Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BAKU: Azerbaijani Top Official: Double Standards Applied In Nagorno-

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BAKU: Azerbaijani Top Official: Double Standards Applied In Nagorno-

    AZERBAIJANI TOP OFFICIAL: DOUBLE STANDARDS APPLIED IN NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT

    Trend
    Dec 8 2011
    Azerbaijan

    Azerbaijan calls on the OSCE Minsk Group member states to abandon
    double standards in resolving the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Head of
    the Foreign Relations Department at the Azerbaijani Presidential
    Administration Novruz Mammadov told Trend on Thursday. He was
    commenting on the outcome of the OSCE Ministerial Council Meeting
    held in Vilnius.

    He said it is disappointing that some Western countries, OSCE member
    states, international organizations, and co-chair countries, analyzing
    the processes occurring in the 21st century, and considering the
    fact that this conflict is a great threat to the European security,
    approach it within the norms of international law created by them.
    "I think they should give up an offer "agree by yourselves, so that
    we could support you", Mammadov said.

    He said that they should themselves realize that making such proposals,
    supporting the Armenian side by various ways, holding various secret
    negotiations with it, various proposals, bringing together various
    ministers and signing protocols with them, etc., does not help the
    common deal - resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

    Unfortunately, today double standards are evident in many global
    processes, including in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Mammadov said.

    The OSCE Ministerial Council Meeting in Vilnius, held on the
    Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, was to say its say,
    he added.

    "In the document adopted by the organization the co-chairs encouraged
    the parties on resolving the conflict to be more active. And this
    is natural, since the OSCE has a reason for such an appeal. In the
    process of negotiations Azerbaijan has taken all the positive steps
    in the peace talks over the past seven years, whereas, it previously
    hardly agreed to them. After Azerbaijan accepted the Madrid principles
    and defined confidence-building measures in certain circumstances,
    the Armenian side refuses all and does not want to join the confidence
    building measures," Mammadov underlined.

    At the same time, the Vilnius statement should not be the only step,
    he added.

    "OSCE member states, co-chair countries realize that no matter how
    many steps are taken, how many statements are issued and proposals
    are made, Armenia, as you see, does not renounce its evil plans,
    attempting to delay the negotiation process and profit by all of the
    opportunities for this purpose," Mammadov said.

    The joint statement by the OSCE Minsk Group's three co-chair countries
    and the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict parties issued in Vilnius calls for
    continuing negotiations to resolve the conflict within the Minsk Group.

    With regard to the perspectives of the Azerbaijani and Armenian
    presidents' meeting, Mammadov said that it is necessary to the
    negotiation process in any case.

    "It will be more difficult to resolve the conflict without it. Despite
    the fact that Azerbaijan's will in the negotiation process is
    focused on the peaceful settlement of the conflict, the country has
    more patience. The country should return its territories back by
    all means. Now crucial and important task associated with it falls
    on the co-chairs. On the one hand, unresolved conflict imposes great
    responsibility on Armenia. The Armenian leadership in the eyes of the
    world confirms who and what they are. On the other hand, following
    this way, they lead themselves to the edge of a collapse. They have
    only one purpose - to extend their stay in power," Mammadov said.
    Mammadov believes that it is necessary to continue the negotiation
    process in any case.

    However, he expressed concerns over Armenia's possible attempts to
    delay the process.

    "The co-chair countries are experiencing certain processes - financial
    crisis and presidential elections and all these factors may influence
    the negotiations. Azerbaijan is ready to continue the negotiation
    process in all cases," Mammadov said.

    With the hope for the efficiency of the co-chairs' activity, it is
    necessary to take certain steps to organize such a meeting [Azerbaijani
    and Armenian presidents]. From a theoretical point of view, such a
    meeting within an informal CIS summit in Moscow is possible, since
    the two presidents will attend it. There is a need for such a meeting,
    Mammadov underlined.

    "But were the co-chairs able to carry out sufficient work in this
    regard? Is the Armenian side ready to take certain steps to continue
    the negotiations?" he said.

    With regard to possible involvement of new structures and organizations
    to the negotiation process, Mammadov said of course, Azerbaijan has
    not always pleased with the activity of the OSCE Minsk Group, but at
    the same time, one should admit that the co-chairs are also trying
    to address the problem.

    "In fact, the Minsk Group represents diplomats from three countries
    and they do not have such high mandates and resources. I believe
    that the OSCE and these countries' leaders should grant them these
    mandates. On the other hand, it is necessary to slightly change the
    attitude as the conflict is a problem for the European security. As
    you know, after the Second World War, the countries, which are now
    entering this Minsk Group, prepared the so-called mechanism of norms
    of international law to use them in interstate relations.

    Unfortunately, today I observe some indifference to these norms of
    international law and some doubt on the use of international law in
    the activity of international organizations and the co-chairs. And I
    cannot understand it. It is time to abandon the principle of "agree
    by yourselves and we will support". The conflict has broken out, one
    of the conflict sides has some responsibility, another side should
    answer - it is necessary to define and express a position. In this
    case, of course, it will be easy to reach resolution of the conflict,"
    Mammadov said.

    The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in 1988
    when Armenia made territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Armenian
    armed forces have occupied 20 percent of Azerbaijan since 1992,
    including the Nagorno-Karabakh region and 7 surrounding districts.

    Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement in 1994.
    The co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group - Russia, France, and the U.S. -
    are currently holding the peace negotiations.

    Armenia has not yet implemented the U.N. Security Council's four
    resolutions on the liberation of the Nagorno-Karabakh and the
    surrounding regions.

Working...
X