Tweet
NIKOL PASHINYAN HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT
http://a1plus.am/en/politics/2010/03/4/nikol-p ashinyan
01:43 pm | March 04, 2010
Politics
Nikol Pashinyan's advocates have been presenting the 78-page appeal
for two hours at the Appeals Court.
The advocates don't deny the fact that mass disturbances did take
place in Yerevan on March 1, 2008, but they substantiate that Nikol
Pashinyan had nothing to do with them.
The advocates presented facts and corroborated that not only did
their client have to be acquitted by the first instance court by
Article 316 of the Penal Code, but Part 1 of Article 225.
The appeal also includes testimonies of eyewitnesses who had
informed the preliminary inquirers that Nikol Pashinyan was one of
the organizers of the mass disturbances and had declared that they
were seeing Nikol Pashinyan for the first time in court.
The advocates have also attached the declarations by international
organizations that state that police applied disproportionate force
on March 1.
It is still unclear how the appeal will be examined. Will it be
through cassation or reexamination?
Editor-in-chief of "Haykakan Zhamanak" newspaper Nikol Pashinyan's
advocates fear that the presiding judge Serzhik Avetisyan may surprise
them at any moment.
Let us remind that during the cassation, the sides can only present
the appeals, responses and petitions. In case of reexamination,
the sides have the opportunity to call eyewitnesses.
http://a1plus.am/en/politics/2010/03/4/nikol-p ashinyan
01:43 pm | March 04, 2010
Politics
Nikol Pashinyan's advocates have been presenting the 78-page appeal
for two hours at the Appeals Court.
The advocates don't deny the fact that mass disturbances did take
place in Yerevan on March 1, 2008, but they substantiate that Nikol
Pashinyan had nothing to do with them.
The advocates presented facts and corroborated that not only did
their client have to be acquitted by the first instance court by
Article 316 of the Penal Code, but Part 1 of Article 225.
The appeal also includes testimonies of eyewitnesses who had
informed the preliminary inquirers that Nikol Pashinyan was one of
the organizers of the mass disturbances and had declared that they
were seeing Nikol Pashinyan for the first time in court.
The advocates have also attached the declarations by international
organizations that state that police applied disproportionate force
on March 1.
It is still unclear how the appeal will be examined. Will it be
through cassation or reexamination?
Editor-in-chief of "Haykakan Zhamanak" newspaper Nikol Pashinyan's
advocates fear that the presiding judge Serzhik Avetisyan may surprise
them at any moment.
Let us remind that during the cassation, the sides can only present
the appeals, responses and petitions. In case of reexamination,
the sides have the opportunity to call eyewitnesses.