Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

EDM: Turkmen Gas to Russia and Iran

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • EDM: Turkmen Gas to Russia and Iran

    Eurasia Daily Monitor


    Thursday, January 7, 2010-Volume 7, Issue 4



    IRAN AND TURKMENISTAN INAUGURATE GAS PIPELINE

    by Vladimir Socor

    On January 6 in Dauletabad, Presidents Gurbanguly Berdimuhammedov
    and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad inaugurated a pipeline that runs from that giant
    Turkmen gas field to Iran. The government of Turkey is also interested
    in that project; and Turkish Energy Minister Taner Yildiz attending the
    event conferred with the Turkmen and Iranian presidents and energy
    officials on gas supplies.

    The pipeline's inauguration was the centerpiece but not
    the only event during Ahmadinejad's two-day visit (January 5 and
    6) in Turkmenistan. An agreement was also signed to start work on the
    Turkmen section of a planned railroad from Kazakhstan to Iran. The
    Iranian president had arrived in Turkmenistan directly from Tajikistan,
    where his visit underscored Dushanbe's and Tehran's
    mutual interest in close neighborly relations. Tajikistan's
    President Emomali Rahmon hailed those relations as did his counterpart
    Berdimuhammedov in Ashgabat (Tajik TV, January 4; Turkmen TV, January 5,
    6).

    In both visits, Ahmadinejad toned down or refrained altogether
    from anti-Western rhetoric; the internationally monitored Turkmen and
    Tajik state media reported no such rhetoric from the Iranian president.

    The new pipeline, Dauletabad-Sarahs-Khangiran, with a throughput
    capacity of 12 billion cubic meters (bcm) annually, will operate at 6
    bcm in 2010 and should reach full capacity the following year. This
    pipeline from southeastern Turkmenistan complements the Korpeje-Kurt Kui
    line (laid in 1997) that runs from southwestern Turkmenistan to Iran,
    with 8 bcm in annual capacity. Thus, Turkmenistan and Iran should
    henceforth be able to trade 20 bcm of gas annually.

    Iran's purchase price for Turkmen gas is not disclosed
    officially. On one occasion in 2008 Ashgabat halted deliveries amid
    disagreements over the price, during a cold-weather snap in Iran. That
    brief halt caused Iran to reduce its gas deliveries to Turkey at peak
    consumption time.

    Turkmenistan's Dauletabad field traditionally supplied the
    lion's share of Turkmen gas deliveries to Russia, until Moscow
    stopped all its imports of Turkmen gas in April 2009. Russia is resuming
    imports this month at a level of only 10 bcm for 2010, down from the
    previous annual average of 45 bcm (see EDM, December 15, 16, 18, 2008;
    January 4, 2009).

    Ashgabat and Tehran responded promptly to that situation. They
    agreed in July 2009 to build the Dauletabad-Sarahs-Khangiran pipeline
    and completed it in only six months. The pipeline runs for 182
    kilometers, including some 30 km in Turkmenistan and approximately 150
    km. in Iran. This transmission line connects with Iran's
    internal supply network at the Khangiran gas processing plant and
    distribution center in Iran's Khorasan province.

    Iran uses Turkmen gas partly for supplying northern Iranian
    provinces and partly for swapping gas to Turkey. Meager volumes that
    Iran supplies to Armenia are also imported or swapped from Turkmenistan.

    Ankara is keen to see Turkmen gas reaching Iran in growing
    volumes. Turkey is interested in receiving more Turkmen gas via Iran, or
    Iranian gas freed up by Turkmen deliveries. As Minister Yildiz told
    Berdimuhamedov and Ahmadinejad during this event, Turkey can use those
    added volumes partly for its own consumption and also for the Nabucco
    pipeline project to Europe. Yagshigeldi Kakayev, the head of
    Turkmenistan's State Agency for Management and Use of Natural
    Resources, told Yildiz that `Turkmen gas will reach Turkey as
    alternative routes develop' (Anatolia news agency, January 5, 6;
    Trend, January 7).

    Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan had discussed these
    issues during his October 2009 visit to Tehran while also reaching out
    politically to Ahmadinejad. Agreements of intent signed on that occasion
    include exploration, production, and transportation of Iranian natural
    gas, notwithstanding US sanctions in that sector (see EDM, December 11,
    2009). Turkey is interested in receiving future Turkmen gas production
    volumes via Iran irrespective of the situation with trans-Caspian
    transportation, and potentially to that project's detriment.

    An agreement was also signed in Ashgabat on January 6 for
    construction of the Turkmen section of the planned
    Kazakhstan-Turkmenistan-Iran railroad. Under this agreement, the Islamic
    Development Bank shall provide funding for initial work on the
    Bereket-Etrek line. The overall project envisages building a railroad
    from Uzgen in Kazakhstan, via Gyzylgaya-Bereket-Etrek in Turkmenistan,
    to Gorgan in Iran (Turkmen government website, IRNA, January 6).

    Links between Turkmenistan and Iran are multiplying. The
    Tejen-Sarahs-Mashhad railway line is operating between the two
    countries, as is the Dostluk water reservoir in the border area. On
    December 9 the two governments also inaugurated a jointly built gas
    storage and transportation terminal at Gylanly on Turkmenistan's
    Caspian coast (Turkmen TV, December 10, 2009, January 5, 2010).

    --Vladimir Socor




    Monday, January 4, 2010-Volume 7, Issue 1


    RUSSIA RESUMING GAS IMPORTS FROM TURKMENISTAN ON A SMALL SCALE

    by Vladimir Socor

    On December 22 in Ashgabat, Presidents Dmitry Medvedev of Russia
    and Gurbanguly Berdimuhammedov of Turkmenistan witnessed the signing of
    documents on the bilateral gas trade and transportation. The documents
    mark the end of Russia's punitive, nine-month halt of gas
    imports from Turkmenistan. The halt inflicted severe losses on
    Turkmenistan's revenues.

