Tweet
PAWN FOR THE WRONG PRESIDENT
Donald Wilson Bush
http://www.keghart.com/DWBush_Pawn
6 June 2010
"Lee Hamilton violates his institution's charter by aiding the White
House in appeasing Turkish leaders"
On the surface, the Woodrow Wilson International Center (WWC) for
Scholar's intent to honor Turkish Foreign Minister, Ahmet Davutoglu,
on June 17 th with this year's WWC Public Service Award seems innocent
enough. But, in my opinion, it is not- and those closest to the
situation would certainly agree.
Not least among those in the know are the president and executive
director of the American Hellenic Institute who penned an open letter
to WWC executive director Lee H. Hamilton on May 21, 2010 questioning
the wisdom (but not the motive) of the WWC's choice for receiving
this year's award. I am today, however, questioning the motive as well.
As a direct descendant of Woodrow Wilson's great-grandfather, and a
bearer of the family name (and the President's proud heritage), I have
been careful over 47 years to quietly honor the sacred space between
family privilege and personal politics by purposefully recusing myself
of every good and self-serving opportunity that might dishonor or
misrepresent President Wilson's cherished legacy. I have also watched
closely that the numerous institutions bearing his name do the same.
>>From the family's perspective this is important because institutions
can, and often do (as a result of bureaucratic inertia and personal
compromise) lose connection with the purpose and ideals that once
animated the individual for whom an institution is named.
In the case of knowing what the WWC should stand for, one can find
clues to what animated Woodrow Wilson the man by considering the
catalogue of authorized biographies and Dr. Arthur Link's impressive
pile of presidential papers carefully preserved by the Library of
Congress and published by Princeton University Press.
One can also integrate with this official archive of public
memorabilia, family stories, letters, journal entries, newsprint
pieces, photographs, personal affects and third party correspondence
to find the spark of personal inspiration that animated the president's
dreams. This I have done with Wilson's legacy for nearly three decades
and I will continue to do it for the rest of my life.
>>From a personal perspective such as this, I can easily attest to the
fact that Woodrow Wilson was every bit a poet as he was a politician.
Consequently he was as much motivated by his own Scots-Irish wellspring
of authenticity and substance as he was by his natural instinct for
calculation and ambition. This is important to note because it has
direct bearing on how one should interpret Wilson's attitude toward
the Eurasian minor states that had been suppressed, unjustly attacked
and systematically slaughtered by the Ottoman Turks.
In short, Woodrow Wilson was motivated at his core by a strong sense
of poetic justice and hero projection-in his case born of a strong
predisposition for Christian duty and compassion-that inspired young
men of his day to advocate for the little guy and the underdog.
Although he didn't do this perfectly (his blind eye to the plight
of African Americans is well noted), he did advocate, and advocated
STRONGLY, for the successful emancipation of Eurasian minor states
in the aftermath of WWI. This he did from his core, from his soul,
from his heart. And this unique combination of a scholar's poetic
passion for justice and Truth-wedded with a political statesman's
genius for taking decisive, informed action in the time of national
crisis-is that for which Woodrow Wilson the man is best remembered.
Without question, this fair reflection of Woodrow Wilson's highest
ideals in favor of the underdog, as described above, is also part of
that Wilsonian legacy for which the WWC was specifically chartered
to preserve through their selection of programs, projects, scholars
(and award recipients).
However, with the questionable choice of Ahmet Davutoglu to receive
the WWC's highest award this year, I must now blow the whistle and
redraw a blurred line that protects President Wilson's historic legacy
from the unscrupulous ambitions of those presently representing WWC's
bureaucratic leadership.
May I remind us all of the WWC's charter as reflected in the words
of the WWC mission statement? I quote-the mission of the WWC is "to
commemorate the ideals and concerns of Woodrow Wilson by: providing a
link between the world of ideas and the world of policy; and fostering
research, study, discussion, and collaboration among a full spectrum
of individuals concerned with policy and scholarship in national and
world affairs."
