Tweet
TIME TO TAKE A STAND: WHO TO VOTE FOR AND WHO TO VOTE AGAINST?
By Harut Sassounian Publisher, The California Courier
Noyan Tapan
26.10.2010 | 13:24
The November 2 congressional elections are expected to have a tidal
wave effect on America's political landscape. Campaign ads and
political commentaries have flooded the airwaves and everyone is
anxiously following the polls to see if their favorite candidate or
party is going to prevail or get tossed out.
In two short years, Pres. Obama's popularity has plummeted
precipitously. Disappointed by his administration's disastrous
performance, the American public has turned on Democratic incumbents,
many of whom fear losing their congressional seats.
Even though several key races are too close to call, political pundits
expect that Republicans will take over the House of Representatives,
and possibly the Senate. If these predictions come true, there will
probably be total gridlock in Washington until the next presidential
and congressional elections in 2012. Until then, all new initiatives
undertaken by the Obama administration will be stalled in Congress,
making it almost impossible to pass any bills on important national
issues.
In such a confusing situation, how would Armenian-American vote? Those
who are staunch Democrats or Republicans have an easy choice to make.
They would vote for their party's candidates, regardless of their
position on issues.
However, those who care about Armenian issues have a somewhat more
difficult task. They could take the position that since Democrats have
not delivered their promises on the Genocide resolution, they would
punish them by voting instead for Republican candidates. The problem
is that traditionally most Republican members of Congress have been
less supportive of the Armenian Genocide issue than Democrats. Thus,
voting for all Republican candidates, while perhaps emotionally
satisfying, will not benefit the Armenian Cause. On the contrary,
Armenians would be helping to elect candidates who are less sympathetic
than the current members of Congress, many of whom are Democrats.
Another option is to sit out the elections completely, since neither
Democrats nor Republicans delivered on Armenian issues when they were
in power. This is not a good option, however, as it would squander
decades of political investment the Armenian community has made in
American civic life.
The option I recommend for the consideration of Armenian-American
voters is none of the above. Do not vote blindly for your party's
candidates, and do not sit out the election.
The optimum choice is to vote for candidates of any party who have
demonstrated a proven track record of active support on Armenian
issues. Those who are reluctant to vote on the basis of a candidate's
stand on Armenian issues should remember that most voters make their
selection based on their perceived self-interest. Jews, Blacks,
Hispanics, Turks and other ethnic groups vote for candidates who
support their causes. Those in high-income brackets typically vote
for candidates who promise to lower their taxes, while poor people
usually support those who favor funding more social services. Why
should Armenians be the exception and shy away from supporting
candidates who favor their issues? Voters make their electoral choices
on the basis of their interests. It is then up to elected officials
to balance the conflicting interests of their constituents.
Armenian-Americans can keep their friends in Congress by re-electing
the 120 Democratic and 36 Republican House members; and 12 Democratic,
2 Republican, and 1 independent Senators all of whom received top
grades from the Armenian National Committee of America. At the same
time, Armenian-Americans can reduce the number of their opponents
in Congress by supporting candidates who are running against the
18 Democratic and 22 Republican House members who received a failing
grade from ANCA. To check the individual record of Members of Congress,
please consult the ANCA's report card by clicking on: www.anca.org.
Finally, everyone must be aware that the day after the Nov. 2 elections
is the unofficial start of the next presidential campaign. In this
regard, it is distressing that Pres. Obama came to Los Angeles
and Glendale last Friday and not a single Armenian protested his
appearance. How could Armenians ignore the fact that the President did
not keep his promise to acknowledge the Armenian Genocide during his
first two years in office? As Pres. Obama was desperately seeking to
convince voters to support Democratic candidates, Southern California's
large Armenian community missed a unique opportunity to show the
President its displeasure before the national media.
By their absence, Armenians sent an ominous message to all candidates:
You can promise anything to Armenians to get their money and votes,
and after the election, you can break your promise with impunity!
Armenians need to wake up from their lethargy. If they want elected
officials to take them seriously, they must reward their political
friends and penalize their opponents!
