Tweet
British Government Should Recognize Armenian Genocide, Says Baroness Cox
By Asbarez Staff on Mar 25th, 2010
http://www.asbarez.com/78635/british-governme nt-should-recognize-armenian-genocide-says-barones s-cox/
LONDON-British Baroness, Caroline Cox, on Tuesday wrote an op-ed piece
for ePolitix.com calling on the British government to recognize the
Armenian Genocide. Her piece was submitted ahead of her asking an oral
question to the House of Lords about the Armenian Genocide. We present
her piece in its entirety below:
British Government Should Recognize Armenian Genocide
BY BARONESS CAROLINE COX
I am asking HMG whether it will reconsider its position on the
recognition of the Armenian Genocide sadly, without any hope of a
change in the British government's consistent policy of refusal to
acknowledge the truth.
However, the question is timely for three reasons:
1. The recent recognition by the Swedish Parliament of the
state-organized massacres of 1.5 million Armenians by Turkish
authorities, beginning in 1915, as genocide the latest in a long line
of Parliaments and other official bodies, such as the Vatican, to do
so.
2. The publication last October of `Was there an Armenian Genocide?
Geoffrey Robertson QC's opinion with reference to Foreign and
Commonwealth Office documents which show how British ministers,
Parliament and people have been misled'.
3. This year marks the 95th anniversary of the beginning of the
genocide and recognition is long overdue. Every genocide which remains
unrecognized is, in effect, condoned and can serve as an encouragement
to other potential perpetrators of subsequent genocides. This was most
infamously illustrated by Hitler's reference to the Armenian Genocide
before he embarked on the extension of the Holocaust in Poland:
`Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?'
Whenever initiatives are taken to encourage recognition of the
systematic slaughter and deportation of between one and two million
Armenians as genocide, the Turkish government becomes extremely active
in attempting to prevent this, through intimidating political pressure
and threats of economic boycott.
This response is tragic for at least three reasons:
1. Refusal to acknowledge the truth inevitably prevents any
possibility of healing for the Armenian people, and of genuine
reconciliation between Armenia and Turkey.
2. It would be healing for the Turkish people themselves for the truth
of their history to be acknowledged. When I was in Turkey, talking to
professional Turkish colleagues, many said they wished their
government would acknowledge the genocide. They knew the reality and
felt deeply unhappy at being forced to hide the truth and to live a
lie.
3. As already stated, refusal to recognise historical reality of any
genocide can serve as an encouragement to other potential
perpetrators, who will believe that they can get away with similar
genocides with impunity.
Geoffrey Robertson QC's concluding paragraph claims:
`HMG's real and only policy has been to evade truthful answers to
questions about the Armenian Genocide, because the truth would
discomfort the Turkish government. It can be predicted that any future
question on the subject will be met with the same meaningless formula
about `insufficiently unequivocal evidence', disguising the simple
fact that HMG will not now come to terms with an issue on which it was
once so volubly certain, namely that the Armenian massacres were a
`crime against humanity' which should never be forgiven or forgotten.
Times change, but as other civilised nations recognise, the universal
crimes of genocide and torture have no statute of limitations.'
This debate offers HMG an opportunity to join other civilised nations.
I greatly fear that it will fail to do so, and perpetuate Britain's
dishonour. But at least it will provide an opportunity for the truth
to be recorded once again in the British Parliament, for British
citizens to make up their own minds and, as the Welsh Assembly has
already done, to its great credit, to acknowledge and proclaim the
historic truth.
Swedish Parliament to re-run vote on Armenian Genocide Resolution
14:30 / 03/25/2010The Swedish Parliament will hold a second vote on
the Armenian Genocide resolution in 2011, Swedish Foreign Minister
Carl Bildt stated in his March 25 interview with Turkish NTV.
It is wrong to adopt political decisions on the events which took
place 100 years ago. What should be in question now is 2015, when
Turkey may become a full-fledged EU member, rather than 1915, Bildt
said.
He expressed a hope the resolution-complicated Turkish-Swedish
relations will shortly be normalized. Minister Bildt gave assurances
that that Sweden is a friendly state to Turkey, RIA Novosti reports.
On March 11 the Swedish Parliament approved an Armenian Genocide
resolution. A week before, the U.S. House of Representatives Committee
on Foreign Affairs approved a similar resolution. Turkey recalled its
Ambassadors to the U.S and Sweden in protest.
