Tweet
RUSSIA PROPOSING ITS TROOPS AS KARABAKH 'PEACEKEEPERS'
news.az
Aug 16, 2011
Azerbaijan
News.Az interviews Farhad Mehdiyev, political scientist and chair of
international law at the Caucasus (Kavkaz) University.
What are the prospects for a Karabakh settlement with the current
active mediation of Russia?
Russia is striving to settle this issue in a way that is as favourable
as possible to itself and Armenia, but not Azerbaijan. Russia is really
seeking settlement of this problem as it is aware that time is working
against Armenia, rather than us. The situation in Armenia is sad, the
country's isolation has deepened with the crisis in Russian-Georgian
relations, which is why communications have been cut between Russia
and Armenia.
On the other hand, though Russia is waving its fist, warning the
parties in the Karabakh conflict against thinking of war and reminding
them about the results of the Georgian-Russian war, the fact is that
Moscow, using the fact of its military presence in Armenia, wants to
settle the conflict on terms favourable to itself and Yerevan.
Currently, Moscow has a plan, which it is proposing to the conflict
parties. Under this plan, Russian forces are deployed as peacekeeping
troops in the conflict area. Certainly, they do not guarantee the
inviolability of the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan or ensure
status within Azerbaijan.
How? What does this plan envisage?
Along with deployment of Russian troops in the conflict area, this
Russian option also envisages the return of five of the occupied
districts to Azerbaijan and the determination of the status of
Nagorno-Karabakh in future. It means turning Nagorno- Karabakh into
Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Is it advantageous to us? Clearly not.
It is unclear what will happen in Armenia in a couple of years,
since the country is hit by economic crisis, leading to a decrease
in population, which is why Russia is hurrying to reach a settlement.
Nonetheless, Russia may also be hit by a new, upcoming crisis.
Meanwhile, our position is clear: we are not going to give up an inch
of our land and will provide the highest autonomy to Nagorno-Karabakh.
And we do not want the deployment of any peacekeeping troops there.
Preference is primarily given to countries that do not border on
Azerbaijan and Armenia (this automatically excludes Russia) and who
will be equipped with smaller weapons, rather than tanks and other
hardware. But neither Armenia nor Russia would risk it. I don't think
that the Azerbaijani leadership will accept the Russian provisions.
Moscow must be aware of this, so what is the reason for Russia's
ongoing mediation efforts?
It still hopes that it will implement its plan. Everybody knows that
if Russia had supported us, Armenia would have liberated our lands
in a week. Armenia stays on its feet thanks to the support of Russia.
Medvedev realizes that today it would be more profitable for Armenia
to solve the Karabakh problem, than to solve it, let's say, in two
years' time, when conditions in Armenia will be even worse than now.
On the other hand, Azerbaijan will be stronger. Armenia has relatively
normal relations only with Iran. The main factor is the poor
Georgian-Russian relations, as a result of which Russia has problems,
in particular, with the transfer of heavy equipment to Armenia.
Will the recent aggressive statement by the Armenian president against
Azerbaijan and Turkey, which included claims on their land, make
interaction between Baku and Ankara more effective and make Turkey
think seriously about whether it is worth normalizing relations with
Armenia, which makes open claims on Turkish land?
Yes, this statement should not simply make Turkey more interested
in resolving the Karabakh conflict, but open its eyes to today's
Armenia, how that country's leaders live and clarify whether they
are sincere in their intentions to normalize relations with Turkey. A
statement by the Armenian president clearly shows that Armenia still
has territorial claims on neighbouring states, dreaming of the idea of
"Greater Armenia". Turkey should make a more sober assessment of the
situation in the region.
With this in mind, is there hope of a speedy resolution to the Karabakh
conflict by peaceful means?
There is always a prospect. But the proverb "If you want peace, prepare
for war" still holds true. And Azerbaijan should be guided by these
principles. That is, it should arm itself, should prepare for war, and
this will be our guarantee that our opponents will accept the terms
that we want. It is clear that there is a need to compromise and we
will need to agree on something, but it should be acceptable to us.
