Tweet
SIS ON VIDEOS OF MARCH 1
http://www.a1plus.am/en/politics/2011/06/17/hatuk-qnnchakan
07:47 pm | Today | Politics
The RA Special Investigative Service has given clarifications regarding
the videos posted on the Internet.
On 16 June 2011, another video showing the mass disturbances that
took place in Yerevan on 1-2 March 2008 was posted on youtube.com.
In addition to previous statements, the RA Special Investigative
Service reaffirms that any information regarding the events that took
place on 1-2 March 2008 is important for the preliminary inquiry.
All videos posted on the Internet to this day, which had previously
not been at the preliminary inquiry body's disposal, have been properly
studied and turned into a topic for investigation.
It is unacceptable to see that the mentioned videos contain false,
groundless commentaries, which pursue political goals and give way
to speculations.
In particular, the video called "Samvel Harutyunyan's
execution...01.03.2008" was posted on youtube.com on 6 June 2011,
but there is no episode showing Samvel Harutyunyan or the fact that
he was murdered. What's more, according to the conclusion of the
forensic medicine examination, Samvel Harutyunan received an injury
by using a sharp object, and died later from overall intoxication of
his organism at the hospital.
As far as the other video posted on youtube.com on 16 June 2011, in
the sense of evidence, it only confirms the facts that have already
been found and confirmed through a preliminary inquiry, according
to which Grigor Gevorgyan's body was transferred to the forensic
medicine examinations center from the shoe repair kiosk located near
the sidewalk in front of the Paronyan and Leo intersection.
Once again, we call on the persons who taped the videos to present
the preliminary inquiry body with the videos in their entirety. This
may be useful for specifying certain facts.
The preliminary inquiry body is also willing to interrogate the authors
of the videos who can clarify the significance of the materials and
evaluate them in terms of evidence.
Incompetent and uninteresting commentaries are only aimed at distorting
the events, the circumstances and mislead the public.
http://www.a1plus.am/en/politics/2011/06/17/hatuk-qnnchakan
07:47 pm | Today | Politics
The RA Special Investigative Service has given clarifications regarding
the videos posted on the Internet.
On 16 June 2011, another video showing the mass disturbances that
took place in Yerevan on 1-2 March 2008 was posted on youtube.com.
In addition to previous statements, the RA Special Investigative
Service reaffirms that any information regarding the events that took
place on 1-2 March 2008 is important for the preliminary inquiry.
All videos posted on the Internet to this day, which had previously
not been at the preliminary inquiry body's disposal, have been properly
studied and turned into a topic for investigation.
It is unacceptable to see that the mentioned videos contain false,
groundless commentaries, which pursue political goals and give way
to speculations.
In particular, the video called "Samvel Harutyunyan's
execution...01.03.2008" was posted on youtube.com on 6 June 2011,
but there is no episode showing Samvel Harutyunyan or the fact that
he was murdered. What's more, according to the conclusion of the
forensic medicine examination, Samvel Harutyunan received an injury
by using a sharp object, and died later from overall intoxication of
his organism at the hospital.
As far as the other video posted on youtube.com on 16 June 2011, in
the sense of evidence, it only confirms the facts that have already
been found and confirmed through a preliminary inquiry, according
to which Grigor Gevorgyan's body was transferred to the forensic
medicine examinations center from the shoe repair kiosk located near
the sidewalk in front of the Paronyan and Leo intersection.
Once again, we call on the persons who taped the videos to present
the preliminary inquiry body with the videos in their entirety. This
may be useful for specifying certain facts.
The preliminary inquiry body is also willing to interrogate the authors
of the videos who can clarify the significance of the materials and
evaluate them in terms of evidence.
Incompetent and uninteresting commentaries are only aimed at distorting
the events, the circumstances and mislead the public.