Tweet
States News Service
March 4, 2010 Thursday
ROHRABACHER'S STATEMENT ON H. RES. 252, AFFIRMATION OF UNITED STATES
RECORD ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE RESOLUTION
WASHINGTON
The following information was released by the office of California
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher:
Let me note that I personally would have preferred that this
resolution not be brought up. It is about events that took place
almost 100 years ago, it is about a crime committed by a government of
a country, the Ottoman Empire, that hasn't existed for nearly 100
years. It is about a crime in which the perpetrators and the victims
are all dead, with a few rare exceptions, 3 are here with us today.
Furthermore, it is an issue that has little or nothing to do with the
United States. With that said this legislation is before us. I have
looked into the history that this legislation comments on. There was
an Armenian uprising in an attempt to gain independence from Ottoman
rule. In that uprising there was wide spread killing of civilians,
both Turks and Armenians. The Ottoman troops suppressed the uprising,
had it ended there, this resolution would not be before us today.
The Ottoman government after putting down the uprising decided to put
an end to what they saw as "the Armenian Problem."
The slaughter that followed, the slaughter of defeated and unarmed
people, mostly non combatants, was a crime, not just against Armenian
but against humanity. So because I am now confronted with voting for a
resolution that is basically truthful, I cannot vote against truth.
I would add this though, this resolution is being supported based on
the belief this will at long last close the book on an issue that
should have been resolved long ago.
My vote and the vote of my colleagues is not intended to create more
conflict, but instead to resolve it. Specifically this is a vote to
set the record straight to get the issue resolved and behind us. This
is not an endorsement of reparations, demanded for which will not
bring healing but open the door to new and widening conflict. This is
not about reparations which will not right a wrong of 100 years ago,
but instead will create more conflicts today. Let us resolve an issue
not open up new conflict.
With that said I will vote for this resolution because it is truthful.
Turkey is a friend and has been a good ally, a nation of Muslims who
represent a democratic and moderate force in the Islamic world. But
because they are important and a friend does not mean we should
refrain from acknowledging the truth, of a long ago crime, because it
will upset a current friend. Germany was important to us in the cold
war. I would certainly have rejected any suggestions that I should
vote against a resolution, acknowledging the holocaust to spare
Germany's feelings. Today we reconfirm our commitment to truth, we
also reconfirm that our friendship with Turkey is strong enough to
withstand an acknowledgment of history as it is.
March 4, 2010 Thursday
ROHRABACHER'S STATEMENT ON H. RES. 252, AFFIRMATION OF UNITED STATES
RECORD ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE RESOLUTION
WASHINGTON
The following information was released by the office of California
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher:
Let me note that I personally would have preferred that this
resolution not be brought up. It is about events that took place
almost 100 years ago, it is about a crime committed by a government of
a country, the Ottoman Empire, that hasn't existed for nearly 100
years. It is about a crime in which the perpetrators and the victims
are all dead, with a few rare exceptions, 3 are here with us today.
Furthermore, it is an issue that has little or nothing to do with the
United States. With that said this legislation is before us. I have
looked into the history that this legislation comments on. There was
an Armenian uprising in an attempt to gain independence from Ottoman
rule. In that uprising there was wide spread killing of civilians,
both Turks and Armenians. The Ottoman troops suppressed the uprising,
had it ended there, this resolution would not be before us today.
The Ottoman government after putting down the uprising decided to put
an end to what they saw as "the Armenian Problem."
The slaughter that followed, the slaughter of defeated and unarmed
people, mostly non combatants, was a crime, not just against Armenian
but against humanity. So because I am now confronted with voting for a
resolution that is basically truthful, I cannot vote against truth.
I would add this though, this resolution is being supported based on
the belief this will at long last close the book on an issue that
should have been resolved long ago.
My vote and the vote of my colleagues is not intended to create more
conflict, but instead to resolve it. Specifically this is a vote to
set the record straight to get the issue resolved and behind us. This
is not an endorsement of reparations, demanded for which will not
bring healing but open the door to new and widening conflict. This is
not about reparations which will not right a wrong of 100 years ago,
but instead will create more conflicts today. Let us resolve an issue
not open up new conflict.
With that said I will vote for this resolution because it is truthful.
Turkey is a friend and has been a good ally, a nation of Muslims who
represent a democratic and moderate force in the Islamic world. But
because they are important and a friend does not mean we should
refrain from acknowledging the truth, of a long ago crime, because it
will upset a current friend. Germany was important to us in the cold
war. I would certainly have rejected any suggestions that I should
vote against a resolution, acknowledging the holocaust to spare
Germany's feelings. Today we reconfirm our commitment to truth, we
also reconfirm that our friendship with Turkey is strong enough to
withstand an acknowledgment of history as it is.