With all the recent blow back from their choice to honor Turkish
Foreign Minister, Ahmet Davutoglu-a figure despised by many Eurasian
people groups and thousands of activists worldwide punished as a
result of his government's unjust domestic and foreign policies-the
present WWC leadership should at least consult President Wilson's
collected papers to see the error in their judgment. For if they do,
they will find clear evidence of what was in the mind of our 28th
president regarding his desire for the people of Eurasia and how,
if he were alive today, he might interpret the idea of promoting
"collaboration among a full spectrum of individuals concerned"
relative to today's US-Turkish foreign policy.
As contained in The Arbitral Award On Turkish-Armenian Boundary,
dated November 22, 1920, we have a record of Wilson's own words: "I
have approached this difficult task with eagerness to serve the best
interests of the Armenian people as well as the remaining inhabitants,
of whatever race or religious belief they may be, in this stricken
country, attempting to exercise also the strictest possible justice
toward the populations, whether Turkish, Kurdish, Greek or Armenian,
living in the adjacent areas."
With this clear record of President Wilson's intent, what could
possibly cause Lee Hamilton and his staff to cow-tow to White House
pressure in this instance of Turkish diplomatic appeasement even at
the cost of dishonoring Woodrow Wilson's personal wishes and thereby
violating the WCC's very own mission and purpose?
Is it simply a matter of Mr. Hamilton playing his part in a
"good-old-boy" insider deal between President Obama's State Department
and the WWC? (That seems plausible given the fact that as the former
chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Hamilton promoted
the careers of many staffers now writing Barack Obama's foreign
policy- namely: Obama foreign policy advisor and deputy national
security advisor Denis McDonough, Director for the Middle East Dan
Shapiro, Obama campaign foreign policy speechwriter turned Deputy
National Security Advisor for Strategic Communications Ben Rhodes,
among others.) [For more details on that see story by foreign policy
reporter Laura Rozen posted May 3, 2010 on Politico.com]
Or could it possibly be a matter of Mr. Hamilton's unwavering American
patriotism and an honest desire to ensure long-term US access to
Turkish military airbases? In the past Turkish leaders have made
veiled threats to alter the US-Turkey relationship should the US
Congress officially recognize the historic truth of Turkey's role in
the Armenian Genocide. Hmmm.
Or perhaps it's simply Mr. Hamilton's heartfelt commitment to free
market economics. With billions of dollars in potential profits
from natural gas pipelines at stake for Wall Street-not to mention
his friend Dick Gephardt's multi-national Turkish lobby partners
at the DC/Atlanta-based Gephardt Group-how much money will be lost
should the US State Department fail to secure Turkey's compliance in
the trillion dollar energy deal? (Google: "Nabucco" "South Stream"
"pipeline" "Russia" to get the full picture.)
In the final analysis, it is most certainly a complex combination of
all these factors that have influenced Mr. Hamilton's decision to do
the President's bidding in this diplomatic business with Turkey.
Sadly, even on a good day in Washington, DC, such blatant accounts
of bureaucratic self-service like Mr. Hamilton's come at a price
to the institutions they serve and the historical legacies they are
chartered to protect.
In this case-even if it is simply a matter of helping out his good
buddy, the President of the United States-Lee H. Hamilton has brought
shame to halls of one of our nation's most cherished and tax-payer
supported institutions by violating its charter in favor of personal
and self-serving ambitions.
Perhaps Mr. Hamilton should consider leaving his post at the WWC first,
then figure out the best way to help his friend.
Donald Wilson Bush is a pragmatic conservative writer, public speaker,
and global advocate for democratic causes. He is a Woodrow Wilson
descendant and a student of the works of the 28th U.S. President. Mr.
Bush can be reached for comment at [email protected]
Related Topic Desecrating President Woodrow Wilson's Legacy by David
Boyadjian.
