Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Eastern Partnership And Prospects Of

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Advantages And Disadvantages Of Eastern Partnership And Prospects Of

    ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF EASTERN PARTNERSHIP AND PROSPECTS OF "EUROPEAN-STYLE REMODELING" OF ARMENIA
    by David Stepanyan

    arminfo
    Tuesday, October 25, 14:08

    The third summit of Eastern Partnership member countries will take
    place in the second half of 2013 over the period of Lithuania's
    chairmanship in the European Union. When analyzing the achievements and
    events held under the given policy, Armenia and other member countries
    do not cease wondering what this policy provides to 6 countries of the
    post-Soviet space. This question is especially relevant in the light
    of Moscow's obvious negative attitude towards the given initiative
    of the EU.

    Actually, it is not surprising given the fact that it was initiated by
    Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski with participation of Sweden,
    and sought to be an instrument of rapprochement between the EU and
    6 republics of the former USSR: Ukraine, Moldova, Belarus, Georgia,
    Armenia and Azerbaijan. It is noteworthy that as a responsive measure,
    Russia seeks to expand its presence in all the 6 republics, first of
    all, via increasing its economic penetration and establishing close
    ties between the Russian political parties and the parties representing
    the political elite of the countries involved in Eastern Partnership...

    Disadvantages...

    Among the disadvantages of the policy, the analytical communities of
    the 6 countries, first of all, point out that the summits of Eastern
    Partnership take place exclusively during the chairmanship of East
    European countries in the EU. This is direct evidence of a low
    interest of West Europe in this initiative. Thus, the first summit
    was held in Prague in May 2009 over the term of the Czech Republic's
    chairmanship in the EU, and many experts considered it to be a failure
    due to the low level of representatives of the leading EU states in
    it. The second summit took place in Warsaw on September 29-30 during
    Poland's chairmanship and was marked by the scandal with Belarus,
    whose president, Alexander Lukashenko, was not invited to the summit
    at all. This was qualified in Belarus as one more manifestation of
    "the Western policy of double standards".

    At the same time, the attitude of the EU itself towards Eastern
    Partnership is far from being unambiguous. For instance, Poland,
    Sweden and the Czech Republic have a quite serious attitude to the
    Eastern Partnership policy, but as a structure, the EU is interested
    in saving the common currency - euro, rather than in this program.

    Although they in the EU generally sympathize Armenia, there are
    countries in Eastern Partnership, which leave Armenia behind: the
    matter concerns Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova. This especially concerns
    the Association Agreement. Ukraine is of great significance in the EU,
    and this is proved by the fact that the EU is going to allocate 600
    mln EUR for the promotion of bilateral cooperation with Ukraine before
    2014. This amount is half of all the money reserved for the bilateral
    cooperation of all the 6 member states of Eastern Partnership.

    Advantages...

    However, if one soberly analyzes the situation, all these reproaches
    prove to be unconvincing, taking into account that today Eastern
    Partnership is the only real instrument of rapprochement between 6 CIS
    states and Europe. One of the main advantages of Eastern Partnership
    is the impetus that the initiative puts in the process of development
    of relations between the East European countries and the countries
    involved in the program. In case of Armenia, this is especially
    displayed by the example of Poland. Thus, the agenda of Armenia-Poland
    cooperation will shortly be formulated in the process of European
    integration within the frames of Eastern Partnership. On October 17
    Head of the National Security Bureau of Poland Stanislaw Koziej, who
    paid an official visit to Yerevan, expressed Poland's willingness to
    support the ongoing reforms in Armenia in every possible way.

    In general, the Armenian-Polish political dialogue is at a quite
    high level, which is proved by the frequent bilateral high-level
    visits of the recent years, first and foremost, by the official visit
    of Polish President Bronislaw Komorowski to Armenia in July. In the
    meantime, one should note that despite the absence of French President
    Nicolas Sarkozy from the latest summit of Eastern Partnership, which
    demonstrates, to put it mildly, the not so serious attitude of France
    to this program, it is first of all France that expresses Armenia's
    interests in the EU. For instance, France considers Armenia to be a
    clubman moving towards the EU at rapid pace. For its part, Armenia has
    repeatedly confirmed its adherence to European values. The republic
    has already done certain work within Eastern Partnership frames to
    simplify the visa regime and create a free trade zone. In this matter,
    Armenia enjoys the advisory support of the EU experts.

