Tweet
WHY CAMERON LET KOUSSA LEAVE THE UK?
press tv
Tue Dec 27, 2011 6:9PM GMT
When high profile leaders or senior ministers are either captured
or defect to another country they are frequently disposed of very
quickly or simply disappear into obscurity.
Have you ever thought why many leaders or senior politicians in
countries that are not so "western friendly" are named as a "War
Criminal" by leaders such as Obama, Cameron, Sarkozy or their partners
in crime the United Nations?
Don't you find it odd that those leaders named above frequently demand
that these war criminals be tried at the International Court of Justice
(ICJ) in The Hague and yet when they are captured suddenly are rushed
through either a local "Kangaroo Court" or are executed/assassinated
upon capture and never reach the ICJ?
Is it possible that this is really what the west want and only use
the war crime ploy as a propaganda tool to wage war? Ever thought of
another aspect to such scenarios whereby the victims, such as Saddam
Hussein or Muammar Gaddafi, knew too much about the deals the west
did with them when they were in power?
Saddam Hussein was a classic case when the west (namely the US and
UK) not only sold him the technology for Weapons of Mass Destruction
but built the Chemical and Biological Laboratories in Iraq that were
later used on the Iranians during the Iraq - Iran War and also on
the Kurds in Halabja. We can also add the nuclear technology that
was also provided by the US/UK and the British made "Super Gun" that
was to be used by Iraq to fire Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)
projectiles into Iran and possibly Israel.
Don't you find our respective governments are so hypocritical when it
comes to ethics and morality? When they accuse Iran of developing
nuclear weapons and yet were providing Saddam Hussein with the
same technology to do the same and also allowed/approved Israel to
develop its own nuclear weapons when they sent their technicians down
to Pelindaba, South Africa and made 10 "Battlefield Ready" nuclear
bombs, and then the UK illegally purchased three of those weapons,
moved them to Oman (in storage) ready to drop on Baghdad if Saddam
Hussein did not toe the line. How's that for double standards?
The final straw was when we found out that our own David Cameron and
Sir Ken Warren were illegally involved in this "under the radar deal"
and allowed the three nukes to be stolen from their insecure compound
in Oman. It was this gross neglect that caused the outcome of the war
with Iraq (the very country they had been supporting for many years
previously! Not to mention the £17.8 million (Tax Payer's Money)
that was siphoned off into the Conservative Party Election Fund!
Maybe now you are starting to understand as to why certain leaders
are abruptly executed and not put through the International Court
of Justice for a war crimes trial that could well reveal the inner
workings and deceit that our leaders have carried out. That is what
happened to Saddam Hussain and that is also why Muammar Gaddafi was
also assassinated unceremoniously. Maybe people like Tony Blair and
Jack Straw etc could throw more light on these terrible atrocities. We
must also keep in mind the Pan Am Lockerbie cover-up.
So let's just return to the case of ex-Libyan Foreign Minister
Moussa Koussa who suddenly turned up on a VIP jet at Farnborough,
was warmly welcomed by the UK Government and then allowed to go to a
Libyan Summit in the Middle East whereupon he never returned. How very
convenient don't you think? Was this another under the table deal for
a so called named "War Criminal?" I really do get an intensely sick
feeling deep inside when I recollect what our ex PM's and government
have done and just how two faced they can become. How dare they point
a finger at Iran or anyone else when they themselves are so guilty of
"War Crimes against Humanity."
Moussa Koussa was once named and shamed by the BBC as follows:
His arrival in the UK on 30 March in apparent flight from the embattled
government of Muammar Gaddafi contrasts sharply with his appointment
as the colonel's de facto ambassador in London in 1979.
The BBC report stated that during an interview with The Times in
1980, he advocated the killing of Libyan dissidents on British soil,
telling the newspaper: "The revolutionary committees have decided to
kill two more people in the United Kingdom. I approve of this"
Having separately professed admiration for IRA militants fighting
the British state, he was expelled from the UK.
As Libya's top spy, he was tasked with bringing a pariah state in
from the cold, and played a key role in negotiating compensation for
the families of victims of the Lockerbie and Niger airliner bombings.
On the eve of the Libyan revolt in February, Mr Koussa's efforts
to rehabilitate Libya internationally appeared to have paid off
handsomely, with oil trade links established across Europe and doors
open to Col Gaddafi in Paris and Rome.
But Mr Koussa's work had also brought him in close contact with
intelligence services in the UK, say correspondents, and he had also
talked on the phone to British Foreign Secretary William Hague -
perhaps explaining why the UK became his port of call once he decided
to leave Libya.
