Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Turkey Vs. Christian Action Network

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Turkey Vs. Christian Action Network

    TURKEY VS. CHRISTIAN ACTION NETWORK
    Posted by Ryan Mauro

    Nov 9th, 2010
    http://frontpagemag.com/2010/11/09/turkey-vs-christian-action-network/

    Ryan Mauro is the founder of WorldThreats.com, National Security
    Advisor to the Christian Action Network, and an intelligence analyst
    with the Asymmetric Warfare and Intelligence Center.

    The Christian Action Network (CAN), where I serve as the National
    Security Adviser, is being condemned by Turkey's ambassador to the
    U.S. for using the Turkish flag on the cover of the organization's new
    documentary, Sacrificed Survivors: The Untold Story of the Ground Zero
    Mosque. Ambassador Namik Tan is accusing the CAN of slandering the
    Turkish people by using the flag and criticizing their government's
    Islamist agenda. This accusation of bigotry is an attempt to distract
    from Turkey's move away from secularism to the side of Iran, Syria,
    Hamas, and Sudan.

    The controversy erupted when the Turkish media criticized the use
    of the flag on the cover of the film. CAN says they wanted to use a
    flag with Islamic symbols to emphasize the connection between radical
    Islam's goal of promoting Sharia-based governance and the Ground Zero
    mosque. The Turkish flag was chosen because as the CIA World Factbook
    explains, "the crescent moon and star serve as insignia for the Turks,
    as well as being traditional symbols of Islam."

    The organization said it regretted any hurt feelings caused by the
    decision and it did not mean to single out Turkey. CAN sought to
    rectify the situation by adding the flags of Saudi Arabia, Pakistan,
    Iran, and Sudan to the cover to identify some places where radical
    Islam has taken hold and is being promoted from. Turkey's flag
    remained to serve as an example of how a secular, Western ally like
    Turkey can fall to the influence of Islamism as it has under Prime
    Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his Justice and Development Party.

    Ambassador Namik Tan wrote a letter on November 4 to Martin Mawyer,
    President of CAN, berating him for "unacceptable and unfair accusations
    about Turkey, the Turkish government and the Turkish people in your
    website." He wrote, "You inaccurately and insultingly accuse the
    Turkish people and the government of supporting 'radical Islam.'" He
    acknowledges that the group denies branding the Turkish people as a
    whole, but says CAN is doing this in "reckless fashion."

    However, CAN's criticism of the Erdogan government made a specific
    point of explaining that the majority of Turks are not sympathetic to
    terrorist groups or radical Islam. Polls show that only four percent
    support suicide bombings, two percent have confidence in Osama Bin
    Laden to do the right thing, three percent have a favorable view
    of Hezbollah, and five percent have a favorable view of Hamas. The
    backlash among the Turkish people against Erdogan's Islamist agenda
    was also mentioned.

    The warnings about Turkey's government are well-founded. Prime Minister
    Erdogan was once a member of the Welfare Party, which Soner Cagaptay
    of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy describes as the
    "motherboard of Turkish Islamists." When his Justice and Development
    Party won in 2002, the Muslim Brotherhood praised them for the
    "exposing of the failure of the secular trend." Under Erdogan's
    leadership, Turkey has taken a confrontational stance towards Israel.

    It has held joint military exercises with Syria, and the President
    and Prime Minister have personally met with Moqtada al-Sadr, the
    Iranian-backed Iraqi militia leader that waged war on Coalition
    and Iraqi forces. Prime Minister Erdogan opposed the International
    Criminal Court's indictment of Sudanese President Omar Bashir because
    "no Muslim could perpetrate a genocide."

    ObamaYoMoma 80p · 9 hours ago CAN says they wanted to use a flag with
    Islamic symbols to emphasize the connection between radical Islam's
    goal of promoting Sharia-based governance and the Ground Zero mosque.

