Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Turkey's Refusal To Ratify Protocols A Betrayal Of International Com

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Turkey's Refusal To Ratify Protocols A Betrayal Of International Com

    TURKEY'S REFUSAL TO RATIFY PROTOCOLS A BETRAYAL OF INTERNATIONAL COMMITMENTS, SAYS ICG EXPERT

    Asbarez
    Jan 15th, 2010

    YEREVAN (ArmRadio)-Turkey will have betrayed its commitments to
    Armenia and the international community if it fails to quickly
    ratify fence-mending agreements signed with Armenia last October,
    according to an analyst at the International Crisis Group (ICG),
    the Azeri Trend News Agency reported Friday.

    "If Turkey doesn't pass the protocols in Parliament in the coming
    months, but Armenia does, it will look like Turkey betrayed its
    commitments," explained Sabine Freizer, ICG's Europe Program Director.

    The two countries' foreign ministers signed two protocols for
    establishing diplomatic relations and opening borders on October 10,
    2009. The documents, which require Armenia to agree to a historical
    commission on the Genocide and recognize its de-facto border with
    Turkey, have been highly unpopular among Armenians in the homeland
    and Diaspora.

    The Armenian Constitutional Court on January 12 ruled in favor of
    the agreements, paving the way for Armenia's parliament to begin
    debates on their ratification. Turkey, however, continues to holdup
    ratification of the documents, saying that Armenia must first agree
    to a settlement of the Karabakh conflict in Azerbaijan's favor before
    it's parliament can debate the protocols.

    Ankara needs to make progress on its relations "because of the linkage
    that Turkey, but not Armenia, is making between the protocols and
    Nagorno-Karabakh," Freizer said.

    According to Freizer, however, progress on the Karabakh issue is
    extremely important for Turkey because of "the promises it has made
    to Azerbaijan not to open its border with Armenia until there is
    progress on Karabakh."

    But Turkey's continued stonewalling of the agreements will undermine
    its entire foreign policy agenda, which ostensibly aims to secure
    peace and stability in the South Caucasus, she said, adding that the
    situation is made all the more complicated because Turkey has also
    "committed to Armenia to open the border in the two protocols signed
    last October."

    Freizer believes this is why Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip
    Erdogan implicitly urged the Russians to do more to broker a Karabakh
    settlement during talks on Wednesday with Russian counterpart Vladimir
    Putin. Erdogan told the Russian Premier that Russia can become "the
    most important actor" in the Karabakh peace process.

    Putin in response, publicly told Erdogan during a press conference
    that Turkey should not link the normalization of its relations with
    Armenia to further progress in international efforts to resolve the
    Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. He did, however, reaffirm Moscow's support
    for Turkey's rapprochement with Armenia, his country's main regional.

    "Russia's ability to actually push through an agreement is perhaps
    the strongest among all international players, but remains limited,
    Freizer said. "It is only when the two countries and the two societies
    are ready to accept these basic principles that there would be an
    agreement."

    Freizer said Turkey needs to understand that Russia does not have all
    the keys to the problem. She pointed to a largely hollow agreement
    between Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia in 2008 as an example of
    Russia's limitations in influencing a peace.

    "The Russian Leadership did step in and was successful in getting a
    signature from the two presidents, but this did not change anything
    on the ground or get the sides closer to a comprehensive agreement,"
    she said, adding that a real solution on the basic principles for
    peace will only come from within Armenia and Azerbaijan.

    "I think it is good if there is more high level involvement from the
    OSCE countries including Russia, but again it needs to be accompanied
    by a broader debate in Azerbaijan and in Armenia about the basic
    principles, because it is only when the two countries and the two
    societies are ready to accept these basic principles that there would
    be an agreement," Freizer explained.

    "So, the principles cannot be forced upon Armenia and Azerbaijan
    from Russia or from the US, the societies also need to agree on them
    themselves," she added.
Working...
X