Tweet
BY ANY MEANS: THE LATIMES AND KURDISH COVERAGE
By Garen Yegparian
http://www.asbarez.com/78059/la-times-k urdish-coverage/
Mar 8th, 2010
In this third of what started as a three part series on LATimes
coverage of interest to Armenians, I'll address some Kurdish-topic
patterns I noticed over the past two-plus years.
Arguably, the Kurds have fared best among the peoples of Armenia's
neighbors. Certainly, they had more coverage, at least in terms
of number of pieces, than anyone else, other than possibly Iran
(I have not tracked the latter). But, those pieces overwhelmingly
involved conflict. Whether it was Turkey attacking the PKK, the PKK
responding, the ramifications of these in Iraq and southern Kurdistan,
or the political growth pains of the federal structure in Iraq as it
impacts the Kurds- coverage stemmed from blood or fierce politics.
Even those stories not directly involving Iraq-Kurd and Turkey-PKK
issues were conflictual, e.g. Kurdish protests or persecution in
Turkey, Kurds denying responsibility for a bombing, and murders
attributed to a "tribal vendetta" in Kurd-inhabited parts of Turkey.
Plus, the one editorial regarding Turkish-PKK interactions favored
Turkey. There is no coverage of Turkey's abuses of Kurds' human
rights, no "picture" of daily life in Turkish occupied Armenia and
Kurdistan. There is the occasional piece about or reference to (in
coverage not specifically about the Kurds) "look at the progress in
northern Iraq". Basically, the paper seems to be toeing the State
Department's line. No one would call the LATimes pro-Kurdish.
These establishment-based and "if it bleeds it leads" biases do a
disservice to readers. For Armenians, it is, I suppose better than
nothing that some trickle of information about our "cousins" intrudes
upon our awareness to supplement what the Armenian media provides.
But this pathetic coverage of the largest stateless nation on the
planet leads to perpetual uninformedness of Kurdish reality among U.S.
citizens (as I have no doubt other major newspapers are similarly
deficient), in turn leading to less than optimal Kurdish policy in
the State Department.
The Kurdish Question, like the Armenian, is key to peace in the Middle
East. Palestine-Israel may be the hottest issue, but its resolution
will not usher in the hoped for peace in the area. If anything, with
that gone, the opportunities for mischief through the abuse of Kurds'
and Armenians' fundamental rights and manipulation by some powers of
their liberation movements, will expand.
It behooves us, as we develop and implement a media strategy, to
include the Kurdish perspective on our shared homeland.
By Garen Yegparian
http://www.asbarez.com/78059/la-times-k urdish-coverage/
Mar 8th, 2010
In this third of what started as a three part series on LATimes
coverage of interest to Armenians, I'll address some Kurdish-topic
patterns I noticed over the past two-plus years.
Arguably, the Kurds have fared best among the peoples of Armenia's
neighbors. Certainly, they had more coverage, at least in terms
of number of pieces, than anyone else, other than possibly Iran
(I have not tracked the latter). But, those pieces overwhelmingly
involved conflict. Whether it was Turkey attacking the PKK, the PKK
responding, the ramifications of these in Iraq and southern Kurdistan,
or the political growth pains of the federal structure in Iraq as it
impacts the Kurds- coverage stemmed from blood or fierce politics.
Even those stories not directly involving Iraq-Kurd and Turkey-PKK
issues were conflictual, e.g. Kurdish protests or persecution in
Turkey, Kurds denying responsibility for a bombing, and murders
attributed to a "tribal vendetta" in Kurd-inhabited parts of Turkey.
Plus, the one editorial regarding Turkish-PKK interactions favored
Turkey. There is no coverage of Turkey's abuses of Kurds' human
rights, no "picture" of daily life in Turkish occupied Armenia and
Kurdistan. There is the occasional piece about or reference to (in
coverage not specifically about the Kurds) "look at the progress in
northern Iraq". Basically, the paper seems to be toeing the State
Department's line. No one would call the LATimes pro-Kurdish.
These establishment-based and "if it bleeds it leads" biases do a
disservice to readers. For Armenians, it is, I suppose better than
nothing that some trickle of information about our "cousins" intrudes
upon our awareness to supplement what the Armenian media provides.
But this pathetic coverage of the largest stateless nation on the
planet leads to perpetual uninformedness of Kurdish reality among U.S.
citizens (as I have no doubt other major newspapers are similarly
deficient), in turn leading to less than optimal Kurdish policy in
the State Department.
The Kurdish Question, like the Armenian, is key to peace in the Middle
East. Palestine-Israel may be the hottest issue, but its resolution
will not usher in the hoped for peace in the area. If anything, with
that gone, the opportunities for mischief through the abuse of Kurds'
and Armenians' fundamental rights and manipulation by some powers of
their liberation movements, will expand.
It behooves us, as we develop and implement a media strategy, to
include the Kurdish perspective on our shared homeland.