From: A. Papazian
By Harut Sassounian Publisher, The California Courier
Noyan Tapan
26.10.2010 | 13:24
The November 2 congressional elections are expected to have a tidal
wave effect on America's political landscape. Campaign ads and
political commentaries have flooded the airwaves and everyone is
anxiously following the polls to see if their favorite candidate or
party is going to prevail or get tossed out.
In two short years, Pres. Obama's popularity has plummeted
precipitously. Disappointed by his administration's disastrous
performance, the American public has turned on Democratic incumbents,
many of whom fear losing their congressional seats.
Even though several key races are too close to call, political pundits
expect that Republicans will take over the House of Representatives,
and possibly the Senate. If these predictions come true, there will
probably be total gridlock in Washington until the next presidential
and congressional elections in 2012. Until then, all new initiatives
undertaken by the Obama administration will be stalled in Congress,
making it almost impossible to pass any bills on important national
issues.
In such a confusing situation, how would Armenian-American vote? Those
who are staunch Democrats or Republicans have an easy choice to make.
They would vote for their party's candidates, regardless of their
position on issues.
However, those who care about Armenian issues have a somewhat more
difficult task. They could take the position that since Democrats have
not delivered their promises on the Genocide resolution, they would
punish them by voting instead for Republican candidates. The problem
is that traditionally most Republican members of Congress have been
less supportive of the Armenian Genocide issue than Democrats. Thus,
voting for all Republican candidates, while perhaps emotionally
satisfying, will not benefit the Armenian Cause. On the contrary,
Armenians would be helping to elect candidates who are less sympathetic
than the current members of Congress, many of whom are Democrats.
Another option is to sit out the elections completely, since neither
Democrats nor Republicans delivered on Armenian issues when they were
in power. This is not a good option, however, as it would squander
decades of political investment the Armenian community has made in
American civic life.
The option I recommend for the consideration of Armenian-American
voters is none of the above. Do not vote blindly for your party's
candidates, and do not sit out the election.
The optimum choice is to vote for candidates of any party who have
demonstrated a proven track record of active support on Armenian
issues. Those who are reluctant to vote on the basis of a candidate's
stand on Armenian issues should remember that most voters make their
selection based on their perceived self-interest. Jews, Blacks,
Hispanics, Turks and other ethnic groups vote for candidates who
support their causes. Those in high-income brackets typically vote
for candidates who promise to lower their taxes, while poor people
usually support those who favor funding more social services. Why
should Armenians be the exception and shy away from supporting
candidates who favor their issues? Voters make their electoral choices
on the basis of their interests. It is then up to elected officials
to balance the conflicting interests of their constituents.
Armenian-Americans can keep their friends in Congress by re-electing
the 120 Democratic and 36 Republican House members; and 12 Democratic,
2 Republican, and 1 independent Senators all of whom received top
grades from the Armenian National Committee of America. At the same
time, Armenian-Americans can reduce the number of their opponents
in Congress by supporting candidates who are running against the
18 Democratic and 22 Republican House members who received a failing
grade from ANCA. To check the individual record of Members of Congress,
please consult the ANCA's report card by clicking on: www.anca.org.
Finally, everyone must be aware that the day after the Nov. 2 elections
is the unofficial start of the next presidential campaign. In this
regard, it is distressing that Pres. Obama came to Los Angeles
and Glendale last Friday and not a single Armenian protested his
appearance. How could Armenians ignore the fact that the President did
not keep his promise to acknowledge the Armenian Genocide during his
first two years in office? As Pres. Obama was desperately seeking to
convince voters to support Democratic candidates, Southern California's
large Armenian community missed a unique opportunity to show the
President its displeasure before the national media.
By their absence, Armenians sent an ominous message to all candidates:
You can promise anything to Armenians to get their money and votes,
and after the election, you can break your promise with impunity!
Armenians need to wake up from their lethargy. If they want elected
officials to take them seriously, they must reward their political
friends and penalize their opponents!
From: A. Papazian