Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

TBILISI: Russian Plan To Resume Railway Service Between Russia And A

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TBILISI: Russian Plan To Resume Railway Service Between Russia And A

    RUSSIAN PLAN TO RESUME RAILWAY SERVICE BETWEEN RUSSIA AND ARMENIA
    Levan Kiknadze

    Expert Club
    http://eng.expertclub.ge/portal/cnid__4599/al ias__Expertclub/lang__en/tabid__2546/default.aspx
    May 17 2010
    Georgia

    President of the "Club of Experts"

    "We hope that in the coming three or five years it will be possible
    to resume railway service between Russia and Armenia through
    the territory of Georgia and which was suspended due to difficult
    Georgian-Abkhazian relations in the 90s" - said general director of
    "South Caucasian Railway" Shefket Shaidulin at the press-conference
    that was held in Yerevan on April 29th. According to him "of course,
    this is a political issue and depends of state of political affairs
    but there is a hope that this dream can come true".

    With this regard we would like to remind Mister Shaidulin that the
    railway that passes on the territory of Georgia became vital for
    Armenian population when relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan
    became extremely strained and they turned into armed confrontation.

    After the Georgian-Abkhazian conflict even this way was closed
    and Armenia found itself in a very difficult position. Naturally,
    Armenia that was in bad situation was very interested in quick
    regulation of the Georgian-Abkhazian conflict that would as well help
    to resume railway movement between Russia and Armenia through Georgian
    territory. Given that the issue of resumption of the railway movement
    was discussed in the Georgian-Armenian relations on almost every high
    level governmental meeting. At the same time Armenia used to work very
    actively for these purposes with government circles of both Russia
    and the west and international organizations. As a result, in the
    process of the regulation of the conflict from time to time an issue
    of restoration of the railway on the territory of Abkhazia was entering
    the agenda and was becoming more acute. But we must say to our Armenian
    neighbours that Russia would have never allowed this to happen. Though
    if Russia were to be willing resolution of this problem would not have
    been difficult since the conflict parties would not have been against
    it. But the reason for Russia's opposition was that by restoration
    of the railway in Abkhazia and resumption of railway service Russia
    would have been faced with unwanted reality as resumption of railway
    service would have opened way for the population on both sides of the
    division line for deepening of contacts, beginning of cooperation in
    various spheres, restoration of economical and cultural relations and
    so on. All this in the end would have been a significant success on
    the way to the resolution of the conflict and that would have stood
    in the way of fulfillment of Russia's insiidous plans.

    Then many believed in Russia's role as mediator. All the more that
    regarding the issue of restoration of the railway, as in many other
    issues, Russia at first always played a positive role. But as soon
    as it felt "danger" that the conflict parties were about to reach a
    consensus in a series of issues relevant reaction followed. Through
    security services they were able to easily provoke one or the
    other side as a result of which reached agreements were broken and
    negotiations were in the dead-end.

    The issue of restoration of the Abkhazian section of the railway
    and resumption of railway transit with Armenia was raised by Aslan
    Abashidze back during the Shevardnadze governance. At that time the
    Kremlin saw Aslan Abashidze as an alternative to Shevardnadze and as
    Ajara factor would not have been enough and in order to raise his
    rating among the refugee population of Abkhazia Moscow charged him
    with a role of a mediator for resolution of the Georgian-Abkhazian
    conflict. Additionally, what is no less important is that use of
    Abashidze would make it easier for Russia to direct the conflict
    resolution process considering its own interests. The issue of
    restoration of the railway in Abkhazia was also raised especially and
    Russia did not even intend to open transit movement. At that time
    information received by Security Ministry of Abkhazian legitimate
    government clearly showed that it was planned to restore only the
    Leselidze-Ochamchire section of the railway in Abkhazia in order to
    allow Russia to transport military goods and equipments deep into
    Abkhazia through the railway. And it was in no way connected with
    resumption of railway transit for Armenia. It was not connected for
    a simple reason that preparation works were not being carried out
    on those mechanisms that should have provided security of passenger
    and cargo transportations on the Georgian-Abkhazian section of the
    railway. As it is well- known Tamaz Nadareishvili not only blocked this
    issue but he also managed to debar Aslan Abashidze from the process.

    After the Rose Revolution as a result of active efforts of Armenia
    in both Moscow and the west negotiations regarding the issue of
    restoration of the railway in Abkhazia were put under control of
    the UN observer mission in Georgia. Bilateral working groups were
    established and they were working in various directions and were filled
    with railway, power and security specialists. Restoration works were
    defined and financing of the restoration works was undertaken by the
    Russian railway which was officially registered in a protocol.

    Russian railway troops entered Abkhazia to conduct restoration
    works and actively started to restore the railway. By this time
    Russia, as usual, drove negotiations into the dead-end and isolate
    the Georgian side from the process of the railway restoration and
    finished restoration of the Leselidze-Ochamchire section of the
    railway. And nobody was bothering the Georgian side about restoration
    of the remaining part of the railway - the Ochamchire-Ingiri section
    - that was in the worst condition and without restoration of which
    transit with Armenia would not have been possible. As following events
    showed that the restoration of the Leselidze-Ochamchire section of the
    railway was an important part of Russia's plan of ultimate occupation
    of Abkhazia.

    As to Sheftek Shaidulin's recent statement about resumption of the
    railway service between Russia and Armenia through Georgian territory
    the latter of course means restoration of the Ochamchire-Gali section
    of the railway what Russia can do perfectly well without us. But
    as to the Enguri railway bridge that connects Gali and Zugdidi its
    restoration can only be possible with our consent. We do not rule out
    that Sheftek Shaidulin's recent statement could be a trick as Russia
    is convinced that in case of actualization of this issue in existing
    circumstances Georgia will refuse and thus Russia will try to stir
    up discord between us and Armenia as it has done many times before.

    FYI: The Armenian railway was handed over for 30 years to the South
    Caucasian Railway which is a sister company to the Russian railway.

    The agreement provides that if the service on the Abkhazian section
    of the railway is restored investment must amount to 2.1 billion
    US dollars.
Working...
X