Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Remarks and Response to media questions by Russian FM Lavrov followi

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Remarks and Response to media questions by Russian FM Lavrov followi

    REMARKS AND RESPONSE TO MEDIA QUESTIONS BY RUSSIAN FM LAVROV FOLLOWING TALK WITH FM NALBANDIAN

    States News Service
    July 6, 2011 Wednesday

    SERGEY LAVROV AT JOINT PRESS CONFERENCE FOLLOWING TALKS WITH ARMENIAN
    FOREIGN MINISTER EDWARD NALBANDIAN, MOSCOW, JULY 6, 2011

    The following information was released by the Ministry of Foreign
    Affairs of the Russian Federation:

    I would like to express my satisfaction over the talks with my Armenian
    counterpart Edward Agvanovich Nalbandian. We traditionally exchange
    views and coordinate our positions in a constructive, trustful, allied
    spirit. It was from this vantage point that we reviewed implementation
    of the agreements that had been reached during the regular meetings
    between the Russian and Armenian presidents. We attested to the intense
    nature of bilateral relations, the strengthening of the legal framework
    of our interaction, and we note the steady trend towards enhancement
    and buildup of the economic foundation of our cooperation.

    Trade has regained its pre-crisis level, and it continues to
    grow. Our respective agencies and economic operators are implementing
    progressively an array of large-scale joint investment projects.

    Conducive to Russian-Armenian relations are, of course, humanitarian
    and inter-regional contacts, which traditionally enjoy the widest
    possible support of our citizens.

    To be sure, international issues, the situation in the regions adjacent
    to Russia and Armenia occupy a significant place in our dialogue. We
    spoke for continuing the active participation of our two countries
    in the integration processes in the Commonwealth of Independent
    States area. We confirmed our intention to improve our cooperation
    and coordination both bilaterally and within the framework of the CIS
    and the Collective Security Treaty Organization, in the formats of the
    UN, OSCE, the Council of Europe and other international organizations
    and forums.

    The situation in Transcaucasia has always been a part of our talks.

    Today, we exchanged views on the outcome of the meeting between the
    presidents of Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan, which took place on
    June 24 in Kazan, where issues related to the development of the
    basic principles for settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
    were examined. We attested to the fact that the presidents declared
    in Kazan the harmonization of a number of important issues, helpful
    towards creating the conditions for a final agreement on the basic
    principles, and this work will continue, I expect, in the near future.

    So we looked at, as I said, all key aspects of the agenda of bilateral
    relations and cooperation in the international arena, and agreed on
    a schedule of consultations between our two foreign ministries for
    the second half of the year. We consider it necessary to strengthen
    and develop our interaction.

    Question: Even after the statement made in Deauville on
    Nagorno-Karabakh, in which the Russian, US and French presidents
    indicated that the use of force again would be condemned by the
    international community, urging leaders of both sides to prepare the
    population for peace, not war, threats continue to be heard from
    Baku to use force and prepare for a new war. Azerbaijan virtually
    ignores the opinion of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chair countries,
    opposing itself to the opinion of the international community. How
    could you comment on that?

    In the context of the Kazan meeting, what steps are expected to be
    expeditiously undertaken to advance the negotiation process?

    Foreign Minister Lavrov: I would like to clearly stress right away that
    Russia sticks to the positions set forth in the statement adopted in
    Deauville by the Russian, US and French presidents and also approved
    in the last few years by the presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan with
    the participation of the President of the Russian Federation. These
    documents not only confirm the commitment to a peaceful settlement,
    but also include the agreements on measures to reduce tensions, build
    confidence and prevent incidents along the line of contact. The leaders
    of Armenia and Azerbaijan assumed these commitments, as I said, with
    participation by the President of the Russian Federation. Just the
    other day, regular OSCE monitoring of the situation on the line of
    contact took place. The report presented at Vienna by the mission
    which did the monitoring shows that the number of incidents is
    decreasing. This is a positive trend. We will do everything to make it
    stronger, and to ensure that the agreements I mentioned are respected.

    With regard to further steps, Dmitry Medvedev, as a mediator in the
    negotiation process, and acting with the full support of the US and
    French presidents as co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group, has completed
    analysis of the post-Kazan situation and will soon take his decision
    on further steps.

    Question: (addressed to both ministers): How effective do you think is
    the format of the OSCE Minsk Group? Are there plans to replace it? If
    yes, then by what? Is consideration being given to the possibility
    of participation of regional countries like Turkey and Iran in it?

    Lavrov: The OSCE Minsk Group, formed, as I recall, at the end of the
    1994 Minsk Conference, includes a large number of states. However,
    in recent years, the real tool in the negotiation process is not the
    Minsk Group as such, but its co-chairs. Initially, its composition
    was different - two, then three, and the current co-chairs were not
    in that trio. Now it has become permanent in the current format of
    the three co-chairs, namely Russia, the USA and France. On their
    behalf the special representatives vigorously and routinely work on
    finding solutions to issues in the context not only of the negotiation
    process itself, but also of confidence and security building measures
    on the line of contact. I have already said about it. The co-chairs
    meet regularly with the parties, and visit Baku and Yerevan and
    Stepanakert. They have achieved a very good rapport.

    Two years ago, President Dmitry Medvedev, taking into account the
    special ties of Russia with Armenia and Azerbaijan, on behalf of
    the co-chairs took the initiative to hold in a trilateral format
    (the presidents of Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan), a series of
    consultations with a view to finding concrete agreements on the basic
    principles for a settlement. This initiative was supported.

    Essentially, we have reached the point where decisions must be made.

    I do not think that talk about changing the mediation format,
    especially at this critical phase, will be productive. It only creates
    the illusion that if the format is changed, the content will sort
    itself out. As a rule, ideas to constantly modify the mediation
    format divert attention from the substance. This also applies to
    other situations. For example, there are a lot of plans to change the
    format of Transnistrian conflict settlement. I think this is all the
    work of the devil. The main thing is the political will of the OSCE
    Minsk Group Co-Chairs, recognized by the parties as mediators. And
    that's the basis to proceed.

Working...
X