Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AAA: Court Rules Against Genocide Deniers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AAA: Court Rules Against Genocide Deniers

    PRESS RELEASE
    For Immediate Release
    Armenian Assembly of America
    August 12, 2010
    Contact: Press Department
    Email: [email protected]
    Phone: (202) 393-3434

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS RULES AGAINST DENIERS OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE

    Retired Associate Justice of the Supreme Court David Souter Writes Decision

    Washington, DC - In a unanimous opinion written by retired Associate
    Justice of the Supreme Court David Souter, sitting on a three judge
    panel including Michael Boudin and Jeffery R. Howard of the United
    States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in the Commonwealth of
    Massachusetts, today affirmed the decision of a lower court dismissing
    the Griswold v. Driscoll case, in which plaintiffs argued for the
    inclusion of genocide denial literature in the Massachusetts human
    rights curriculum, reported the Armenian Assembly of America
    (Assembly).

    The suit filed in 2005 under the guise of a First Amendment case by
    the Assembly of Turkish American Associations (ATAA) and its
    supporters hoped to undermine the teaching of the Armenian Genocide in
    public schools by inserting genocide denial literature in the state
    mandated curriculum. ATAA was joined in its campaign by the Turkish
    American Legal Defense Fund, whose principal spokesperson, Bruce Fein,
    is one of the most vocal deniers of the Armenian Genocide. The
    Court's decision effectively marks a major defeat for deniers.

    The court explicitly ruled against ATAA for waiting so long to
    complain, and ruled against the individual plaintiffs on First
    Amendment and standing grounds. Significantly, the court decided that
    the Guide on Armenian Genocide instruction fit into the curriculum
    classification rather than a school library, and even if the school
    library cases did apply, that law would not allow the genocide denial
    actions that the plaintiffs sought.

    The plaintiffs' attorney Harvey Silverglate took the position that
    "contra-genocide" websites should be included in the curriculum,
    overlooking the inherent contradiction of "contra-genocide"
    information, which does hold a position on the Armenian Genocide by
    disputing or denying it. Silverglate also failed to advise the court
    that the websites in question, whether of the ATAA or the Turkish
    Embassy, display brazenly denialist pages on the Armenian Genocide,
    therein holding yet again a very distinct view of history,
    disqualifying them as either pedagogically objective or scholarly.

    "The Court of Appeals' decision is a major victory for sound education
    on the Armenian Genocide. The Court defended free speech today and
    struck a blow to the spurious tactics used by genocide deniers to
    engage under the pretext of debate. It was especially disturbing that
    the plaintiffs took to distorting the U.S. Constitution in court and
    after in public," said Van Z. Krikorian, Assembly Board of Trustees
    Counselor.

    "I want to thank the Commonwealth's Attorney General Martha Coakley,
    Assistant Attorney General William W. Porter who defended the
    Massachusetts Department of Education, Aram Kaloosdian, as well as
    Duke University School of Law Professor Erwin Chemerinsky, who along
    with Arnold R. Rosenfeld of K&L Gates LLP, joined in filing the first
    amicus brief in 2006 on behalf of Armenian Genocide survivors and
    descendants of survivors," added Krikorian.

    In December 2009, the Armenian Assembly filed another amicus curiae
    (friend of the court) brief in support of the Commonwealth, when the
    ATAA and its supporters appealed the June 2009 decision by District
    Judge Mark L. Wolf.

    In its brief, the Armenian Assembly stated that: "This lawsuit is an
    unprecedented attempt by the plaintiffs to utilize the federal courts
    as a vehicle for their unconstitutional intrusion into educational
    policy in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. It is motivated by the
    plaintiffs' claim based on its historically and educationally
    unsupported assertions, that there is a credible position that the
    Armenian Genocide did not occur, and therefore that view point should
    be part of the Curriculum Guide on teaching about the Armenian
    Genocide issued by the state Department of Education."

    "The Armenian Assembly appreciates the court's ruling in this matter.
    It sends a clear message to Turkey and its revisionist allies that
    history cannot be rewritten to further Ankara's state-sponsored denial
    campaign," said Assembly Board of Trustees Chairman Hirair Hovnanian.
    Carolyn Mugar, the Board's President, added, "Given the overwhelming
    historical and legal evidence documenting the incontestable fact of
    the Armenian Genocide, this ruling is a victory for all those
    concerned about genocide education and prevention."

    "The International Association of Genocide Scholars, the Armenian Bar
    Association and all others who filed amicus briefs should be
    congratulated for standing up for the truth and for the importance of
    human rights education," added Hovnanian, "and the Assembly thanks
    them again for addressing this serious challenge to freedom of
    expression, human dignity, and educational integrity."

    Established in 1972, the Armenian Assembly of America is the largest
    Washington-based nationwide organization promoting public
    understanding and awareness of Armenian issues. The Assembly is a
    501(c) (3) tax-exempt membership organization.

    ###

    NR# 2010-060




    From: A. Papazian
Working...
X