Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why Did PACE Not Discuss Heritage's Timetable?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why Did PACE Not Discuss Heritage's Timetable?

    WHY DID PACE NOT DISCUSS HERITAGE'S TIMETABLE?

    Tert.am
    19:04 ~U 18.03.10

    A timetable on reforms to the electoral system presented to the
    Monitoring Committee of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of
    Europe (PACE) by Armenian opposition Heritage Party was not discussed
    during the March 17 PACE session, probably because of shortage of time,
    Heritage Party faction member Zaruhi Postanjyan told Tert.am.

    The National Assembly's Standing Committee on State and Legal Affairs
    timetables had been presented to PACE's Monitoring Committee also by
    the Armenian National Congress and the Heritage Party.

    Postanjyan said she was sure that the document had reached the
    Committee, adding that it was not yet clear how it might be discussed.

    "Any document presented by me has certainly been discussed in PACE,
    one way or another. I am sure that this document will not be left to
    inattention either," said she.

    According to Postanjyan, the fact that PACE co-rapporteurs Georges
    Colombier and John Prescott are expected to visit Armenia and hold
    hearings also with opposition representatives means that opposition's
    viewpoint has not been fully presented to the Committee.

    "Therefore, Colombier and Prescott want to get acquainted with our
    views on the spot, explained Postanjyan.
Working...
X