Tweet
IRANIAN NUCLEAR PROBLEM LIKE PRE-CONDITION FOR CREATION OF THE "RULED CHAOS" IN THE REGION
by David Stepanyan
arminfo
Tuesday, November 15, 17:11
Against the background of significant worsening of situation around
Iranian nuclear problem, British, Israeli and American mass media
have recently started speaking about the forthcoming beginning of the
military campaign against Iran via the missile and bomb attacks on the
nuclear facilities of Iran. Incidentally, direct neighbors of Iran,
Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia prefer to keep silent and assume a
mask that they are practically concerned about the possible war in
the region. If in this context Tbilisi's and Baku's motives are quite
clear because of availability of the American servicemen at their
territory, it is at least surprising why there is no reaction from the
side of Yerevan, which is a great friend of Iran and a guarantor of
security of Nagornyy Karabakh Republic. In general, the situation is
threatening to put the whole region in the so called "ruled chaos",
which will allow the USA to more gain a foothold in the region.
The pre-condition of such an option is the information published
in The New-York Times, according to which American military bases
deployed in Azerbaijan will be used during the operation of the
"allies" against Iran, though Azerbaijan's authorities refuse such
development of events. Moreover, the USA also hopes to use Georgian
airports, military bases and even new concrete highways, the building
of which was financed by the USA, for attacking Iran. As for the last
bellicose statements by high-rank officials of Israel, they make us
suppose that Iranian targets may be attacked form the territory of
Israel too. So, after the Iraqi and Libyan scenario we are becoming
witnesses of a new scenario, which may become the beginning of at
least local war. But Iran cannot be compared with Iraq or Libya, as
unlike the Arabs, the majority of Iranians do not want to swallow the
hook of the Western propaganda in the form of "democratization". The
IAEA report, which says that Teheran has been drawing out a nuclear
bomb, has "suddenly" and simultaneously appeared in the American,
British and Israeli press and proved once again the necessity to
attack Iran...However, these publications did not reflect Teheran's
resoluteness not to step back from its nuclear programme. Moreover,
deputy commander of Iranian General Headquarters, General Masud Jazaeri
said that if Israel attacks nuclear facilities of Iran, the latter
is ready to destroy an important nuclear center of the enemy in Dimon.
However, there is also another option of possible development of events
around the Iranian nuclear programme - the peaceful one, voiced by US
President Barack Obama. He said in particular, that the USA, China and
Russia have been striving not to let gaining of the nuclear weapon by
Iran. The USA prefers diplomatic talks in the matter. As for Russia,
it prefers to keep silent yet, having limited itself by the statement
made by Foreign minister Sergey Lavrov according to which the military
blow of Israel upon Iran would be a great mistake. At the same time,
today it is not clear how to make Iran refuse the intention of getting
nuclear weapon and rule out the military ways, especially against the
background of the situation that there has been no chance, and will
hardly be, that Russia, the USA, France, China, Germany and the Great
Britain will reach any success in the talks with Iran. As for Iran,
it is not going to stop its nuclear programme or refuse its military
component, at least stemming from total instability that covered
Near and Middle East thanks to the efforts of the USA as well. For
this reason, the dialogue with the "six", the relations with Israel
and the USA will probably develop in the context which they used to
develop earlier. The decision adopted by the foreign ministers of
the EU on 14 November to support harshening of sanctions regarding
Iran, is also evidence of implementation of such a scenario, which
they decided to delay till 1 December when the next session of the
EU foreign ministers will be held... At present the ministers rule
out military interference in the affairs of Teheran. And Germany's
Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle even said that Germany is not
going to take part in any discussions on possibility of attacking
Iran in the context of its nuclear problem.
The warning of the leader of Pentagon Leon Panetta to the top
leadership of the USA about the unpredictable consequences of the
battle actions against Iran is also evidence of the "peaceful" option.
He said that they may have serious effect at US forces in the region.
It is obvious that he first of all meant the American contingent
deployed in Afghanistan, being the key target for Iran if the USA
attacks its territory.
At the same time, it is obvious that Israel will not manage to quickly
hit all the targets without the support of Pentagon and other allies.
So for the USA and its allies, the point is not in expediency of
another adventure, this time against Iran, but in its wish how to do
it by the foreign hands preventing losses in its own of forces... In
general, the war against Iran finds room in the American conception on
creation of the so called "ruled chaos" at the global level. According
to some trustworthy sources, the war against Iran has been already
scheduled for 2012, but the date is still secret. Today one thing is
clear - the war against Iran will blow up the whole region which is
far from being stable. The actions initiated by the West may possibly
become the catalyst element for de-frosting of some frozen conflicts,
and first of all the Karabakh conflict. Taking into consideration,
that Nagornyy Karabakh is at the border to Iran, such a prospect looks
rather realistic, finding room in the American theory on creation of
the "ruled chaos". Just thanks to the chaos, which the USA may seed in
the region not controlled by it yet, Washington may reach its desired
goal with a help of the situation when one beats the bush while another
catches the birds. And the last "revolutions" in Libya, Egypt, Tunis
and the forthcoming revolution in Syria prove that the best of all.
