Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Dink's Murderer Recalled At Istanbul Demonstration Against Ruling In

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dink's Murderer Recalled At Istanbul Demonstration Against Ruling In

    DINK'S MURDERER RECALLED AT ISTANBUL DEMONSTRATION AGAINST RULING IN RAPE CASE

    epress.am
    11.07.2011

    Demonstrators gathered in Istanbul's Taksim Square on Sunday were
    demanding a just ruling in the case of N.C., a 13-year-old girl
    who was "cajoled into sexual intercourse with 26 individuals in
    exchange for money". In their slogans demonstrators mentioned Ogun
    Samast, the 17-year-old nationalist charged with the 2007 murder of
    Armenian-Turkish journalist and editor Hrant Dink.

    Demonstrators were shouting, "If Ogun Samast was a child, then what
    is N.C.?"

    Recall, Samast was tried by Istanbul's Heavy Juvenile Criminal
    Court which sentenced him to nearly 23 years in prison, taking into
    consideration the fact that he was a minor when he committed the crime.

    Demonstrators on Sunday were demanding the court amend its earlier
    verdict in the N.C. case. Recall, the 14th Criminal Chamber of the
    Supreme Court of Appeals on Oct. 31 upheld a decision by the Mardin
    1st High Criminal Court to give 26 suspects, tried for raping N.C,
    a minor, in the southeastern province of Mardin, sentences ranging
    from one to six years in a trial earlier this year. The local court
    had justified its decision based on N.C.'s alleged "consent" during
    sexual intercourse.

    N.C. went to the Mardin Police Department in 2002 to file a criminal
    complaint against the men. Some of the accused are civil servants,
    soldiers, a village head and teachers, and they have claimed they
    have been slandered and unjustly accused. N.C. is now 19.

    Last week, Turkey's ruling Justice and Development Party (AK Party)
    Adana deputy Omer Celik harshly criticized the Supreme Court of Appeals
    ruling on his Twitter feed, defining it as a "crime against humanity"
    and asked: "What can the judiciary protect, if it is unable to protect
    a 13-year-old innocent child?"

Working...
X