Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Updated Madrid principles: Baku claims to have accepted document

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Updated Madrid principles: Baku claims to have accepted document

    Updated Madrid principles: Baku claims to have accepted document,
    expects Yerevan to follow suit

    Analysis | 21.05.10 | 13:28


    Photolure


    Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan

    By Aris Ghazinyan
    ArmeniaNow reporter

    Official Baku declares it accepts the updated Madrid principles for
    the settlement of the Karabakh problem.


    Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov, speaking about the
    details of the updated version of the principles, noted that `the
    updated version presented in Athens creates opportunities for further
    steps on a significant agreement.'

    Under the document that international mediators propose as a basis for
    a future peace deal on the first stage Armenian defense forces are to
    withdraw from the districts surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh, except the
    Kelbajar and Lachin districts that immediately border on Armenia. (It
    is stipulated that the Armenian forces should first leave not the
    entire Lachin district, but its 13 villages.)

    After that, according to the Azerbaijani diplomat, `all borders and
    communications will be opened, programs will be launched, the issue of
    international observers will be solved considering the importance of
    the security of returning internally displaced persons to the places
    of their former residence.'

    The next stage: the return of the Azerbaijani community to Karabakh
    and creation of conditions for the start of the process on determining
    the status of Nagorno-Karabakh.

    The Azerbaijani diplomat said that `in the world there are different
    types of autonomies and statuses ... For example, Tatars, Bashkir also
    realized their self-determination, but within the boundaries of the
    Russian Federation.'

    Baku-based political analyst Rauf Mirkadyrov, analyzing the statement
    of Mammadyarov, says that `everything is clear about things that
    concern the phased withdrawal from occupied territories and
    restoration of communications.' But then, he says, there are no
    specifics in the minister's statements.'

    The analyst says that Mammadyarov, speaking about the determination of
    the status of Nagorno-Karabakh after the return of internally
    displaced persons, outlines the position of Azerbaijan in the
    implementation of the principle of self-determination, which is based
    on giving broad autonomy to Nagorno-Karabakh, while Azerbaijan's
    territorial integrity is maintained. However, the analyst doubts that
    the updated Madrid principles clearly state the definition of the
    final legal status of Nagorno-Karabakh within Azerbaijan's territorial
    integrity.

    `Most likely, the document refers to the settlement of the conflict
    with the consideration of the principles of territorial integrity and
    the right of peoples to self-determination. If it weren't so, the
    foreign minister would have cited the phrase verbatim,' says
    Mirkadyrov.

    The issue of the updated Madrid principles was discussed at the
    meeting on May 17 in Baku between Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev
    and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

    Erdogan said that `Azerbaijan has always shown a constructive approach
    to resolving the conflict. In particular, the fact that Azerbaijan has
    had a positive attitude towards the latest proposal of the co-chairs
    of the [OSCE] Minsk Group and Armenia has not yet expressed its
    attitude to this issue, demonstrates Azerbaijan's constructive
    approach in this matter.'

    President Ilham Aliyev also addressed this issue. He said: `As regards
    the proposal made on the basis of the updated Madrid principles, the
    Azerbaijani side, in principle, with very few exceptions, has accepted
    the proposal. We expect a similar approach from the Armenian side.
    Despite the fact that about six months have passed since the formal
    submission of the proposal, no positive response has yet been received
    from the Armenian side. Either it [the Armenian side] answers in the
    affirmative and we move closer to resolving the issue, or else it
    gives a negative answer and thus the negotiation process will be
    disrupted and a new period may begin between Armenia and Azerbaijan.'

    He did not say whether this new period will be a period of military
    tension or not.

    Armenian political analyst Samvel Martirosyan believes that an updated
    version of the Madrid principles is not very different from the basic
    ones.

    In his opinion, Azerbaijan is now trying to show it accepts the
    principles of settlement, while as a matter of fact it sets a
    precondition: only on the basis of preserving the territorial
    integrity of the [Azerbaijani] republic within its Soviet borders.

    Martirosyan says that in this case `Armenia in equally measure accepts
    the Madrid principles, but with its own precondition -
    Nagorno-Karabakh in no case can be part of Azerbaijan.'

    President Serzh Sargsyan's speech at the Chatham House British Royal
    Institute of International Affairs on February 10, 2010 is considered
    to be Yerevan's official reaction to the updated Madrid principles.

    Later, in March, in an interview with EuroNews, a leading pan-European
    television news channel, the Armenian president noted:
    `Nagorno-Karabakh was not a part of independent Azerbaijan. It was the
    Caucasus Bureau of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union which
    attached Nagorno-Karabakh to Azerbaijan. Why did the international
    community acclaim the collapse of the Soviet Union and not consider
    Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan part and
    parcel of the Soviet Union? And in the case with Karabakh the
    international community is still saying it is an integral part of
    Azerbaidjan? It is not logical, is it?'

    The Armenian side has not made any new statements after those
    statements. Though, as political analysts think, the best statement
    would be a normal conduct of parliamentary elections in
    Nagorno-Karabakh slated for May 23.
Working...
X