TURKEY VS. CHRISTIAN ACTION NETWORK
Posted by Ryan Mauro
Nov 9th, 2010
http://frontpagemag.com/2010/11/09/turkey-vs-christian-action-network/
Ryan Mauro is the founder of WorldThreats.com, National Security
Advisor to the Christian Action Network, and an intelligence analyst
with the Asymmetric Warfare and Intelligence Center.
The Christian Action Network (CAN), where I serve as the National
Security Adviser, is being condemned by Turkey's ambassador to the
U.S. for using the Turkish flag on the cover of the organization's new
documentary, Sacrificed Survivors: The Untold Story of the Ground Zero
Mosque. Ambassador Namik Tan is accusing the CAN of slandering the
Turkish people by using the flag and criticizing their government's
Islamist agenda. This accusation of bigotry is an attempt to distract
from Turkey's move away from secularism to the side of Iran, Syria,
Hamas, and Sudan.
The controversy erupted when the Turkish media criticized the use
of the flag on the cover of the film. CAN says they wanted to use a
flag with Islamic symbols to emphasize the connection between radical
Islam's goal of promoting Sharia-based governance and the Ground Zero
mosque. The Turkish flag was chosen because as the CIA World Factbook
explains, "the crescent moon and star serve as insignia for the Turks,
as well as being traditional symbols of Islam."
The organization said it regretted any hurt feelings caused by the
decision and it did not mean to single out Turkey. CAN sought to
rectify the situation by adding the flags of Saudi Arabia, Pakistan,
Iran, and Sudan to the cover to identify some places where radical
Islam has taken hold and is being promoted from. Turkey's flag
remained to serve as an example of how a secular, Western ally like
Turkey can fall to the influence of Islamism as it has under Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his Justice and Development Party.
Ambassador Namik Tan wrote a letter on November 4 to Martin Mawyer,
President of CAN, berating him for "unacceptable and unfair accusations
about Turkey, the Turkish government and the Turkish people in your
website." He wrote, "You inaccurately and insultingly accuse the
Turkish people and the government of supporting 'radical Islam.'" He
acknowledges that the group denies branding the Turkish people as a
whole, but says CAN is doing this in "reckless fashion."
However, CAN's criticism of the Erdogan government made a specific
point of explaining that the majority of Turks are not sympathetic to
terrorist groups or radical Islam. Polls show that only four percent
support suicide bombings, two percent have confidence in Osama Bin
Laden to do the right thing, three percent have a favorable view
of Hezbollah, and five percent have a favorable view of Hamas. The
backlash among the Turkish people against Erdogan's Islamist agenda
was also mentioned.
The warnings about Turkey's government are well-founded. Prime Minister
Erdogan was once a member of the Welfare Party, which Soner Cagaptay
of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy describes as the
"motherboard of Turkish Islamists." When his Justice and Development
Party won in 2002, the Muslim Brotherhood praised them for the
"exposing of the failure of the secular trend." Under Erdogan's
leadership, Turkey has taken a confrontational stance towards Israel.
It has held joint military exercises with Syria, and the President
and Prime Minister have personally met with Moqtada al-Sadr, the
Iranian-backed Iraqi militia leader that waged war on Coalition
and Iraqi forces. Prime Minister Erdogan opposed the International
Criminal Court's indictment of Sudanese President Omar Bashir because
"no Muslim could perpetrate a genocide."
ObamaYoMoma 80p · 9 hours ago CAN says they wanted to use a flag with
Islamic symbols to emphasize the connection between radical Islam's
goal of promoting Sharia-based governance and the Ground Zero mosque.
So according to Ryan Mauro, only radical Islam's goal as opposed to
mainstream Islam's goal is to promote Sharia-based governance and
the Ground Zero mosque, even though the jihad ideology, the Islamic
imperative to subjugate the world via the imposition of Sharia,
couldn't be more mainstream within Islam as it is taught and advocated
by all sects within Islam and by all schools of Islamic jurisprudence
in both Shi'a and Sunni Islam. Hence, Ryan Mauro and Barack Obama
are in lock step and see eye to eye where Islam is concerned, as they
both believe in the political correct myth that Islam is a Religion
of Peace~Y being hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists who are
trying to warp and twist one of the world's great religions. I,
on the other hand, along with many other people as well understand
that mainstream Islam is a theo-political totalitarian ideology that
seeks to subjugate the world via the imposition of Sharia as its main
goal and only poses as being a religion to infiltrate the countries
it intends to subjugate and subsume. Reply
PhillipGaley · 4 hours ago And, . . . a principal reason for this
lock-step, the world round, between those mentioned and those groups
who use Islamist related insignia such as the crescent moon and
star, or the fez, as do The Ancient Arabic Order of the Nobles of
the Mystic Shrine, commonly called, the Shriners-and having at least
something to do with why some of the basic impulses of Islam finds
support in non-Moslem societies-such as Nazi Germany-has to do with
concentrations of power, as attractive to individuals for sense of
providence in daily necessities.
