was the main driver of the
    Turkish-Armenian thaw, Azerbaijan this month cancelled joint military
    exercises with the United States and threatened to reconsider their
    "strategic relationship". [ID:nLDE63F16X]

    "Long-term peace and normalisation of relations in the south Caucasus
    cannot be achieved by rewarding aggression and by excluding the
    region's strategically most important country," Novruz Mammadov,
    chief foreign policy adviser to Azeri President Ilham Aliyev, wrote
    last week.

    An estimated 30,000 people died in the Nagorno-Karabakh war before
    a ceasefire was agreed in 1994. More than 15 years of mediation by
    Russia, the United States and France have yielded a loose framework of
    "basic principles", but no peace deal.

    Snipers and landmines on the frontline meanwhile pick off young Azeri
    and Armenian conscripts on a regular basis.

    Intensified negotiations last year between Aliyev and Armenian
    President Serzh Sarksyan fuelled hope that some sort of solution
    might be close.

    The International Crisis Group thinktank warned this month of a
    threat from "domestically entrenched maximalist forces" opposed to
    a Nagorno-Karabakh deal in Armenia and Azerbaijan.

    "If the talks fail now, Armenia and Azerbaijan may find themselves
    trapped in a spiralling military escalation which will have
    unpredictable consequences for both countries and for wider regional
    security," ICG analyst Tabib Huseynov wrote.

    Thanks to its elevated position and heavy fortifications, military
    experts say Nagorno-Karabakh would be difficult to retake. But that
    has not stopped Azerbaijan from spending heavily on its military and
    frequently threatening to try.

    "The Azerbaijan army has all capabilities to hit any target on the
    territory of Armenia if necessary," Defence Minister Safar Abiyev
    said last week.

    A resumption in hostilities could quickly suck in other powers in a
    region criss-crossed by energy pipelines.

    Russia's largest military base outside its borders is located in
    armenia, and the two countries are close allies. (Editing by Sonya
    Hepinstall)

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X