So, I think that there are chances for a peaceful settlement, but you
need a strong arm to achieve them without launching missiles anywhere.
news.az
Aug 16, 2011
Azerbaijan
News.Az interviews Farhad Mehdiyev, political scientist and chair of
international law at the Caucasus (Kavkaz) University.
What are the prospects for a Karabakh settlement with the current
active mediation of Russia?
Russia is striving to settle this issue in a way that is as favourable
as possible to itself and Armenia, but not Azerbaijan. Russia is really
seeking settlement of this problem as it is aware that time is working
against Armenia, rather than us. The situation in Armenia is sad, the
country's isolation has deepened with the crisis in Russian-Georgian
relations, which is why communications have been cut between Russia
and Armenia.
On the other hand, though Russia is waving its fist, warning the
parties in the Karabakh conflict against thinking of war and reminding
them about the results of the Georgian-Russian war, the fact is that
Moscow, using the fact of its military presence in Armenia, wants to
settle the conflict on terms favourable to itself and Yerevan.
Currently, Moscow has a plan, which it is proposing to the conflict
parties. Under this plan, Russian forces are deployed as peacekeeping
troops in the conflict area. Certainly, they do not guarantee the
inviolability of the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan or ensure
status within Azerbaijan.
How? What does this plan envisage?
Along with deployment of Russian troops in the conflict area, this
Russian option also envisages the return of five of the occupied
districts to Azerbaijan and the determination of the status of
Nagorno-Karabakh in future. It means turning Nagorno- Karabakh into
Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Is it advantageous to us? Clearly not.
It is unclear what will happen in Armenia in a couple of years,
since the country is hit by economic crisis, leading to a decrease
in population, which is why Russia is hurrying to reach a settlement.
Nonetheless, Russia may also be hit by a new, upcoming crisis.
Meanwhile, our position is clear: we are not going to give up an inch
of our land and will provide the highest autonomy to Nagorno-Karabakh.
And we do not want the deployment of any peacekeeping troops there.
Preference is primarily given to countries that do not border on
Azerbaijan and Armenia (this automatically excludes Russia) and who
will be equipped with smaller weapons, rather than tanks and other
hardware. But neither Armenia nor Russia would risk it. I don't think
that the Azerbaijani leadership will accept the Russian provisions.
Moscow must be aware of this, so what is the reason for Russia's
ongoing mediation efforts?
It still hopes that it will implement its plan. Everybody knows that
if Russia had supported us, Armenia would have liberated our lands
in a week. Armenia stays on its feet thanks to the support of Russia.
Medvedev realizes that today it would be more profitable for Armenia
to solve the Karabakh problem, than to solve it, let's say, in two
years' time, when conditions in Armenia will be even worse than now.
On the other hand, Azerbaijan will be stronger. Armenia has relatively
normal relations only with Iran. The main factor is the poor
Georgian-Russian relations, as a result of which Russia has problems,
in particular, with the transfer of heavy equipment to Armenia.
Will the recent aggressive statement by the Armenian president against
Azerbaijan and Turkey, which included claims on their land, make
interaction between Baku and Ankara more effective and make Turkey
think seriously about whether it is worth normalizing relations with
Armenia, which makes open claims on Turkish land?
Yes, this statement should not simply make Turkey more interested
in resolving the Karabakh conflict, but open its eyes to today's
Armenia, how that country's leaders live and clarify whether they
are sincere in their intentions to normalize relations with Turkey. A
statement by the Armenian president clearly shows that Armenia still
has territorial claims on neighbouring states, dreaming of the idea of
"Greater Armenia". Turkey should make a more sober assessment of the
situation in the region.
With this in mind, is there hope of a speedy resolution to the Karabakh
conflict by peaceful means?
There is always a prospect. But the proverb "If you want peace, prepare
for war" still holds true. And Azerbaijan should be guided by these
principles. That is, it should arm itself, should prepare for war, and
this will be our guarantee that our opponents will accept the terms
that we want. It is clear that there is a need to compromise and we
will need to agree on something, but it should be acceptable to us.
So, I think that there are chances for a peaceful settlement, but you
need a strong arm to achieve them without launching missiles anywhere.