Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Gas Cartel to Materialize

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Gas Cartel to Materialize

    Gas Cartel to Materialize

    en.fondsk.ruEnergy of the Future
    27.03.2010
    Igor TOMBERG

    Algeria, the country to host the Gas-Exporting Countries Forum on
    April 19, 2010, started sounding out the international reaction to the
    plan to convert the so-far consultative group into a gas analog of the
    OPEC oil cartel. Algerian Minister of Energy and Mines Chakib Khelil
    called for gas export cuts to put a floor under the declining natural
    gas prices.

    The media cited extensively Khelil's March 18 statement at the OPEC
    session in Vienna that the amount of natural gas on offer globally
    should be reduced to restore the balance between supply and demand. As
    the host of the coming forum, Algeria is in charge of the agenda
    which, based on the assessment of the current state of the gas market,
    it plans to center around the task of tightening the coordination
    between gas-exporting countries. The forum's permanent members are
    Iran, Bolivia, Algeria, Russia, Qatar, Egypt, Venezuela, Nigeria,
    Libya, Equatorial Guinea, and Trinidad and Tobago.

    There may, however, be quite different approaches to coordination.
    Judging by Khelil's statement, the forum is supposed to introduce gas
    export quotas to exert upward pressure on gas prices. This, however,
    is exactly the cartel practice meeting with resolute opposition from
    gas buyers.

    At the moment the gas market is in such condition that even Algeria,
    the country traditionally more cautious than others about hurting
    buyers' interests, is forced to push for export caps. Clearly, the
    measures would mainly affect LNG suppliers. The US breakthrough in the
    sphere of untraditional types of natural gas production, in the
    development of shale gas deposits in particular, combined with the
    global economic downturn and the LNG supply surge caused an oversupply
    of gas on the US market - one of the world's largest - and practically
    sealed it off for suppliers. LNG suppliers who eyed the US market and
    invested heavily in upgrading gas liquefaction and transit capacities
    were hit most by the situation. In Asia Pacific alone, the LNG
    capacities to come online in the short term total 34 bn cu m. As for
    Europe, the launch of Qatargas-2 and Ras Laffan-3 plants in the Middle
    East with the total output of about 40 bn cu m also left its market
    oversupplied. According to Wood Mackenzie estimates, the European gas
    market capacity in 2010-2012 (excluding long-term contracts ant
    take-or-pay schemes) will be somewhere at 70 bn cu m, while the supply
    will likely reach 140 bn cu m of pipeline gas and LNG.

    The International Energy Agency says at present the LNG supply exceeds
    demand by 30%. The LNG volumes that could not be fed to the US
    promptly found their way to the European and Asian spot markets,
    causing a price collapse - the spot market gas prices at the moment
    are a factor of 2.5 lower than at the peak of demand in 2008. The
    forecast by the Financial Times is that by the summer the spot prices
    will sink to $110 per thousand cu m - a record-low over eight years.
    In the meantime Russia, for example, is earning $230-250 per thousand
    cu m selling gas in accord with long-term contracts. Not surprisingly,
    buyers are minimizing the amounts of gas taken in their framework due
    to the availability of much cheaper gas and pushing suppliers to
    renegotiate the contract clauses like take-or-pay which guarantee
    sellers certain sale volumes.

    Russian Vedomosty daily quoted Russia's Deputy Energy Minister A.
    Yanovsky as saying that the Algerian export cuts proposal did not
    resonate with Moscow since Russia's gas export is based on long-term
    contracts. The statement could be the result of miscalculation - the
    tendency to minimize the amounts of gas consumed in accord with the
    take-or-pay scheme and to switch to the spot market can eventually
    compel sellers to agree to lower minimal contracted deliveries. The
    evolution would affect both pipeline gas sellers and LNG suppliers.
    Last year the latter already had to start offering their clients
    previously unthinkable perks like flexibility in delivery volumes or
    joint ownership of LNG projects. The pricing situation also leaves LNG
    suppliers with a lot to worry about - by October, 2009 the JCC (Japan
    Cleared Cargo) LNG price was 14% below the parity price based on
    comparing the gas and oil specific heat capacities.

    The pipeline gas business fares no better. Gazprom had to serially
    waive fines for taking less than the contracted amounts and, worse
    than that, found itself drawn into undesirable negotiations over
    easing the requirements set by the already existing contracts. The
    Russian energy giant is forced to sacrifice revenues and guarantees to
    maximally preserve sales volumes. The contraction of gas demand echoed
    with an over 50% reduction of the revenues generated by the Russian
    gas export to Europe.

    Evidently, conditions will continue to deteriorate, and the market
    will be increasingly dominated by buyers. The theme was discussed on
    March 22 in the Institute of World Economy and International Relations
    of the Russian Academy of Science during the presentation of a report
    jointly compiled by the World Energy Markets Research Center of the
    Energy Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Science and Wood
    Mackenzie. The study entitled The New Era For the Russian Gas Sector:
    In Search of Balance described the volatilities Russia's gas industry
    is likely to be confronted with till 2030. The unchecked accumulation
    of LNG facilities will be driving ever more intense competition
    between LNG and pipeline gas and between various suppliers over
    markets. The study contained no mentioning of orchestrated gas offer
    reduction, but the ideas and forecasts in it seem to reinforce the
    case for it. Chaotic proliferation of LNG facilities and injection of
    gas volumes that markets are unprepared to accommodate - with no
    underlying philosophy whatsoever - are the key causes of the current
    price collapses and future uncertainties.

    Chances to safeguard the interests of suppliers with the help of
    long-term contracts and take-or-pay arrangements of any kind are slim.
    Nor should anyone expect the schemes to be instrumental in keeping
    market shares or sustaining sales volumes. The entrenched egoism in
    the ranks of gas suppliers has already given serious advantages to
    buyers, and Khelil's call for coordination among gas-exporting
    countries is by all means timely. Hopefully, the call will be heard at
    the Gas-exporting Countries Forum in Algeria.

    There are indications that Moscow's position is drifting towards that
    of Algeria. Russian Prime Minister V. Putin said during the meeting
    with Prime Minister of Qatar Hamad bin Jassim Al Thani on March 23
    that as the world's two major energy suppliers Russia and Qatar should
    coordinate their activities on the gas market. The coordination on the
    European market between Russia, Algeria, and Qatar (the trio Iran,
    Venezuela, and Oman will definitely join) should open new horizons in
    stabilizing the European gas market, perhaps at the cost of a
    temporary reduction of gas offer.

    Experts in Europe are also becoming aware of the benefits of
    regulation and coordination on the gas market which is growing
    unacceptably volatile. Jonathan Stern, analyst at the Oxford Institute
    for Energy Studies, says: `I don't think we are at that stage [of a
    gas cartel] yet. But if prices fall further, we may find ourselves in
    a different situation by the middle of this year. Cartels work when
    producers are in dire straights.'


    Igor Tomberg is the Director of the Energy and Transportation Studies
    Center of the Institute for Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of
    Science and Professor of the Moscow Institute of International
    Relations of the Russian Foreign Ministry.
Working...
X