Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Book: Giving Turkey a hard second look

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Book: Giving Turkey a hard second look

    The International Herald Tribune, France
    March 6, 2010 Saturday

    Giving Turkey a hard second look

    by JOSEPH O'NEILL

    ABSTRACT

    In "Rebel Land. Unraveling the Riddle of History in a Turkish Town,"
    Christopher de Bellaigue makes a courageous reappraisal of Turkey.

    FULL TEXT
    Rebel Land. Unraveling the Riddle of History in a Turkish Town. By
    Christopher de Bellaigue. Illustrated. 270 pages. The Penguin Press.
    $25.95; £20.

    In 2005, Christopher de Bellaigue, a British journalist, installed
    himself in a remote, forbidding Turkish town and, by so doing,
    acquired an anguished intimacy with the region's peoples and their
    secret and mythic pasts. This extraordinary intervention - which can
    be read as old-fashioned Orientalism or, more generously, as a
    globalized conscience courageously at work or, most accurately, as a
    bit of both - has a reflexive subplot, namely Mr. de Bellaigue's own
    intellectual and moral odyssey, which is of an unusually vulnerable
    and romantic character.

    As Mr. de Bellaigue freely explains in ''Rebel Land,'' a love affair
    drew him to Turkey in 1995, whereupon ''the love affair ended but
    Turkey captivated me.'' He stayed (in Ankara and Istanbul, writing for
    The Economist), learned to speak Turkish fluently and, immersed in a
    Westernized environment, more or less unwittingly became a Kemalist,
    which is to say, a subscriber to the ''foundation myths'' promulgated
    by Kemal Ataturk and holding sway in Turkey ever since.

    Notable among these are the notions that the Turkish republic is a
    nation-state containing no subgroups with valid claims to ethnic or
    political differentiation, let alone autonomy; that the country has a
    European and secular essence and destiny; and, more emotionally, that
    the achievement of Turkish nationhood was an enterprise reflective of
    a righteous people who to this day remain victimized by the
    self-interested incomprehension of the West.

    Mr. de Bellaigue in 2001 wrote an article for The New York Review of
    Books containing a blandly pro-Turkish account of the fate of the
    Ottoman Armenians. To Mr. de Bellaigue's somewhat surprising surprise,
    this excited a furious response. The controversy led the writer to a
    searching, shameful examination of his sources and his soul: ''I had
    been charmed by the Turks, and perhaps intimidated by their blocking
    silence'' about the Armenians. ''I had helped to keep Turkey's past
    hidden.''

    It may strike some as odd that a leading authority on modern Turkey
    should be capable of such a blunder; an honest scrutiny of the
    plentiful and detailed accounts of the 1915 events provided by
    (overwhelmingly Christian) bystanders and survivors makes the case for
    an Armenian genocide hard to resist. On any view of the available
    materials - the Ottoman archives remain largely forbidden to scholars
    - the Armenians suffered a comprehensive and horrifying ethnic
    cleansing from their ancient homeland.

    But Mr. de Bellaigue had failed to scrutinize these materials, for the
    simple reason that he had, more or less literally, gone native. It was
    only after he left Istanbul for Tehran (prompted by another, happier
    love affair, with an Iranian who is now his wife) that his Turkish
    ties began to shrivel and he came to realize he was ''no longer a
    Turk.'' By 2005, he was ready to make amends for his offenses against
    history, even if he would thereby go behind Turkey's back ''and betray
    it.''

    The betrayal took the form of repeated visits to ''a little place in
    the middle of nowhere'' named Varto, and in this way Mr. de Bellaigue
    climbed ''down from the crow's nest of history'' to a place where
    ''the science of history has been so abused and neglected ... that it
    barely exists.'' Varto, we learn, is an exceedingly complicated place.
    Situated in Turkey's beautiful, mountainous far east, in the early
    20th century it was controlled in short succession by the Ottomans,
    Russian invaders, Armenian nationalists and Kurdish rebels. Nowadays
    the town and surrounding district are populated by Kurds, a very few
    vestigial Armenians and a small minority of Turks.

    This ethnic complexity is aggravated by tribal divisions (among the
    Kurds) and by an unruly spillage of religions. Most Varto Kurds are
    Sunni Muslims, others are members of the oppressed Alevi sect; ditto
    the Turks. The Armenians of Varto are Muslims (their Ottoman ancestors
    having prudentially converted from Christianity). Local speech is also
    a hodgepodge.

    Mr. De Bellaigue responds with outstanding energy and courage. Lodging
    at Varto's Teachers' Hostel, he is tailed by the police and military
    intelligence and suspected of being a spy. Nonetheless, he perseveres,
    talking to, on the one hand, the captain of the gendarmerie, the
    police chief and the district governor and, on the other hand,
    herdsmen and Kurdish guerrilla fighters. He tracks down descendants of
    famous and infamous figures in Varto history, and in Germany, he
    speaks to exiled Kurdish nationalists. He constructs an unflinching
    and painstaking history of the local Armenian apocalypse and
    deconstructs the Kurds' inevitably shaky versions of their past.

    If one thing becomes clear, it's that the region, indeed Turkey
    itself, is buried in a thick ethnographic and historical cloud that is
    only deepened by its various inhabitants, who, in this regard, are
    helpless particles of fog. The people of Varto are smothered by the
    official narratives of the Turkish state, credulous of family and
    tribal lore and guerrilla propaganda, subdued by censorship and
    hypersensitized by inherited and actual grievances. Their sense of
    themselves and their neighbors is built on vagueness, prejudice,
    misconceptions, hearsay and, above all, fear. Fear is general all over
    Turkey.

    Mr. De Bellaigue investigates this mess brilliantly and evenhandedly
    (if occasionally emotively). Analytically, however, he can be abrupt.
    He describes Varto as ''a place under occupation'' before concluding,
    a little too tersely, that the ''Kurdish movement in Turkey ... is a
    mirage.''

    With regard to that hottest of potatoes, the Armenians, he deplores as
    ''a travesty of history and memory'' the divisive obsession with the
    question of genocide: ''What is needed is a vaguer description for the
    events of 1915, avoiding the G-word but clearly connoting criminal
    acts of slaughter, to which reasonable scholars can subscribe,''
    thereby promoting ''a cultural and historical meeting between today's
    Turks, Kurds and Armenians.'' This is an important and potentially
    attractive suggestion, but Mr. de Bellaigue declines to elaborate its
    moral and philosophical foundations; a pity, since he has earned the
    reader's trust.

    It's a sense of trust, though, that ''Rebel Land'' ultimately
    bequeaths - a rare, remarkable feat, given the treacherousness of the
    terrain. Mr. de Bellaigue concludes his personal story with the
    information that, having wandered restlessly among ''the tall stalks
    of identity,'' fatherhood has returned him to England and to a new
    appreciation of his citizenship. That may be so; but whatever his
    protestations to the contrary, his heart remains part Turkish. And
    Turkey, however much it may not like it, is lucky to have Christopher
    de Bellaigue. This book ought to be compulsory reading from Batman to
    Bodrum.
Working...
X