Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Clinton In Crisis Talks With Armenian, Turkish FMs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Clinton In Crisis Talks With Armenian, Turkish FMs

    CLINTON IN CRISIS TALKS WITH ARMENIAN, TURKISH FMS

    Asbarez
    Jan 28th, 2010

    LONDON (RFE/RL)-U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has met with
    her counterparts from Armenia and Turkey to discuss an intensifying
    diplomatic dispute that has raised an additional obstacle to the
    normalization of Turkish-Armenian relations.

    Clinton met with Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu on Wednesday
    and Armenia's Edward Nalbandian the next day on the sidelines of an
    international conference held in London. She was due to hold more
    talks with Davutoglu late on Thursday.

    The Armenian and Turkish ministers had a separate meeting there
    earlier in the day. An Armenian Foreign Ministry spokesman declined
    to give any details, telling RFE/RL only that the conversation was
    very short and impromptu.

    The Turkish Hurriyet Daily News quoted an unnamed Turkish diplomat as
    saying that Davutoglu reiterated Ankara's concerns about the Armenian
    Constitutional Court's interpretation of the normalization "protocols"
    signed by the two governments in Switzerland last October. "The two
    sides had the chance to review their well-known positions. There is
    no change," said the diplomat.

    The two top diplomats already discussed the controversy in a phone
    call last week, with Davutoglu alleging that the Armenian court acted
    against the letter and the spirit of the protocols despite upholding
    their conformity with Armenia's constitution. Nalbandian dismissed
    the Turkish claims as "nonsense" at a news conference on Friday.

    The U.S. State Department likewise disagreed with Ankara's stance.

    Assistant Secretary of State Philip Gordon said late last week that
    Washington regards the court ruling as a "positive step forward in the
    ratification process of the normalization protocols between Turkey and
    Armenia" that "does not appear to limit or qualify them in any way."

    "The court ruling is restrictive," Davutoglu insisted as he spoke to
    Turkish journalists on his way to London on Wednesday. According to
    Hurriyet he also said the Turkish government will substantiate its
    claims in a legal document that will be sent to the U.S. and Swiss
    governments soon.

    Ankara is specifically unhappy with the court's assertion that
    the protocols place no obligations on Yerevan pertaining to the
    Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and do not commit it to stop seeking greater
    international recognition of the Armenian genocide. Turkish officials
    say this runs counter to a protocol clause envisaging the formation
    of a Turkish-Armenian inter-government "subcommission" that would
    look into the 1915 mass killings and deportations of Armenians in
    the Ottoman Empire.

    The Armenian side insists that the would-be panel was never supposed
    to determine whether the massacres constituted genocide. It argues
    that the clause in question stipulates only that the "subcommission"
    shall engage in an "impartial scientific examination of historical
    documents and archives."

    In an interview with Turkish NTV television aired on Tuesday,
    Davutoglu said his government will not take further steps towards
    the protocols' ratification by the Turkish parliament unless its
    concerns are addressed by Armenia and the mediating powers. "We expect
    clear explanations from Armenia regarding the Constitutional Court's
    decision," he said.

    Armenian Justice Minister Gevorg Danielian made clear on Thursday that
    while the authorities in Yerevan may "provide clarifications" of the
    ruling they will take no steps contradicting any of its provisions.

    All of those provisions are equally binding for Armenia's government
    and parliament, he said.

    "If the other side comes up with a position contradicting this [court]
    decision in the process of bilateral relations, then our side must
    naturally refrain from those relations and act solely within the
    framework of Constitutional Court rulings," added Danielian.
Working...
X