    So according to Ryan Mauro, only radical Islam's goal as opposed to
    mainstream Islam's goal is to promote Sharia-based governance and
    the Ground Zero mosque, even though the jihad ideology, the Islamic
    imperative to subjugate the world via the imposition of Sharia,
    couldn't be more mainstream within Islam as it is taught and advocated
    by all sects within Islam and by all schools of Islamic jurisprudence
    in both Shi'a and Sunni Islam. Hence, Ryan Mauro and Barack Obama
    are in lock step and see eye to eye where Islam is concerned, as they
    both believe in the political correct myth that Islam is a Religion
    of Peace~Y being hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists who are
    trying to warp and twist one of the world's great religions. I,
    on the other hand, along with many other people as well understand
    that mainstream Islam is a theo-political totalitarian ideology that
    seeks to subjugate the world via the imposition of Sharia as its main
    goal and only poses as being a religion to infiltrate the countries
    it intends to subjugate and subsume. Reply

    PhillipGaley · 4 hours ago And, . . . a principal reason for this
    lock-step, the world round, between those mentioned and those groups
    who use Islamist related insignia such as the crescent moon and
    star, or the fez, as do The Ancient Arabic Order of the Nobles of
    the Mystic Shrine, commonly called, the Shriners-and having at least
    something to do with why some of the basic impulses of Islam finds
    support in non-Moslem societies-such as Nazi Germany-has to do with
    concentrations of power, as attractive to individuals for sense of
    providence in daily necessities.

    But the one of commonality in totalitarian or primitive society
    which here, I wish to point to, has to do with-so coarsely as it doth
    appear-the way men get women-which, more or less as a group effort, is
    the way in which those of that persuasion-Moslem or other totalitarian
    sort look at the thing-it's a project.

    Because, the backward and controlling bureaucratic part of their
    societies don't understand women-but generally, also, even in advanced
    societies men don't understand women all that well-at the very least,
    not so well as women understand men-and in many places in media,
    providing thus some comic confusion-and thought allowable partly,
    under various forms of naive predication which suppose such as:
    "Well, [than I] nobody else, understands them any better; so, . . .";
    neither by aptitude, nor apprehending nor, but little caring for the
    attention to detail and the regard which, to successful courtship is
    requisite, in such a state, the men those groups derive and implement
    other forceful means: And, I do so wish that, I could remember where,
    reading of the Islamist advertisement which sought virgins to satisfy
    a group of warriors-only, as their duty to the war effort. And yeah,
    why spend all that darned time dominating a woman intellectually and
    emotionally, when a faster means makes sense? Except, bureaucratic
    types are not at all, the archetype of champion to be honored in the
    female psyche; so, . . .

    However, when once they have the women, as is often reported of police
    brutality in their own homes, here as easily as there, those women
    are thus put to suffer violence from a crude man; so, . . . Reply

    tanstaafl 97p · 9 hours ago Turkey has a problem with the truth. To
    this day, the Turkish government denies the Armenian genocide and
    role of Turks in this modern day jihad. Reply

    USMCSniper · 6 hours ago The core principles of Islam have the goal
    of converting, killing, or subjugating all non-Muslims. Non-Muslims
    are going to have to decide to fight for their cultures, freedoms,
    and values or they are going to lose them. Islam the enemy of all
    free societies. Reply

    rtk_51 50p · 5 hours ago Turkey and the lack of staying power of
    a secular government proves that Islam can't change, and that the
    people who keep talking about moderate Moslems are living in a fantasy
    world. Reply

    Chezwick_Mac 82p · 5 hours ago We can anticipate Turkey's evolution
    from secularism to Islam, from ally to enemy, to become the model
    for Europe as a whole. The only difference is the timetable. Reply

    Pamela · 3 hours ago Turkey committed genocide against all of its
    indigenous Christians - Assyrians, Hellenes, and Armenians - and
    stole their land, property, and churches.

    Now Turkey complains that it is being kept out of the European Union
    because the latter is a Christian club. Is this gall and chutzpah
    or what?

    Now, Turkey is going after the Jews and Israel! Turks apparently like
    committing holocausts against people who are dissimilar to them. Even
    Alevis and Muslim Kurds are not spared.

    Turkey: "birthplace of holocausts."




    From: A. Papazian
Working...
X