According to an article in Britain's Observer newspaper, a confidential
profile prepared by British intelligence in December 1995 described
him as the head of the "principal intelligence institution in Libya,
which has been responsible for supporting terrorist organisations
and for perpetrating state-sponsored acts of terrorism."
However, he has never been formally charged with any of the attacks
on Western targets attributed to Libya in the 1980s.
So what do you think about this man and should David Cameron and
William Hague have allowed him to leave the country and settle into
a life of absolute luxury in Qatar or placed him before the ICJ in
The Hague?
I also came across this headline which highlighted some other aspects:
Moussa Koussa may be a criminal but he knows where the bodies are
buried. Will he ever be prosecuted?
The report went on to say "The defection of the Libyan Foreign Minister
Moussa Koussa adds some spice and immediacy to current arguments over
universal jurisdiction. There's probably good prima facie evidence that
he was involved in criminal acts in Libya, Britain and other countries
contrary to international law, so securing a warrant for his arrest
would, in theory, seem like a natural step to take. At the moment,
of course, it would be entirely unnatural given that his arrival in
this country was clearly facilitated by the British authorities in
whose hands he securely remains." What was that last comment? "In
whose hands he securely remains."... What a joke!
Moussa Koussa was intentionally moved to avoid any contact with
private individuals or groups who could have possibly extracted
highly sensitive information he had regarding the relationship with
the British. As our government would normally say "It is not in public
interest." Maybe what they meant to have said was that it was "Not in
the interest of British politics, national interest and the interests
of the international, UN-mandated coalition enforcing Security
Council Resolution 1973." It was clear that their own interests into
securing lucrative oil and rebuilding contracts trumped the immediate
application of the principles of international humanitarian law!
Whatever the outcome David Cameron and William Hague have both given
immunity to this apparent war criminal in order to cover up their
own under the table deals? Moussa Koussa had a very long relationship
with the British Government and also our security services.
The British Government has now changed the law to prevent private
individuals from being arrested which basically means that such people
at Israels Tzipi Livni are now free to come and go without any fear
of arrest even though according to our own PM war criminals should
be placed before the International Court of Justice, obviously this
only applies to war criminals that exist in countries that are not
western friendly (Sudan, Syria and Iran). Let's see what happens to
Saif Gaddafi, he certainly knows too much and will never appear in
The Hague!
Peter Eyre - Middle East Consultant
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
press tv
Tue Dec 27, 2011 6:9PM GMT
When high profile leaders or senior ministers are either captured
or defect to another country they are frequently disposed of very
quickly or simply disappear into obscurity.
Have you ever thought why many leaders or senior politicians in
countries that are not so "western friendly" are named as a "War
Criminal" by leaders such as Obama, Cameron, Sarkozy or their partners
in crime the United Nations?
Don't you find it odd that those leaders named above frequently demand
that these war criminals be tried at the International Court of Justice
(ICJ) in The Hague and yet when they are captured suddenly are rushed
through either a local "Kangaroo Court" or are executed/assassinated
upon capture and never reach the ICJ?
Is it possible that this is really what the west want and only use
the war crime ploy as a propaganda tool to wage war? Ever thought of
another aspect to such scenarios whereby the victims, such as Saddam
Hussein or Muammar Gaddafi, knew too much about the deals the west
did with them when they were in power?
Saddam Hussein was a classic case when the west (namely the US and
UK) not only sold him the technology for Weapons of Mass Destruction
but built the Chemical and Biological Laboratories in Iraq that were
later used on the Iranians during the Iraq - Iran War and also on
the Kurds in Halabja. We can also add the nuclear technology that
was also provided by the US/UK and the British made "Super Gun" that
was to be used by Iraq to fire Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)
projectiles into Iran and possibly Israel.
Don't you find our respective governments are so hypocritical when it
comes to ethics and morality? When they accuse Iran of developing
nuclear weapons and yet were providing Saddam Hussein with the
same technology to do the same and also allowed/approved Israel to
develop its own nuclear weapons when they sent their technicians down
to Pelindaba, South Africa and made 10 "Battlefield Ready" nuclear
bombs, and then the UK illegally purchased three of those weapons,
moved them to Oman (in storage) ready to drop on Baghdad if Saddam
Hussein did not toe the line. How's that for double standards?
The final straw was when we found out that our own David Cameron and
Sir Ken Warren were illegally involved in this "under the radar deal"
and allowed the three nukes to be stolen from their insecure compound
in Oman. It was this gross neglect that caused the outcome of the war
with Iraq (the very country they had been supporting for many years
previously! Not to mention the £17.8 million (Tax Payer's Money)
that was siphoned off into the Conservative Party Election Fund!
