Tweet
EVERYTHING HAS AN INCUBATION PERIOD
ARMAN GALOYAN
Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/interview21798.html
Published: 19:36:10 - 16/05/2011
Interview with Member of Parliament Vardan Bostanjyan, Bargavach
Hayastan
What is the attitude of the Bargavach Hayastan Party toward the
Congress-government dialogue and is it favorable for the Bargavach
Hayastan Party?
It is a very important issue for our country. If you remember,
when we signed the coalition memorandum we had one purpose ~V to
strengthen the government in its correlation with the world. We signed
the memorandum for this purpose, and it fits in the framework of this
issue. In fact, a considerable part of the society has its approaches
toward acceleration of reforms and solution of a number of unsolved
issues, and presents them to the government. What is bad about the
government~Rs ability to solve these problems? Not only the political
forces but also the members of the society who have common sense must
welcome this dialogue.
And what prevented this dialogue for three years?
It means this problem was not perceived by the solver in this volume
and quality. Everything has a period of incubation. At the moment the
situation of our country, the current developments directly presuppose
these moves.
In other words, does it mean the government has no other way out and
has to take this step?
There is no need to make abrupt statements. The government always
has a solution for every situation. Whether the way out is good or
bad is another issue. The government has an alternative, it tries
to address different issues because these are not the issues of the
government but the country.
In your opinion, what will the dialogue lead to if the main purpose
of the Congress is snap elections?
If they wish to hold snap elections, let them do. However, the snap
elections must have their logic and expediency. In particular, if one
year is left to go before the parliamentary elections, it will not
be logical if we agree on snap elections in the result of the dialogue.
That would boost tensions. If one year is left to go before the
elections, what is the purpose of holding snap elections? I cannot
consider it as highly expedient.
In your opinion, why are the contenders of the third force worried
about the dialogue?
In any case, I am inclined to think that the political forces do not
have the right to harm the stability of our country in pursuing their
minor aims.
ARMAN GALOYAN
Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/interview21798.html
Published: 19:36:10 - 16/05/2011
Interview with Member of Parliament Vardan Bostanjyan, Bargavach
Hayastan
What is the attitude of the Bargavach Hayastan Party toward the
Congress-government dialogue and is it favorable for the Bargavach
Hayastan Party?
It is a very important issue for our country. If you remember,
when we signed the coalition memorandum we had one purpose ~V to
strengthen the government in its correlation with the world. We signed
the memorandum for this purpose, and it fits in the framework of this
issue. In fact, a considerable part of the society has its approaches
toward acceleration of reforms and solution of a number of unsolved
issues, and presents them to the government. What is bad about the
government~Rs ability to solve these problems? Not only the political
forces but also the members of the society who have common sense must
welcome this dialogue.
And what prevented this dialogue for three years?
It means this problem was not perceived by the solver in this volume
and quality. Everything has a period of incubation. At the moment the
situation of our country, the current developments directly presuppose
these moves.
In other words, does it mean the government has no other way out and
has to take this step?
There is no need to make abrupt statements. The government always
has a solution for every situation. Whether the way out is good or
bad is another issue. The government has an alternative, it tries
to address different issues because these are not the issues of the
government but the country.
In your opinion, what will the dialogue lead to if the main purpose
of the Congress is snap elections?
If they wish to hold snap elections, let them do. However, the snap
elections must have their logic and expediency. In particular, if one
year is left to go before the parliamentary elections, it will not
be logical if we agree on snap elections in the result of the dialogue.
That would boost tensions. If one year is left to go before the
elections, what is the purpose of holding snap elections? I cannot
consider it as highly expedient.
In your opinion, why are the contenders of the third force worried
about the dialogue?
In any case, I am inclined to think that the political forces do not
have the right to harm the stability of our country in pursuing their
minor aims.