From: Baghdasarian
By Asbarez Staff on Mar 25th, 2010
http://www.asbarez.com/78635/british-governme nt-should-recognize-armenian-genocide-says-barones s-cox/
LONDON-British Baroness, Caroline Cox, on Tuesday wrote an op-ed piece
for ePolitix.com calling on the British government to recognize the
Armenian Genocide. Her piece was submitted ahead of her asking an oral
question to the House of Lords about the Armenian Genocide. We present
her piece in its entirety below:
British Government Should Recognize Armenian Genocide
BY BARONESS CAROLINE COX
I am asking HMG whether it will reconsider its position on the
recognition of the Armenian Genocide sadly, without any hope of a
change in the British government's consistent policy of refusal to
acknowledge the truth.
However, the question is timely for three reasons:
1. The recent recognition by the Swedish Parliament of the
state-organized massacres of 1.5 million Armenians by Turkish
authorities, beginning in 1915, as genocide the latest in a long line
of Parliaments and other official bodies, such as the Vatican, to do
so.
2. The publication last October of `Was there an Armenian Genocide?
Geoffrey Robertson QC's opinion with reference to Foreign and
Commonwealth Office documents which show how British ministers,
Parliament and people have been misled'.
3. This year marks the 95th anniversary of the beginning of the
genocide and recognition is long overdue. Every genocide which remains
unrecognized is, in effect, condoned and can serve as an encouragement
to other potential perpetrators of subsequent genocides. This was most
infamously illustrated by Hitler's reference to the Armenian Genocide
before he embarked on the extension of the Holocaust in Poland:
`Who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the Armenians?'
Whenever initiatives are taken to encourage recognition of the
systematic slaughter and deportation of between one and two million
Armenians as genocide, the Turkish government becomes extremely active
in attempting to prevent this, through intimidating political pressure
and threats of economic boycott.
This response is tragic for at least three reasons:
1. Refusal to acknowledge the truth inevitably prevents any
possibility of healing for the Armenian people, and of genuine
reconciliation between Armenia and Turkey.
2. It would be healing for the Turkish people themselves for the truth
of their history to be acknowledged. When I was in Turkey, talking to
professional Turkish colleagues, many said they wished their
government would acknowledge the genocide. They knew the reality and
felt deeply unhappy at being forced to hide the truth and to live a
lie.
3. As already stated, refusal to recognise historical reality of any
genocide can serve as an encouragement to other potential
perpetrators, who will believe that they can get away with similar
genocides with impunity.
Geoffrey Robertson QC's concluding paragraph claims:
`HMG's real and only policy has been to evade truthful answers to
questions about the Armenian Genocide, because the truth would
discomfort the Turkish government. It can be predicted that any future
question on the subject will be met with the same meaningless formula
about `insufficiently unequivocal evidence', disguising the simple
fact that HMG will not now come to terms with an issue on which it was
once so volubly certain, namely that the Armenian massacres were a
`crime against humanity' which should never be forgiven or forgotten.
Times change, but as other civilised nations recognise, the universal
crimes of genocide and torture have no statute of limitations.'
This debate offers HMG an opportunity to join other civilised nations.
I greatly fear that it will fail to do so, and perpetuate Britain's
dishonour. But at least it will provide an opportunity for the truth
to be recorded once again in the British Parliament, for British
citizens to make up their own minds and, as the Welsh Assembly has
already done, to its great credit, to acknowledge and proclaim the
historic truth.
Swedish Parliament to re-run vote on Armenian Genocide Resolution
14:30 / 03/25/2010The Swedish Parliament will hold a second vote on
the Armenian Genocide resolution in 2011, Swedish Foreign Minister
Carl Bildt stated in his March 25 interview with Turkish NTV.
It is wrong to adopt political decisions on the events which took
place 100 years ago. What should be in question now is 2015, when
Turkey may become a full-fledged EU member, rather than 1915, Bildt
said.
He expressed a hope the resolution-complicated Turkish-Swedish
relations will shortly be normalized. Minister Bildt gave assurances
that that Sweden is a friendly state to Turkey, RIA Novosti reports.
On March 11 the Swedish Parliament approved an Armenian Genocide
resolution. A week before, the U.S. House of Representatives Committee
on Foreign Affairs approved a similar resolution. Turkey recalled its
Ambassadors to the U.S and Sweden in protest.
From: Baghdasarian