From: A. Papazian
Donald Wilson Bush
http://www.keghart.com/DWBush_Pawn
6 June 2010
"Lee Hamilton violates his institution's charter by aiding the White
House in appeasing Turkish leaders"
On the surface, the Woodrow Wilson International Center (WWC) for
Scholar's intent to honor Turkish Foreign Minister, Ahmet Davutoglu,
on June 17 th with this year's WWC Public Service Award seems innocent
enough. But, in my opinion, it is not- and those closest to the
situation would certainly agree.
Not least among those in the know are the president and executive
director of the American Hellenic Institute who penned an open letter
to WWC executive director Lee H. Hamilton on May 21, 2010 questioning
the wisdom (but not the motive) of the WWC's choice for receiving
this year's award. I am today, however, questioning the motive as well.
As a direct descendant of Woodrow Wilson's great-grandfather, and a
bearer of the family name (and the President's proud heritage), I have
been careful over 47 years to quietly honor the sacred space between
family privilege and personal politics by purposefully recusing myself
of every good and self-serving opportunity that might dishonor or
misrepresent President Wilson's cherished legacy. I have also watched
closely that the numerous institutions bearing his name do the same.
>>From the family's perspective this is important because institutions
can, and often do (as a result of bureaucratic inertia and personal
compromise) lose connection with the purpose and ideals that once
animated the individual for whom an institution is named.
In the case of knowing what the WWC should stand for, one can find
clues to what animated Woodrow Wilson the man by considering the
catalogue of authorized biographies and Dr. Arthur Link's impressive
pile of presidential papers carefully preserved by the Library of
Congress and published by Princeton University Press.
One can also integrate with this official archive of public
memorabilia, family stories, letters, journal entries, newsprint
pieces, photographs, personal affects and third party correspondence
to find the spark of personal inspiration that animated the president's
dreams. This I have done with Wilson's legacy for nearly three decades
and I will continue to do it for the rest of my life.
>>From a personal perspective such as this, I can easily attest to the
fact that Woodrow Wilson was every bit a poet as he was a politician.
Consequently he was as much motivated by his own Scots-Irish wellspring
of authenticity and substance as he was by his natural instinct for
calculation and ambition. This is important to note because it has
direct bearing on how one should interpret Wilson's attitude toward
the Eurasian minor states that had been suppressed, unjustly attacked
and systematically slaughtered by the Ottoman Turks.
In short, Woodrow Wilson was motivated at his core by a strong sense
of poetic justice and hero projection-in his case born of a strong
predisposition for Christian duty and compassion-that inspired young
men of his day to advocate for the little guy and the underdog.
Although he didn't do this perfectly (his blind eye to the plight
of African Americans is well noted), he did advocate, and advocated
STRONGLY, for the successful emancipation of Eurasian minor states
in the aftermath of WWI. This he did from his core, from his soul,
from his heart. And this unique combination of a scholar's poetic
passion for justice and Truth-wedded with a political statesman's
genius for taking decisive, informed action in the time of national
crisis-is that for which Woodrow Wilson the man is best remembered.
Without question, this fair reflection of Woodrow Wilson's highest
ideals in favor of the underdog, as described above, is also part of
that Wilsonian legacy for which the WWC was specifically chartered
to preserve through their selection of programs, projects, scholars
(and award recipients).
However, with the questionable choice of Ahmet Davutoglu to receive
the WWC's highest award this year, I must now blow the whistle and
redraw a blurred line that protects President Wilson's historic legacy
from the unscrupulous ambitions of those presently representing WWC's
bureaucratic leadership.
May I remind us all of the WWC's charter as reflected in the words
of the WWC mission statement? I quote-the mission of the WWC is "to
commemorate the ideals and concerns of Woodrow Wilson by: providing a
link between the world of ideas and the world of policy; and fostering
research, study, discussion, and collaboration among a full spectrum
of individuals concerned with policy and scholarship in national and
world affairs."