    However, Russia's monopsony is now lost thanks to the
    opening of Turkmenistan-China and Turkmenistan-Iran pipelines (see EDM,
    December 15, 16, 18). Russia is returning in a diminished role to an
    intensifying contest for Turkmen gas.

    Gazprom's Vice-President Aleksandr Medvedev and Turkmengaz
    Chairman Nury Muhammedov signed the sale-and-purchase agreement in the
    presence of the two heads of state (Interfax, December 22, 23).
    According to a subsequent announcement by Gazprom spokesman Sergey
    Kupryanov, deliveries would start on January 9, rather than January 1
    (Interfax, December 31).

    Under the agreement, Turkmenistan would deliver `up
    to' 30 billion cubic meters (bcm) annually to Russia from 2010
    onward. However, the agreement does not specify the delivery volume for
    2010, let alone subsequent years. Nor does the agreement envisage any
    time-frame for reaching the nominal 30 bcm target. According to Russian
    business press reports, Gazprom's 2010 budget has earmarked
    funds for purchasing only 10.5 bcm of Turkmen gas this year (Vedomosti,
    December 23).

    Gazprom's purchase price for Turkmen gas is not disclosed
    officially. The new agreement pegs that price to the oil-products
    basket, potentially approximating European netback prices for Russian
    gas. According to unofficial reports, Gazprom's purchase price
    is anticipated to range from $220 to $250 per one thousand cubic meters
    of Turkmen gas during 2010 (Vedomosti, Vremya Novostei, December 23).

    President Medvedev claimed at the signing ceremony that this
    agreement is not a new one, but merely updates the 2003 Russian-Turkmen
    agreement on the gas trade for the period 2004-2028. Gazprom's
    official announcements follow the same line and the document itself is
    billed as `amendments and addenda to the basic contract'
    of 2003. Such claims seek to maintain the illusion that Russia retains
    some kind of priority claim on Turkmenistan's future gas
    production.

    That 25-year agreement of intent had been misrepresented as a
    `contract' by Gazprom to discourage European involvement
    with Turkmenistan. It had envisaged Turkmen gas deliveries to Russia
    rising from some 40 bcm in 2004 to 90 bcm annually from 2010 onward.
    Russia, however, proved unable to implement that agreement, thereby
    implicitly invalidating it. Gazprom imported some 45 bcm of Turkmen gas
    per year on average, downscaled that to 42 bcm in the binding annual
    contract for 2009, and stopped unilaterally the import of Turkmen gas in
    early April 2009 due to falling demand in Russia and Europe.
    Consequently, Russia imported only 11.3 bcm of Turkmen gas in 2009, all
    of it until early April (ITAR-TASS, December 22; Vedomosti, December
    23).

    Furthermore, the arrangements for 2010 reduce Russia's
    intake of Turkmen gas to a fraction of what it was, without stating an
    intention to revert to the former volumes, let alone the former
    projections. Those projections at 90 bcm per year far exceed pipeline
    capacities currently at Gazprom's disposal in Central Asia. For
    all these reasons, Gazprom would have been in massive breach of contract
    with Turkmenistan, had the 2003 framework agreement been a
    `contract' as claimed.

    Also on December 22, Presidents Medvedev and Berdimuhammedov
    witnessed the signing of a document of intent on joint pipeline
    construction projects. One project, the Caspian coastal pipeline, would
    run from western Turkmenistan's gas fields via Kazakhstan to
    Russia. The other project, the East-West pipeline, would connect eastern
    Turkmenistan's gas fields with western Turkmenistan. There are
    no specifics about throughput capacities, companies involved, investment
    costs, or ultimate export destinations for either project (Interfax,
    December 22, 23).

    The Caspian coastal pipeline forms the subject of an earlier
    agreement of intent and an inter-governmental agreement, each of them
    signed during 2007 by Russia with Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan. Projected
    at 30 to 40 bcm annually, that line was to increase dramatically the
    overall capacity of the old Central Asia-Center pipeline system,
    enabling Russia to maximize its intake of Turkmen gas in the future
    (though well behind the schedule of the 2003 agreement of intent).
    Russia has been unable to move that project off the ground since 2007.
    If built, the Caspian coastal pipeline could absorb the gas production
    of international companies from the Caspian offshore and send that
    production to Russia, instead of the planned trans-Caspian route to
    Azerbaijan and southern corridor to Europe.

    The East-West pipeline across Turkmenistan would carry future gas
    production from the country's giant, as yet undeveloped fields
    to the Caspian shore. Depending on who would finance and build it, that
    line could plug either into the Caspian coastal pipeline bound for
    Russia, or into a trans-Caspian pipeline bound for Europe. The Kremlin
    had initiated the cross-Turkmenistan pipeline project on its own terms
    and proposed it to Berdimuhammedov. The Turkmen president, however,
    announced in April 2009 an international tender for bids to construct
    that pipeline. Many bids are said to have been registered since then.

    Russia's continuing quest for Turkmen gas--and apparent
    readiness to pay realistic prices for it--reflects Moscow's
    anticipation of shortfalls in Russian gas production in the post-crisis
    recovery period. Those shortfalls would affect Gazprom's
    capacity to meet export commitments, requiring a substantial offset
    through imports from Turkmenistan. In the short term, Russia is content
    with importing relatively small volumes of Turkmen gas at 10 bcm this
    year, while leaving open the possibility of importing `up
    to' 30 bcm when European demand rebounds. However, China and
    even Iran are vying with Russia for the existing and future volumes of
    Turkmen gas exports, while international companies such as the German
    RWE proceed with development offshore.

    --Vladimir Socor
Working...
X