Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Georgian, the most beautiful race

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Georgian, the most beautiful race

    Cyprus Mail, Cyprus
    Feb 7 2010


    Georgian, the most beautiful race

    By Hermes Solomon
    Published on February 7, 2010


    ARE WE blinded by our purported origins, blind as Homer the turtle,
    who had his eyes removed as a punishment for getting caught in a Greek
    fisherman's nets?

    Interestingly, Ban Ki-moon, on his recent visit to Cyprus, did not
    once refer to us as Greek and Turkish Cypriots. `I'm here to show my
    personal support to the Cypriot-led talks to reunify the country,' he
    said.

    And much to the dismay of the south, he crossed the Green Line and
    treated Mehmet Ali as Demetris' equal, inscrutable Oriental that he
    is; Caucasian he certainly isn't!

    The concept of a Caucasian race was developed around 1800 by Johann
    Friedrich Blumenbach, a German scientist and classical anthropologist,
    and named after the peoples from the Caucasus region, whom he
    considered to be the archetype for the grouping. He based this
    classification on craniology and wrote:

    `I have taken the name of this variety from Mount Caucasus, both
    because its neighbourhood, and especially its southern slope, produce
    the most beautiful race of men, I mean the Georgian. And, because all
    physiological reasons converge to this, we ought to place the
    autochthones (birth place) of mankind in that region.'

    This classification is highly controversial today and rejected by many
    academics and political activists, who view any system of categorising
    humanity based on physiognomy as 19th century racism.

    You cannot tell a book by its cover, but you can make an educated
    guess at someone's race by his looks. In Cyprus we are brown eyed in
    the main, then green/grey and finally some few blue, mostly olive
    alongside the ruddy and fair skinned, the rotund outnumbering the slim
    and the short outnumbering the tall; auburn hair colour predominates
    discounting the dye hard light beige of most of the island's `classy'
    women, who believe the lighter the colour the more north-western
    European they look. There are those, like my good friend, who claims
    manner of dress can distinguish most any nationality...

    But in truth, we cannot deny any amount of adulteration of our so
    called Greek/Turkish origins: Semitic, Roman, Egyptian, Frank,
    Genovese, Venetian and now British, yes, British. Many second and
    third generation Anglo Cypriots are married to one. I was. My brother
    still is and we have eight children between us. Such are we a mix of
    different peoples that my claim to Greekness abides solely in the
    church.

    The Church of Cyprus, part of the wider Greek Orthodox Church, is an
    autocephalous body within the communion of Orthodox Christianity. It
    is one of the oldest autocephalous churches, achieving independence
    from the Patriarchate of Antioch in 431AD. Its founder, St Barnabas
    was from the Holy Land, and Antioch is near the modern city of
    Antakya, close to the Turkish/Syrian border.

    Due to millennia of crossbreeding, our so-called Achaean origins
    (3,000 years ago) have been diluted to give us a president who looks
    anything but Greek and a leader of the House of Representatives whose
    father was of Armenian extraction ` Armenia being a part of the
    Caucasus, producing the second most beautiful race of men.

    History depends on who writes it and from which angle one reads it.
    Affirming our uniquely Greek or Turkish origins requires a stretch of
    the imagination only found in Cyprus. And just what do we mean by
    Greek, the Glory that was or the bankrupt nation that is? And by
    Turkish do we refer to Kemal Ataturk's reunification of a country and
    its people or today's human rights fiasco?

    What's wrong with being simply Cypriot, a race of mixed tribes
    emanating mostly from Asia Minor and the Middle East?

    Had the Phoenician, Hittite or Assyrian civilisations gone on to be
    more renowned than Ancient Greece's, would we be claiming our origins
    as Lebanese or Syrian? At the time of Our Lord, most of the coastal
    regions of Asia Minor and the Middle East spoke a form of Greek, yet
    none claim Greek origin today.

    When, a year or more ago, a prominent Cypriot football club went to
    Athens to play a return match against a prominent Greek club, Greek
    supporters were heard to shout, `Go home, Turkish donkeys!' or words
    to that effect. Strangely, I did not take exception to my fellow
    countrymen being called Turkish ` but donkeys...?

    I have twice visited Olympia and stood mesmerized by the statue of
    Hermes sculpted by Praxiteles, a third larger than life-size and
    perfect in every detail. Wish as I might to resemble my namesake, I
    look nothing like him. My mother, who chose this unchristian name,
    suffered from delusions of grandeur.

    Great names from the past do not make great men of their present day
    owners, and a nation's true origins are indefinable. All is forever in
    a state of flux. There was a time when we were all monkeys and the
    planet a single land mass.

    Cypriots today claim their religious origins proudly, but Greeks and
    Turks we are not. By perpetuating this illusion we brought about the
    partition of the island.

    Perhaps our polemical Archbishop Chrysostomos II might wish to comment...

    http://www.cyprus-mail.com/opinions/ge orgian-most-beautiful-race/20100207

    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X