With all the recent blow back from their choice to honor Turkish
Foreign Minister, Ahmet Davutoglu-a figure despised by many Eurasian
people groups and thousands of activists worldwide punished as a
result of his government's unjust domestic and foreign policies-the
present WWC leadership should at least consult President Wilson's
collected papers to see the error in their judgment. For if they do,
they will find clear evidence of what was in the mind of our 28th
president regarding his desire for the people of Eurasia and how,
if he were alive today, he might interpret the idea of promoting
"collaboration among a full spectrum of individuals concerned"
relative to today's US-Turkish foreign policy.
As contained in The Arbitral Award On Turkish-Armenian Boundary,
dated November 22, 1920, we have a record of Wilson's own words: "I
have approached this difficult task with eagerness to serve the best
interests of the Armenian people as well as the remaining inhabitants,
of whatever race or religious belief they may be, in this stricken
country, attempting to exercise also the strictest possible justice
toward the populations, whether Turkish, Kurdish, Greek or Armenian,
living in the adjacent areas."
With this clear record of President Wilson's intent, what could
possibly cause Lee Hamilton and his staff to cow-tow to White House
pressure in this instance of Turkish diplomatic appeasement even at
the cost of dishonoring Woodrow Wilson's personal wishes and thereby
violating the WCC's very own mission and purpose?
Is it simply a matter of Mr. Hamilton playing his part in a
"good-old-boy" insider deal between President Obama's State Department
and the WWC? (That seems plausible given the fact that as the former
chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Hamilton promoted
the careers of many staffers now writing Barack Obama's foreign
policy- namely: Obama foreign policy advisor and deputy national
security advisor Denis McDonough, Director for the Middle East Dan
Shapiro, Obama campaign foreign policy speechwriter turned Deputy
National Security Advisor for Strategic Communications Ben Rhodes,
among others.) [For more details on that see story by foreign policy
reporter Laura Rozen posted May 3, 2010 on Politico.com]
Or could it possibly be a matter of Mr. Hamilton's unwavering American
patriotism and an honest desire to ensure long-term US access to
Turkish military airbases? In the past Turkish leaders have made
veiled threats to alter the US-Turkey relationship should the US
Congress officially recognize the historic truth of Turkey's role in
the Armenian Genocide. Hmmm.
Or perhaps it's simply Mr. Hamilton's heartfelt commitment to free
market economics. With billions of dollars in potential profits
from natural gas pipelines at stake for Wall Street-not to mention
his friend Dick Gephardt's multi-national Turkish lobby partners
at the DC/Atlanta-based Gephardt Group-how much money will be lost
should the US State Department fail to secure Turkey's compliance in
the trillion dollar energy deal? (Google: "Nabucco" "South Stream"
"pipeline" "Russia" to get the full picture.)
In the final analysis, it is most certainly a complex combination of
all these factors that have influenced Mr. Hamilton's decision to do
the President's bidding in this diplomatic business with Turkey.
Sadly, even on a good day in Washington, DC, such blatant accounts
of bureaucratic self-service like Mr. Hamilton's come at a price
to the institutions they serve and the historical legacies they are
chartered to protect.
In this case-even if it is simply a matter of helping out his good
buddy, the President of the United States-Lee H. Hamilton has brought
shame to halls of one of our nation's most cherished and tax-payer
supported institutions by violating its charter in favor of personal
and self-serving ambitions.
Perhaps Mr. Hamilton should consider leaving his post at the WWC first,
then figure out the best way to help his friend.
Donald Wilson Bush is a pragmatic conservative writer, public speaker,
and global advocate for democratic causes. He is a Woodrow Wilson
descendant and a student of the works of the 28th U.S. President. Mr.
Bush can be reached for comment at [email protected]
Related Topic Desecrating President Woodrow Wilson's Legacy by David
Boyadjian.
From: A. Papazian