Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: 'ECtHR Rule Proves Dink Did Not Degrade Turkishness'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: 'ECtHR Rule Proves Dink Did Not Degrade Turkishness'

    'ECTHR RULE PROVES DINK DID NOT DEGRADE TURKISHNESS'

    Today's Zaman
    Sept 16 2010
    Turkey

    Fethiye Cetin, a lawyer representing the family of Turkish-Armenian
    journalist Hrant Dink, who was assassinated in 2007, has said the
    European Court of Human Rights' (ECtHR) ruling is proof that Dink
    did not insult Turkishness.

    The ECtHR ruled on Tuesday that Turkey failed in its duty to protect
    the life of the slain journalist and to effectively investigate his
    murder. In a long-awaited unanimous ruling, the court also included a
    reference to possible links between the murder of Dink and Ergenekon,
    a clandestine terrorist group accused of plotting a military coup
    against the government.

    "The ECtHR has fully comprehended the fact that Dink had been targeted
    since 2004, how the murder had been planned step-by-step since 2004 and
    how the media and the judiciary played a role in this. The court also
    understood the faults of the Trabzon Gendarmerie, the Trabzon police
    and the Ä°stanbul police, which did not take precautions although
    they knew the details of the murder. The court also understood that
    there were no results obtained in the court case in Turkey and ruled
    against Turkey," said Cetin, who spoke at a press conference yesterday.

    Cetin added that if the Dink murder had been solved "dark forces
    within the state" would have come to light. "The state's black box
    will be opened. We have an opportunity from now on to restart the
    investigations and continue to work to find Dink's murderer. This
    will enable us to even the score," she also said.

    Dink was shot dead by an ultra-nationalist teenager outside the
    offices of the Agos newspaper in Ä°stanbul in January 2007. The
    investigation into his murder has stalled as the suspected perpetrator
    and his immediate accomplices have been put on trial, but those who
    masterminded the plot to kill him have yet to be revealed.

    There is a lengthy list of suspicious irregularities in the
    investigation into Dink's murder, including deleted records and
    hidden files suggestive of an attempted police cover up. The Dink
    family's lawyers have said much of the evidence indicates that the
    murder could have been prevented.

    Rober KoptaÅ~_, the new editor-in-chief of Agos, pointed out at the
    press conference that Dink would be 56 years old on Sept. 15 if he
    were alive.

    "The ECtHR's ruling is the result of Dink's application to the court
    eight days before he died because he had exhausted all legal channels
    in Turkey. He was trying to clear the stain that claimed 'he insulted
    Turkishness.' This was very important for him. Unfortunately, the
    Turkish courts wouldn't do what was necessary and ruled in a way that
    resulted in Dink being targeted," he said.

    In the defense's petition to the Strasbourg-based court, the Turkish
    government claimed that Dink had insulted Turkishness and used hate
    speech. The public raised many objections to this defense prepared by
    the Turkish Foreign Ministry. Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said
    he was personally very disturbed by the defense. Justice Minister
    Sadullah Ergin was of a similar opinion. Davutoglu added that he
    learned about the defense only after it was submitted.

    Yesterday, Davutoglu said that they will not object to the ECtHR
    ruling. "No ruling will bring our valuable intellectual back," he
    told reporters in Ankara.

    On Tuesday, Dink's wife, Rakel Dink, said the ECtHR's ruling came as
    if it is was present for Dink just before his birthday. Gathering
    with Cetin and Agos staff in front of Agos and laying red roses on
    the spot where he was shot, Rakel Dink said the sum awarded to the
    Dink family by the court will be donated to organizations that work
    for Armenian education and culture.

    The court requires Turkey to pay 105,000 euros to Dink's family in
    compensation and another 28,595 euros to the court for expenses.

    "Hrant was so uncomfortable with the label given to him because he
    struggled against discrimination and racism throughout his life,"
    she said.

    On Dink's birthday, the International Hrant Dink Award was presented
    for the second time. Every year, the award is presented to two people,
    one from Turkey and one from another country, who work for a world
    free of discrimination, racism and violence, take personal risks for
    their ideals, use the language of peace and, by doing so, inspire and
    encourage others. Last year, Turkish journalist Alper GörmuÅ~_ and
    Israeli journalist Amira Hass became the first recipients of the award.




    From: A. Papazian
Working...
X