ANALYST FROM KARABAKH: MATTHEW BYZA'S EXAMPLE AND EXPERIENCE DID GOOD TO FRENCH DIPLOMAT
ArmInfo
2010-07-28 18:06:00
ArmInfo. "It is hardly worth responding to OSCE Minsk Group French
Co-chair Bernard Fassier's statements reanimated by the Azerbaijani
mass media, taking into account the fact that they were made in March
2010 and Fassier will shortly resign",- said Karabakh analyst Hayk
Haroutyunyan to ArmInfo when commenting on the French co-chair's
statements on the ways of Karabakh conflict settlement.
"As regards his statements that the Kosovo conflict cannot become a
precedent for Nagorno-Karabakh, the French co-chair has said nothing
new. His words that the Kosovo conflict is a conflict inside a state
and the Karabalkh conflict is a conflict between two states Armenia
and Azerbaijan are affecting. Being a co- chairman of the OSCE Minsk
Group, he hardly failed to realize the core of the conflict. Here one
can speak about not the dilettantism, but the partiality of the French
diplomat",- said the analyst. He thinks that Fassier's statements
may also have sordid motives. "Probably, Matthew Byza's example and
experience did good to French diplomat",- he said. At the same time,
the analyst expressed hope that "Mr. Co- chairman, who has displayed
carefulness and tactfulness in his statements over his term in
co-chair's office, will keep this line before resigning". "As regards
the issue deployment of international peacekeeping forces touched
on by Fassier, no examples, even such a bright one as the Kosovo
example, will be unable to persuade Karabakh to give its consent to
their deployment in the region. There are a lot of arguments against
the deployment, and not a single one - for it", he stressed.
From: A. Papazian
ArmInfo
2010-07-28 18:06:00
ArmInfo. "It is hardly worth responding to OSCE Minsk Group French
Co-chair Bernard Fassier's statements reanimated by the Azerbaijani
mass media, taking into account the fact that they were made in March
2010 and Fassier will shortly resign",- said Karabakh analyst Hayk
Haroutyunyan to ArmInfo when commenting on the French co-chair's
statements on the ways of Karabakh conflict settlement.
"As regards his statements that the Kosovo conflict cannot become a
precedent for Nagorno-Karabakh, the French co-chair has said nothing
new. His words that the Kosovo conflict is a conflict inside a state
and the Karabalkh conflict is a conflict between two states Armenia
and Azerbaijan are affecting. Being a co- chairman of the OSCE Minsk
Group, he hardly failed to realize the core of the conflict. Here one
can speak about not the dilettantism, but the partiality of the French
diplomat",- said the analyst. He thinks that Fassier's statements
may also have sordid motives. "Probably, Matthew Byza's example and
experience did good to French diplomat",- he said. At the same time,
the analyst expressed hope that "Mr. Co- chairman, who has displayed
carefulness and tactfulness in his statements over his term in
co-chair's office, will keep this line before resigning". "As regards
the issue deployment of international peacekeeping forces touched
on by Fassier, no examples, even such a bright one as the Kosovo
example, will be unable to persuade Karabakh to give its consent to
their deployment in the region. There are a lot of arguments against
the deployment, and not a single one - for it", he stressed.
From: A. Papazian