Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ISTANBUL: Is It Possible To Cover up the Ergenekon Case

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ISTANBUL: Is It Possible To Cover up the Ergenekon Case

    Today's Zaman, Turkey
    Dec 23 2011


    Is It Possible To Cover up the Ergenekon Case

    by Huseyin Gulerce


    Some concerns have been raised that indicate the ongoing Ergenekon
    investigation, the cases associated with a recent coup attempt, will
    be covered up and undermined.

    It is even argued that the Justice and Development Party (AK Party)
    administration has been trying to do so. I would agree with the
    concerns but I do not and I cannot believe that the AK Party would
    possibly be involved in an initiative that would undermine its
    prestige and render worthless its hard-earned successes.

    The Ergenekon case is the case of the century. For the first time in
    this country, the guardianship system is being effectively undermined.
    The pro-coup mindset is being questioned and a trial process is taking
    place to remove all junta factions and groups from within the armed
    forces. Since the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP), the illegal
    structure within the state has consolidated its position and power
    through coups and acquired a suitable place in all state institutions,
    including those spelled out in the constitution. This is a powerful
    entity which is stronger and better organized than anybody would
    think. I would even say that only 20 per cent of this entity has been
    removed by the ongoing investigation and other relevant measures.

    We have to understand better what we are dealing with; the entity
    called Ergenekon is organized to lay the ground for coups. In other
    words, it is not the true brain of the illegal structure. Gladio, a
    clandestine Italian organization similar to Ergenekon, is composed of
    P-2 Masonry members, leading figures who previously served as
    president, prime minister, ministers, deputies, judges, businessmen,
    generals and media representatives. From this perspective, ignoring
    the Ergenekon case and arguing that the investigation should stop
    would mean walking into the trap of guardianship.

    True, there might be some concerns and fears that the deep structure
    of Ergenekon is still powerful and influential, and will therefore
    fight back and prevent justice from being served. But I would not
    accept that the AK Party would be so ignorant that it would adopt a
    more lenient approach to weaken strong political will. These
    investigations also cover the Anti-reactionaryism Plan, anti-AK Party
    and Gulen Plan. A few days ago, the AK Party was granted co-plaintiff
    status by the Istanbul 13th High Criminal Court.

    Dozens of trials based on very serious allegations supported by
    official documents and other evidence are under way. The media,
    together with citizens who would like to foster the will to
    democratize, should not allow these trials to be forgotten.

    Everybody should be cautious and careful about something: the circles
    of guardianship are trying to divert public attention with artificial
    moves in the coup trials. Even extensive focus on the recent Armenian
    genocide bill in France should be considered from this perspective.
    This will be followed by other distractions. The AK Party is being
    undermined and different scenarios are being staged to cause tension
    within the party. These plots are attempting to create alienation
    between the government and the people who voted for stability and the
    future of Turkey in recent elections. Scenarios are being drafted to
    distance the president from the prime minister. I am telling you, the
    structure called guardianship is one hundred years old. Its experience
    in staging plots is far more extensive than the experience of any of
    the politicians. The pro-status quo actors are stronger than you would
    think. They are still standing and alive; they are resisting and they
    will remain so.

    Susurluk should not be covered up and unresolved murders should not be
    covered up. We should not remain indifferent to the massacres
    committed in Sivas, Basbaglar, Kahramanmaras and Gazi, nor should we
    ignore other provocative incidents. We should do something to make
    sure that these cases are not annulled because of the statute of
    limitations. We have to hold those who burned inmates alive with
    unusual bombs responsible for what they did and try the commanders who
    gave orders to use chemical weapons to suppress a prison riot in 2000.
    We have to hold those who acted negligently in the martyrdom of our
    sons in the mountains and in unprotected military stations, despite
    having adequate information to prevent this incident.

    Nobody could cover up the Ergenekon cases; you'll see, they cannot be
    covered up.


    From: Baghdasarian
Working...
X