Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ACNIS Assesses Recent Unrest in Kyrgyzstan: Lessons For Armenia?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ACNIS Assesses Recent Unrest in Kyrgyzstan: Lessons For Armenia?

    PRESS RELEASE
    Armenian Center for National and International Studies
    75 Yerznkian Street
    Yerevan 0033, Armenia
    Tel: (+374 - 10) 52.87.80 or 27.48.18
    Fax: (+374 - 10) 52.48.46
    Email: [email protected] or [email protected]
    Website: www.acnis.am


    April 29, 2010


    ACNIS Assesses the Recent Unrest in Kyrgyzstan:
    Are There Lessons For Armenia?


    Yerevan--Following the recent unrest in Kyrgyzstan that resulted in
    the resignation of President Kurmanbek Bakiev's government, the
    Armenian Center for National and International Studies (ACNIS) today
    convened a roundtable discussion to analyze the situation in
    Kyrgyzstan and to assess the implications, if any, for Armenia. The
    roundtable was attended by over forty guests, including
    representatives from the diplomatic community, international
    organizations and a number of prominent Armenians experts, analysts
    and journalists.

    Extending his greetings to the participants, ACNIS Administrative
    Director Dr. Karapet Kalenchian noted that `the events in Kyrgyzstan
    are of serious concern for the post-Soviet countries, including
    Armenia and its ruling circles.' In Kalenchian's view, `it has now
    become clear that `stability,' about which our authorities like to
    talk a lot, can be breached very quickly and unexpectedly. And in the
    case of Armenia, which is surrounded by enemies, this peril is
    increased twofold.'

    The first presentation was by Grzegorz Michalski, the Head of the
    Politico-Military Programme at the OSCE Office in Yerevan, who offered
    a broad overview of the situation in Kyrgyzstan. Although his
    comments were unofficial and did not necessarily represent the
    position of the OSCE, he noted the geopolitical significance of
    Kyrgyzstan and also discussed the role of the country's two foreign
    military bases, the American base at Manas and the Russian military
    base at Kant. He stressed that `the strategic interest by many
    outside powers, like Russia and the US, means that events in
    Kyrgyzstan are especially important.' He also added that `the
    establishment of stability and security are the most serious
    challenges now facing the new Kyrgyz government.' Michalski has
    extensive experience in the region and is recognized as an expert on
    Turkey. He has also served as the Head of the OSCE Mission's
    Tskhinvali Field Office.

    Following Michalski, ACNIS Senior Analyst Manvel Sargsian analyzed,
    from several angles, the large-scale turmoil that started in
    Kyrgyzstan on April 7, 2010, and the process that led to the Kyrgyz
    government's overthrow. According to Sargsian, these events first and
    foremost are qualitatively different than the post-election `velvet
    revolutions' of the years past. `It is difficult to say that what
    occurred was an ordinary political revolution, because it resulted in
    the collapse of the country's entire state system,' he noted. `In
    actual fact, what happened in Kyrgyzstan is a people's insurrection,
    and the new forces that came to power have little impact on the
    people's frame of mind. In addition, the events in Kyrgyzstan are
    devoid of the `Western trace,' which has now become fairly ordinary
    and, in principle, a new political phenomenon is evident whose
    repercussions can later be felt in other post-Soviet countries.'

    For his part, ACNIS Director Richard Giragosian presented an analysis
    of the unrest in Kyrgyzstan and noted that the main reasons for the
    uprising stemmed from three factors. First, the Kyrgyz people were
    seriously disappointed by the failure of the Bakiev government to keep
    its promises to implement real democratic reform and fight corruption.
    Second, the population's demands for real change and greater democracy
    were ignored by the Kyrgyz authorities. And third, the mounting
    pressure from the country's economic crisis only fueled the people's
    desperation for change. `Most significantly, each of these three
    factors is now present in Armenia as well, although to varying
    degrees. And these are the lessons for Armenia from what happened in
    Kyrgyzstan,' Giragosian warned.

    The presentations were then followed by a series of questions and
    answers, and featured a lively exchange among the discussants.

    ------------------------------------ ---------------------------------

    The Armenian Center for National and International Studies (ACNIS) is
    a leading independent strategic research center located in Yerevan,
    Armenia. As an independent, objective institution committed to
    conducting professional policy research and analysis, ACNIS strives to
    raise the level of public debate and seeks to broaden public
    engagement in the public policy process, as well as fostering greater
    and more inclusive public knowledge. Founded in 1994, ACNIS is the
    institutional initiative of Raffi K. Hovannisian, Armenia's first
    Minister of Foreign Affairs. Over the past fifteen years, ACNIS has
    acquired a prominent reputation as a primary source of professional
    independent research and analysis covering a wide range of national
    and international policy issues.

    For further information on the Center call (37410) 52-87-80 or
    27-48-18; fax (37410) 52-48-46; email [email protected] or [email protected];
    or visit www.acnis.am

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X