But the one of commonality in totalitarian or primitive society
which here, I wish to point to, has to do with-so coarsely as it doth
appear-the way men get women-which, more or less as a group effort, is
the way in which those of that persuasion-Moslem or other totalitarian
sort look at the thing-it's a project.
Because, the backward and controlling bureaucratic part of their
societies don't understand women-but generally, also, even in advanced
societies men don't understand women all that well-at the very least,
not so well as women understand men-and in many places in media,
providing thus some comic confusion-and thought allowable partly,
under various forms of naive predication which suppose such as:
"Well, [than I] nobody else, understands them any better; so, . . .";
neither by aptitude, nor apprehending nor, but little caring for the
attention to detail and the regard which, to successful courtship is
requisite, in such a state, the men those groups derive and implement
other forceful means: And, I do so wish that, I could remember where,
reading of the Islamist advertisement which sought virgins to satisfy
a group of warriors-only, as their duty to the war effort. And yeah,
why spend all that darned time dominating a woman intellectually and
emotionally, when a faster means makes sense? Except, bureaucratic
types are not at all, the archetype of champion to be honored in the
female psyche; so, . . .
However, when once they have the women, as is often reported of police
brutality in their own homes, here as easily as there, those women
are thus put to suffer violence from a crude man; so, . . . Reply
tanstaafl 97p · 9 hours ago Turkey has a problem with the truth. To
this day, the Turkish government denies the Armenian genocide and
role of Turks in this modern day jihad. Reply
USMCSniper · 6 hours ago The core principles of Islam have the goal
of converting, killing, or subjugating all non-Muslims. Non-Muslims
are going to have to decide to fight for their cultures, freedoms,
and values or they are going to lose them. Islam the enemy of all
free societies. Reply
rtk_51 50p · 5 hours ago Turkey and the lack of staying power of
a secular government proves that Islam can't change, and that the
people who keep talking about moderate Moslems are living in a fantasy
world. Reply
Chezwick_Mac 82p · 5 hours ago We can anticipate Turkey's evolution
from secularism to Islam, from ally to enemy, to become the model
for Europe as a whole. The only difference is the timetable. Reply
Pamela · 3 hours ago Turkey committed genocide against all of its
indigenous Christians - Assyrians, Hellenes, and Armenians - and
stole their land, property, and churches.
Now Turkey complains that it is being kept out of the European Union
because the latter is a Christian club. Is this gall and chutzpah
or what?
Now, Turkey is going after the Jews and Israel! Turks apparently like
committing holocausts against people who are dissimilar to them. Even
Alevis and Muslim Kurds are not spared.
Turkey: "birthplace of holocausts."
From: A. Papazian
Posted by Ryan Mauro
Nov 9th, 2010
http://frontpagemag.com/2010/11/09/turkey-vs-christian-action-network/
Ryan Mauro is the founder of WorldThreats.com, National Security
Advisor to the Christian Action Network, and an intelligence analyst
with the Asymmetric Warfare and Intelligence Center.
The Christian Action Network (CAN), where I serve as the National
Security Adviser, is being condemned by Turkey's ambassador to the
U.S. for using the Turkish flag on the cover of the organization's new
documentary, Sacrificed Survivors: The Untold Story of the Ground Zero
Mosque. Ambassador Namik Tan is accusing the CAN of slandering the
Turkish people by using the flag and criticizing their government's
Islamist agenda. This accusation of bigotry is an attempt to distract
from Turkey's move away from secularism to the side of Iran, Syria,
Hamas, and Sudan.
The controversy erupted when the Turkish media criticized the use
of the flag on the cover of the film. CAN says they wanted to use a
flag with Islamic symbols to emphasize the connection between radical
Islam's goal of promoting Sharia-based governance and the Ground Zero
mosque. The Turkish flag was chosen because as the CIA World Factbook
explains, "the crescent moon and star serve as insignia for the Turks,
as well as being traditional symbols of Islam."
The organization said it regretted any hurt feelings caused by the
decision and it did not mean to single out Turkey. CAN sought to
rectify the situation by adding the flags of Saudi Arabia, Pakistan,
Iran, and Sudan to the cover to identify some places where radical
Islam has taken hold and is being promoted from. Turkey's flag
remained to serve as an example of how a secular, Western ally like
Turkey can fall to the influence of Islamism as it has under Prime
Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his Justice and Development Party.
Ambassador Namik Tan wrote a letter on November 4 to Martin Mawyer,
President of CAN, berating him for "unacceptable and unfair accusations
about Turkey, the Turkish government and the Turkish people in your
website." He wrote, "You inaccurately and insultingly accuse the
Turkish people and the government of supporting 'radical Islam.'" He
acknowledges that the group denies branding the Turkish people as a
whole, but says CAN is doing this in "reckless fashion."
However, CAN's criticism of the Erdogan government made a specific
point of explaining that the majority of Turks are not sympathetic to
terrorist groups or radical Islam. Polls show that only four percent
support suicide bombings, two percent have confidence in Osama Bin
Laden to do the right thing, three percent have a favorable view
of Hezbollah, and five percent have a favorable view of Hamas. The
backlash among the Turkish people against Erdogan's Islamist agenda
was also mentioned.