    Eastern Partnership and Russia

    Meanwhile, to all appearances, Europe is by no means going to create a
    new focus of tension with Russia by means of Eastern Partnership. This
    is proved by the 24 May 2010 proposal of Poland to set up "a group
    of friends" within Eastern Partnership with participation of Russia.

    However, Moscow displayed no serious attitude to this proposal.

    Instead, it started seriously considering the initiative of Russian
    Prime Minister Vladimir Putin to create a Eurasian economic union
    with the countries of the former USSR. The economic expansion in
    the CIS countries also gained momentum. For instance, over 1999-2010
    the Russian investments in small Armenia amounted to $3 bln. After
    construction of the new nuclear power unit in Metsamor, the total
    volume of Russian investments will reach about $5 bln. Today there are
    about 1400 Russian-Armenian companies in Armenia with joint capital.

    So, the result of Russia's efforts is obvious. Thus, Russia is
    going to assert its interests in the CIS states. In the meantime,
    the risks connected with the reshuffle within Medvedev-Putin tandem
    do not concern the post-Soviet space. Even if the power is changed
    in Russia tomorrow, one should not expect Moscow to refuse its
    national interests in the post-Soviet space, because the foreign
    political vector of Moscow generally undergoes no changes from the
    power replacement. Consequently, in any scenario of developments, the
    objective geopolitical interests of Russia, which do not depend on the
    leader's surname, should be taken into account by Moscow's partners.

    Foreign political preferences

    At present, the political leaders of Russia have numerous supporters
    in Armenia, first of all, in the Prosperous Armenia (PA) coalitional
    party. In this context, the participation of Prosperous Armenia Leader
    Gagik Tsarukyan in the 12th congress of United Russia Party in Moscow
    is not accidental. The main partner of Prosperous Armenia in Russia
    is the pro-Putin United Russia Party, and the party thinks that the
    Armenian-Russian relations will only benefit from the re-election of
    Putin as Russian president. The PA Leader Gagik Tsarukyan, an oligarch,
    the owner of Multi Group concern in Armenia, has already stated that
    Putin's presidency will only have a positive effect on Armenia both in
    development of Armenian-Russian relations and in terms of the Karabakh
    peace process. The leaders of smaller political parties of Armenia
    also come out with statements, and for some reason, they do this on
    behalf of Armenian people. For instance, Leader of the Democratic
    Party of Armenia Aram Sargsyan thinks that "the Armenian people want
    to be pro-Russian in the country's foreign relations". If in case
    of the Republican Party of Armenia led By Armenian President Serzh
    Sargsyan, the cooperation with the Medvedev administration does not
    seem to be unambiguous, Prosperous Armenia does its best for further
    development of the ties with Russian political parties, first of all,
    with United Russia.

    Prospects

    The abovementioned contrast is most vividly observed when analyzing
    the foreign political course of the Armenian incumbent president's
    team. When considering the latest steps of Serzh Sargsyan in his
    skilled maneuvering between the West and Russia, the heel towards
    Europe is getting more and more tangible. Moreover, the expected
    conclusion is that Sargsyan is even going to make a "European-style
    remodeling" in the republic, which will cover a wide range of domestic
    and foreign political problems. This remodeling looks quite relevant
    against the background of strengthening Armenia-EU cooperation within
    Eastern Partnership, which will become one of its key instruments.

    At the same time, the matter does not concern radical revision of
    Armenia's foreign political priorities. To all appearances, the
    Armenian president realized the necessity of profound political and
    institutional reforming of the public life of the country. For this
    and for constructiveness in the Armenian-Turkish process, Sargsyan
    enjoys the support of Europe and the US. Despite the numerous
    visits to Moscow, one cannot say that he enjoys similar support in
    the Kremlin. In the meantime, the talk about the "European-style
    remodeling" is more than the real steps. This allows the oppositional
    analysts to speak of imitation of these processes. The answer to
    this question can be given only by the second presidential term of
    Sargsyan, because it is now more than clear whose interests Gagik
    Tsarukyan expresses in Armenia. Therefore, it is obvious today that
    the assumption of power by Tsarukyan and the ex-president of Armenia,
    Putin's friend Robert Kocharyan will inevitably become a step back for
    Armenia, because populism has never been a basis for "European-style
    remodeling" and the related reforms, including the unpopular ones.



    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X