Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: Minority Community Granted Authority Over Foundations

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: Minority Community Granted Authority Over Foundations

    MINORITY COMMUNITY GRANTED AUTHORITY OVER FOUNDATIONS

    Today's Zaman, Turkey
    Nov 15 2011

    Turkey's Directorate General for Foundations (VGM) has accepted an
    application to open a foundation filed by the Beyoglu Central Greek
    High School, making the foundation the first non-Muslim minority
    foundation established in the country in 88 years.

    Under the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne, signed between Turkey and six other
    states following the Turkish War of Independence, 162 non-Muslim
    foundations were allowed. The Beyoglu Central Greek High School
    becomes the 163rd faith-based foundation in Turkey, and the first
    one established after the signing of Lausanne, raising hopes that
    new Jewish and Armenian foundations could be next.

    VGM President Adnan Ertem in an interview with Today's Zaman
    noted that organizations of non-religious communities were given
    "foundation" status by the Treaty of Lausanne. He said three
    foundations were excluded at the time due to a legal technicality,
    adding that the recent decision to grant the Beyoglu Central Greek
    High School foundation status had solved the problem, saying the two
    other foundations -- one a Jewish and one an Armenian organization --
    would now be able to get foundation status. This will bring the total
    number of non-Muslim minority foundations in Turkey to 165.

    The rights of minorities in Turkey were guaranteed by the Treaty of
    Lausanne. Minorities in Turkish law, based on the treaty, are defined
    as non-Muslim communities. In 1935 Turkey adopted its current Law
    on Foundations, and in 1936 asked its minority groups to declare
    their assets. Those who gave declarations are considered non-Muslim
    communities, and their organizations have been given foundation
    status. This allows them to enjoy the privilege of registering all
    facilities they listed in their declarations in 1936 as their own
    property, regardless of the name of the person on the original deed.

    Shortly, the declarations gave them the opportunity to enter their
    property into the national deed registry.

    But as Ertem explains, the three foundations, which were not given
    foundation status by the Treaty of Lausanne, were not recognized as
    foundations or registered despite having turned in declarations in
    1936. These communities were recognized as legal persons, but not as
    foundations. The directorate's latest decision solves this problem,
    which will allow them to register their immobile assets.

    "In the next stage, we will evaluate the situation of the two
    foundations that belong to Jewish and Armenian groups. These two are
    also communities accepted as communities that have traditionally
    settled in Turkey. For this reason, we see no problem at all in
    transforming the status of any immobile property registered under
    these communities' organizations to that of a foundation."

    He said there were objections to this approach, but noted that the
    directorate's main criterion was the long-time presence of these
    communities, adding that all three communities were recognized
    as minorities under Lausanne. "It is out of the question for those
    groups that don't have a long-term presence in Turkey to be granted
    legal personality or given foundation status."

    Ertem also noted that according to a law passed in August that returns
    some of the immobile property confiscated from non-Muslim groups,
    they expect to see about 700 applications. Since the law was passed
    in August, only the Galata Greek Foundation has applied to get back
    one immobile property item, but said they expected the total to be 700.

    "There were 347 items of property that we had earlier refused to
    return. We will now return them all, but there are other edifices that
    they claim belong to them but fail to present any documentation. For
    example, they say there was a store in Fatih, without presenting any
    address or deeds. We cannot take such applications into consideration
    for review."


    From: Baghdasarian
Working...
X