The warnings about Turkey's government are well-founded. Prime Minister
Erdogan was once a member of the Welfare Party, which Soner Cagaptay
of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy describes as the
"motherboard of Turkish Islamists." When his Justice and Development
Party won in 2002, the Muslim Brotherhood praised them for the
"exposing of the failure of the secular trend." Under Erdogan's
leadership, Turkey has taken a confrontational stance towards Israel.
It has held joint military exercises with Syria, and the President
and Prime Minister have personally met with Moqtada al-Sadr, the
Iranian-backed Iraqi militia leader that waged war on Coalition
and Iraqi forces. Prime Minister Erdogan opposed the International
Criminal Court's indictment of Sudanese President Omar Bashir because
"no Muslim could perpetrate a genocide."
ObamaYoMoma 80p · 9 hours ago CAN says they wanted to use a flag with
Islamic symbols to emphasize the connection between radical Islam's
goal of promoting Sharia-based governance and the Ground Zero mosque.
So according to Ryan Mauro, only radical Islam's goal as opposed to
mainstream Islam's goal is to promote Sharia-based governance and
the Ground Zero mosque, even though the jihad ideology, the Islamic
imperative to subjugate the world via the imposition of Sharia,
couldn't be more mainstream within Islam as it is taught and advocated
by all sects within Islam and by all schools of Islamic jurisprudence
in both Shi'a and Sunni Islam. Hence, Ryan Mauro and Barack Obama
are in lock step and see eye to eye where Islam is concerned, as they
both believe in the political correct myth that Islam is a Religion
of Peace~Y being hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists who are
trying to warp and twist one of the world's great religions. I,
on the other hand, along with many other people as well understand
that mainstream Islam is a theo-political totalitarian ideology that
seeks to subjugate the world via the imposition of Sharia as its main
goal and only poses as being a religion to infiltrate the countries
it intends to subjugate and subsume. Reply
PhillipGaley · 4 hours ago And, . . . a principal reason for this
lock-step, the world round, between those mentioned and those groups
who use Islamist related insignia such as the crescent moon and
star, or the fez, as do The Ancient Arabic Order of the Nobles of
the Mystic Shrine, commonly called, the Shriners-and having at least
something to do with why some of the basic impulses of Islam finds
support in non-Moslem societies-such as Nazi Germany-has to do with
concentrations of power, as attractive to individuals for sense of
providence in daily necessities.
But the one of commonality in totalitarian or primitive society
which here, I wish to point to, has to do with-so coarsely as it doth
appear-the way men get women-which, more or less as a group effort, is
the way in which those of that persuasion-Moslem or other totalitarian
sort look at the thing-it's a project.
Because, the backward and controlling bureaucratic part of their
societies don't understand women-but generally, also, even in advanced
societies men don't understand women all that well-at the very least,
not so well as women understand men-and in many places in media,
providing thus some comic confusion-and thought allowable partly,
under various forms of naive predication which suppose such as:
"Well, [than I] nobody else, understands them any better; so, . . .";
neither by aptitude, nor apprehending nor, but little caring for the
attention to detail and the regard which, to successful courtship is
requisite, in such a state, the men those groups derive and implement
other forceful means: And, I do so wish that, I could remember where,
reading of the Islamist advertisement which sought virgins to satisfy
a group of warriors-only, as their duty to the war effort. And yeah,
why spend all that darned time dominating a woman intellectually and
emotionally, when a faster means makes sense? Except, bureaucratic
types are not at all, the archetype of champion to be honored in the
female psyche; so, . . .
However, when once they have the women, as is often reported of police
brutality in their own homes, here as easily as there, those women
are thus put to suffer violence from a crude man; so, . . . Reply
tanstaafl 97p · 9 hours ago Turkey has a problem with the truth. To
this day, the Turkish government denies the Armenian genocide and
role of Turks in this modern day jihad. Reply
USMCSniper · 6 hours ago The core principles of Islam have the goal
of converting, killing, or subjugating all non-Muslims. Non-Muslims
are going to have to decide to fight for their cultures, freedoms,
and values or they are going to lose them. Islam the enemy of all
free societies. Reply
rtk_51 50p · 5 hours ago Turkey and the lack of staying power of
a secular government proves that Islam can't change, and that the
people who keep talking about moderate Moslems are living in a fantasy
world. Reply
Chezwick_Mac 82p · 5 hours ago We can anticipate Turkey's evolution
from secularism to Islam, from ally to enemy, to become the model
for Europe as a whole. The only difference is the timetable. Reply
Pamela · 3 hours ago Turkey committed genocide against all of its
indigenous Christians - Assyrians, Hellenes, and Armenians - and
stole their land, property, and churches.
Now Turkey complains that it is being kept out of the European Union
because the latter is a Christian club. Is this gall and chutzpah
or what?
Now, Turkey is going after the Jews and Israel! Turks apparently like
committing holocausts against people who are dissimilar to them. Even
Alevis and Muslim Kurds are not spared.
Turkey: "birthplace of holocausts."
From: A. Papazian