Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BAKU: Crisis Group: Wrong time to change Minsk Group format

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BAKU: Crisis Group: Wrong time to change Minsk Group format

    Trend News Agency, Baku, Azerbaijan
    Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Business News
    May 28, 2011 Saturday


    Crisis Group: Wrong time to change Minsk Group format

    BY: E.Ostapenko, Trend News Agency, Baku, Azerbaijan


    May 28--AzerbaijanIt is not a time to change OSCE Minsk Group format
    having an EU representative instead of French co-chair, because the
    co-chairs feel that they are very close to the signature of the basic
    principles, International Crisis Group analyst Sabine Freizer
    believes.

    "It is not a time to change OSCE Minsk Group format, because the
    co-chairs feel that they are very close to the signature of the basic
    principles," Crisis Group Europe Program Director Freizer told Trend.

    If an agreement on "basic principles" is not reached in the coming
    months, the international community will have to seriously think about
    efficiency of negotiating format and the chosen strategy, she
    believes. In this context the EU will have a chance to prove itself.

    On Wednesday the EU published a report -- revised European
    Neighborhood Policy (ENP), which is under consideration of the
    European Parliament and other EU authorities.

    The report says that the European Union is ready to enhance EU
    involvement in solving protracted conflicts. The EU must be ready to
    step up its involvement in formats where it is not yet represented,
    such as the OSCE Minsk Group on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, the
    report reads.

    Experts suppose that this may imply the EU involvement in the Minsk
    Group as a co-chair, perhaps, by replacing the French co-chair.

    "There has been a discussion within the European Union about weather
    or not it would useful to have an EU representative instead of French
    co-chair," Freizer said. "But, of course, for that to happen would
    require also the approval by Azerbaijan and Armenia, and other two
    co-chairs" she added.

    It seems highly unlikely at this stage there would be any change of
    the actual co-chair arrangement, Freizer underscored.

    The conflict between the two South Caucasus countries began in 1988
    when Armenia made territorial claims against Azerbaijan. Armenian
    armed forces have occupied 20 percent of Azerbaijan since 1992,
    including the Nagorno-Karabakh region and 7 surrounding districts.

    Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a ceasefire agreement in 1994. The
    co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group -- Russia, France, and the U.S. --
    are currently holding the peace negotiations.

    Armenia has not yet implemented the U.N. Security Council's four
    resolutions on the liberation of the Nagorno-Karabakh and the
    surrounding regions.

    The EU has always stood for the Minsk Group's efforts without being
    directly involved in the conflict resolution.

    "The EU has not come out with a kind of plan, strategy on how it could
    address Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, especially if there is an agreement
    on basic principles," she said. She believes that the EU should think
    about it and suggest a concrete plan.

    Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian President Serzh
    Sargsyan have been holding the periodic meetings since June 2008 to
    agree the positions to resolve the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Despite
    this, the basic principles have not been agreed yet.

    It is expected that the presidents' next meeting will take place in June.

    Freizer also believes that if there isn't an agreement on the basic
    principles soon, then it is possible that there will be changes.

    "Until Kazan meeting it is clear that the Minks Group will stay as it
    is," she said.




    From: A. Papazian
Working...
X