From: Baghdasarian
by David Stepanyan
arminfo
Tuesday, November 15, 17:11
Against the background of significant worsening of situation around
Iranian nuclear problem, British, Israeli and American mass media
have recently started speaking about the forthcoming beginning of the
military campaign against Iran via the missile and bomb attacks on the
nuclear facilities of Iran. Incidentally, direct neighbors of Iran,
Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia prefer to keep silent and assume a
mask that they are practically concerned about the possible war in
the region. If in this context Tbilisi's and Baku's motives are quite
clear because of availability of the American servicemen at their
territory, it is at least surprising why there is no reaction from the
side of Yerevan, which is a great friend of Iran and a guarantor of
security of Nagornyy Karabakh Republic. In general, the situation is
threatening to put the whole region in the so called "ruled chaos",
which will allow the USA to more gain a foothold in the region.
The pre-condition of such an option is the information published
in The New-York Times, according to which American military bases
deployed in Azerbaijan will be used during the operation of the
"allies" against Iran, though Azerbaijan's authorities refuse such
development of events. Moreover, the USA also hopes to use Georgian
airports, military bases and even new concrete highways, the building
of which was financed by the USA, for attacking Iran. As for the last
bellicose statements by high-rank officials of Israel, they make us
suppose that Iranian targets may be attacked form the territory of
Israel too. So, after the Iraqi and Libyan scenario we are becoming
witnesses of a new scenario, which may become the beginning of at
least local war. But Iran cannot be compared with Iraq or Libya, as
unlike the Arabs, the majority of Iranians do not want to swallow the
hook of the Western propaganda in the form of "democratization". The
IAEA report, which says that Teheran has been drawing out a nuclear
bomb, has "suddenly" and simultaneously appeared in the American,
British and Israeli press and proved once again the necessity to
attack Iran...However, these publications did not reflect Teheran's
resoluteness not to step back from its nuclear programme. Moreover,
deputy commander of Iranian General Headquarters, General Masud Jazaeri
said that if Israel attacks nuclear facilities of Iran, the latter
is ready to destroy an important nuclear center of the enemy in Dimon.
However, there is also another option of possible development of events
around the Iranian nuclear programme - the peaceful one, voiced by US
President Barack Obama. He said in particular, that the USA, China and
Russia have been striving not to let gaining of the nuclear weapon by
Iran. The USA prefers diplomatic talks in the matter. As for Russia,
it prefers to keep silent yet, having limited itself by the statement
made by Foreign minister Sergey Lavrov according to which the military
blow of Israel upon Iran would be a great mistake. At the same time,
today it is not clear how to make Iran refuse the intention of getting
nuclear weapon and rule out the military ways, especially against the
background of the situation that there has been no chance, and will
hardly be, that Russia, the USA, France, China, Germany and the Great
Britain will reach any success in the talks with Iran. As for Iran,
it is not going to stop its nuclear programme or refuse its military
component, at least stemming from total instability that covered
Near and Middle East thanks to the efforts of the USA as well. For
this reason, the dialogue with the "six", the relations with Israel
and the USA will probably develop in the context which they used to
develop earlier. The decision adopted by the foreign ministers of
the EU on 14 November to support harshening of sanctions regarding
Iran, is also evidence of implementation of such a scenario, which
they decided to delay till 1 December when the next session of the
EU foreign ministers will be held... At present the ministers rule
out military interference in the affairs of Teheran. And Germany's
Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle even said that Germany is not
going to take part in any discussions on possibility of attacking
Iran in the context of its nuclear problem.
The warning of the leader of Pentagon Leon Panetta to the top
leadership of the USA about the unpredictable consequences of the
battle actions against Iran is also evidence of the "peaceful" option.
He said that they may have serious effect at US forces in the region.
It is obvious that he first of all meant the American contingent
deployed in Afghanistan, being the key target for Iran if the USA
attacks its territory.
At the same time, it is obvious that Israel will not manage to quickly
hit all the targets without the support of Pentagon and other allies.
So for the USA and its allies, the point is not in expediency of
another adventure, this time against Iran, but in its wish how to do
it by the foreign hands preventing losses in its own of forces... In
general, the war against Iran finds room in the American conception on
creation of the so called "ruled chaos" at the global level. According
to some trustworthy sources, the war against Iran has been already
scheduled for 2012, but the date is still secret. Today one thing is
clear - the war against Iran will blow up the whole region which is
far from being stable. The actions initiated by the West may possibly
become the catalyst element for de-frosting of some frozen conflicts,
and first of all the Karabakh conflict. Taking into consideration,
that Nagornyy Karabakh is at the border to Iran, such a prospect looks
rather realistic, finding room in the American theory on creation of
the "ruled chaos". Just thanks to the chaos, which the USA may seed in
the region not controlled by it yet, Washington may reach its desired
goal with a help of the situation when one beats the bush while another
catches the birds. And the last "revolutions" in Libya, Egypt, Tunis
and the forthcoming revolution in Syria prove that the best of all.
From: Baghdasarian