Maybe now you are starting to understand as to why certain leaders
are abruptly executed and not put through the International Court
of Justice for a war crimes trial that could well reveal the inner
workings and deceit that our leaders have carried out. That is what
happened to Saddam Hussain and that is also why Muammar Gaddafi was
also assassinated unceremoniously. Maybe people like Tony Blair and
Jack Straw etc could throw more light on these terrible atrocities. We
must also keep in mind the Pan Am Lockerbie cover-up.
So let's just return to the case of ex-Libyan Foreign Minister
Moussa Koussa who suddenly turned up on a VIP jet at Farnborough,
was warmly welcomed by the UK Government and then allowed to go to a
Libyan Summit in the Middle East whereupon he never returned. How very
convenient don't you think? Was this another under the table deal for
a so called named "War Criminal?" I really do get an intensely sick
feeling deep inside when I recollect what our ex PM's and government
have done and just how two faced they can become. How dare they point
a finger at Iran or anyone else when they themselves are so guilty of
"War Crimes against Humanity."
Moussa Koussa was once named and shamed by the BBC as follows:
His arrival in the UK on 30 March in apparent flight from the embattled
government of Muammar Gaddafi contrasts sharply with his appointment
as the colonel's de facto ambassador in London in 1979.
The BBC report stated that during an interview with The Times in
1980, he advocated the killing of Libyan dissidents on British soil,
telling the newspaper: "The revolutionary committees have decided to
kill two more people in the United Kingdom. I approve of this"
Having separately professed admiration for IRA militants fighting
the British state, he was expelled from the UK.
As Libya's top spy, he was tasked with bringing a pariah state in
from the cold, and played a key role in negotiating compensation for
the families of victims of the Lockerbie and Niger airliner bombings.
On the eve of the Libyan revolt in February, Mr Koussa's efforts
to rehabilitate Libya internationally appeared to have paid off
handsomely, with oil trade links established across Europe and doors
open to Col Gaddafi in Paris and Rome.
But Mr Koussa's work had also brought him in close contact with
intelligence services in the UK, say correspondents, and he had also
talked on the phone to British Foreign Secretary William Hague -
perhaps explaining why the UK became his port of call once he decided
to leave Libya.
According to an article in Britain's Observer newspaper, a confidential
profile prepared by British intelligence in December 1995 described
him as the head of the "principal intelligence institution in Libya,
which has been responsible for supporting terrorist organisations
and for perpetrating state-sponsored acts of terrorism."
However, he has never been formally charged with any of the attacks
on Western targets attributed to Libya in the 1980s.
So what do you think about this man and should David Cameron and
William Hague have allowed him to leave the country and settle into
a life of absolute luxury in Qatar or placed him before the ICJ in
The Hague?
I also came across this headline which highlighted some other aspects:
Moussa Koussa may be a criminal but he knows where the bodies are
buried. Will he ever be prosecuted?
The report went on to say "The defection of the Libyan Foreign Minister
Moussa Koussa adds some spice and immediacy to current arguments over
universal jurisdiction. There's probably good prima facie evidence that
he was involved in criminal acts in Libya, Britain and other countries
contrary to international law, so securing a warrant for his arrest
would, in theory, seem like a natural step to take. At the moment,
of course, it would be entirely unnatural given that his arrival in
this country was clearly facilitated by the British authorities in
whose hands he securely remains." What was that last comment? "In
whose hands he securely remains."... What a joke!
Moussa Koussa was intentionally moved to avoid any contact with
private individuals or groups who could have possibly extracted
highly sensitive information he had regarding the relationship with
the British. As our government would normally say "It is not in public
interest." Maybe what they meant to have said was that it was "Not in
the interest of British politics, national interest and the interests
of the international, UN-mandated coalition enforcing Security
Council Resolution 1973." It was clear that their own interests into
securing lucrative oil and rebuilding contracts trumped the immediate
application of the principles of international humanitarian law!
Whatever the outcome David Cameron and William Hague have both given
immunity to this apparent war criminal in order to cover up their
own under the table deals? Moussa Koussa had a very long relationship
with the British Government and also our security services.
The British Government has now changed the law to prevent private
individuals from being arrested which basically means that such people
at Israels Tzipi Livni are now free to come and go without any fear
of arrest even though according to our own PM war criminals should
be placed before the International Court of Justice, obviously this
only applies to war criminals that exist in countries that are not
western friendly (Sudan, Syria and Iran). Let's see what happens to
Saif Gaddafi, he certainly knows too much and will never appear in
The Hague!
Peter Eyre - Middle East Consultant
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress