Tweet
Dashnaks, Aram I and Aznavour
Naira Hayrumyan
Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/comments23689.html
Published: 14:47:26 - 08/10/2011
Perhaps the largest units of the Armenian Diaspora have recently
criticized the policy of the Armenian government.
In early September the Central Committee of the ARF Dashnaktsutyun of
West America issued a statement blaming Serzh Sargsyan for having the
economy dominated by monopolists and oligarchs, fostering migration
and other deadly sins.
On September 17 Catholicos Aram I of the House of Cilicia addressed
the Armenia-Diaspora forum and mentioned that the country is emptying
and the government encourages this by mismanagement. `Decay,
corruption, economic prosperity of the minority and the poverty of the
intelligentsia, writers, teachers, people in general, require reforms.
The church cannot remain indifferent to such unhealthy phenomena,'
Aram I announced.
Another pillar of the Armenians worldwide, Charles Aznavour, announced
that the present government of Armenia does not foster the development
of the country. Aznavour's words expressed a deep pain. He said that
in Armenia farmers have to live half-hungry on their own land while
the mafia rules Armenia.
Charles Aznavour, Aram I, the ARF Dashnaktsutyun leadership were not
announced persona non grate in Armenia. However, their words were not
heard. Like the oppositions words, which alarms growing emigration,
injustice, monopolies.
A few days ago Levon Ter-Petrosyan reminded that democracy is not a
possibility to form a good government, it is a mechanism of removing a
bad government. Thus, there is no democracy in Armenia because the law
does not provide a mechanism of recalling members of parliament, let
alone the president. There is not a mechanism of announcing snap
elections, while it is even more difficult to speak about the
tradition of resignation in Armenia, as well as the influence of
public opinion on the behavior of those in government.
In brief, the representatives of the Armenian government do not even
deny that there is no democracy in Armenia, and it is still on the way
for establishment. It is a good opportunity not to obey public
opinion. These people are wearing a shield and pay no attention to
what others say about them. Even if those are Aram I and Charles
Aznavour.
From: Baghdasarian
Naira Hayrumyan
Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/comments23689.html
Published: 14:47:26 - 08/10/2011
Perhaps the largest units of the Armenian Diaspora have recently
criticized the policy of the Armenian government.
In early September the Central Committee of the ARF Dashnaktsutyun of
West America issued a statement blaming Serzh Sargsyan for having the
economy dominated by monopolists and oligarchs, fostering migration
and other deadly sins.
On September 17 Catholicos Aram I of the House of Cilicia addressed
the Armenia-Diaspora forum and mentioned that the country is emptying
and the government encourages this by mismanagement. `Decay,
corruption, economic prosperity of the minority and the poverty of the
intelligentsia, writers, teachers, people in general, require reforms.
The church cannot remain indifferent to such unhealthy phenomena,'
Aram I announced.
Another pillar of the Armenians worldwide, Charles Aznavour, announced
that the present government of Armenia does not foster the development
of the country. Aznavour's words expressed a deep pain. He said that
in Armenia farmers have to live half-hungry on their own land while
the mafia rules Armenia.
Charles Aznavour, Aram I, the ARF Dashnaktsutyun leadership were not
announced persona non grate in Armenia. However, their words were not
heard. Like the oppositions words, which alarms growing emigration,
injustice, monopolies.
A few days ago Levon Ter-Petrosyan reminded that democracy is not a
possibility to form a good government, it is a mechanism of removing a
bad government. Thus, there is no democracy in Armenia because the law
does not provide a mechanism of recalling members of parliament, let
alone the president. There is not a mechanism of announcing snap
elections, while it is even more difficult to speak about the
tradition of resignation in Armenia, as well as the influence of
public opinion on the behavior of those in government.
In brief, the representatives of the Armenian government do not even
deny that there is no democracy in Armenia, and it is still on the way
for establishment. It is a good opportunity not to obey public
opinion. These people are wearing a shield and pay no attention to
what others say about them. Even if those are Aram I and Charles
Aznavour.
From: Baghdasarian