Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

It's Better To Conduct Endless Negotiations

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • It's Better To Conduct Endless Negotiations

    "IT IS BETTER TO CONDUCT ENDLESS NEGOTIATIONS"
    by Artem Kobzev

    WPS Agency
    DEFENSE and SECURITY
    August 10, 2011 Wednesday
    Russia

    DMITRY MEDVEDEV WILL TRY TO RESET THE KARABAKH REGULATION AT A
    MEETING WITH ILHAM ALIYEV; Dmitry Medvedev will meet with President of
    Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev in Sochi. The main topic of the meeting will
    be regulation of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. If the negotiations
    take place successfully, meeting of Medvedev and President of Armenia
    Serzh Sergsian will probably be the next step and it may be followed
    by a trilateral summit.

    Dmitry Medvedev will meet with President of Azerbaijan Ilham
    Aliyev in Sochi. The main topic of the meeting will be regulation
    of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. If the negotiations take place
    successfully, meeting of Medvedev and President of Armenia Serzh
    Sergsian will probably be the next step and it may be followed by a
    trilateral summit.

    Last time, Medvedev, Sargsian and Aliyev met at the end of June in
    Kazan where there was another round of trilateral negotiations. The
    summit in the capital city of Tatarstan had no results and the
    parties did not sign the document that had to become the "road map"
    of regulation in Nagorno-Karabakh. It is based mostly on the so-called
    Madrid principles proposed by the co-chair countries of the Minsk OSCE
    group (Russia, France, US) as an algorithm for solving of the problem
    of Nagorno-Karabakh: Azerbaijan is to be given the districts of the
    so-called security zone around Nagorno-Karabakh, an international
    peacekeeping operation should begin in the conflict zone, refugees
    receive a possibility to come back and afterwards there is a "legally
    binding referendum" about the status of Nagorno-Karabakh.

    Both parties believe that some of the clauses of the document
    contradict each other and their signing in such form may trigger a
    serious outburst of public discontent in both countries and hence
    the summit in Kazan has ended without sensations.

    Literally on the next day after completion of the summit Armenia and
    Azerbaijan exchanged accusations blaming each other for the failure
    of the negotiations. According to Foreign Minister of Armenia Edvard
    Nalbandian, the parties failed to come to an agreement because
    at the latest moment "Baku represented about ten amendments." His
    Azerbaijani colleague responded that it were Armenians who demanded
    too many concessions." Aliyev added fuel to the fire personally. He
    said that occupation of 20% of the Azerbaijani land by Armenia was
    a temporary phenomenon and that territorial integrity of Azerbaijan
    would be restored by "any method."

    According to sources of Moskovskie Novosti, big expectations from
    the meeting in Kazan and its follow-up failure were explained by the
    fact that Russian and Armenian diplomats overestimated the scale of
    the political compromises with which Baku could agree. Medvedev had
    to correct mistakes of the subordinates urgently. He sent a letter
    to Aliyev and Sargsian where he outlined his vision of the Karabakh
    regulation. According to available information, the Russian President
    considered some arguments of the Azerbaijani party sensible. So,
    it was not surprising that Azerbaijan was the first to respond to
    this signal. In the middle if July, Foreign Minister of Azerbaijan
    Elyar Mamedyarov arrived to Moscow and handed the response message
    from Aliyev over to Sergei Lavrov. Along with this, he refused to
    comment on its content.

    The Armenian party was even more verbose. Armen Arzumanian, press
    secretary of the Armenian President, said, "The response letter of
    President of Armenia Serzh Sargsian was already sent to President of
    Russia Dmitry Medvedev."

    Alexei Vlasov, general director of the information and analytical
    center of the MGU for studying of the post-Soviet space, said, "There
    is information that the Azerbaijani party has agreed with the proposals
    fixed in the letter of Medvedev. Along with this, it is not known what
    Sargsian has answered to his message." Vlasov believes that that is
    why the Russian President meets with the Azerbaijani colleague first
    and not with the Armenian one. According to the political scientist,
    it has been said earlier that the next trilateral meeting will take
    place only after Moscow receives guarantees that all parties of the
    conflict are ready to sign a document that it has been planned to sign
    in Kazan. If negotiations with Aliyev take place successful, meeting
    of Medvedev and Sergsian should become the next step according to the
    logic of the political process. It will be followed up by a trilateral
    meeting at the end of August or at the beginning of September and
    signing of the corrected and modified "road map." Vlasov concludes,
    "If this is so, it is possible to say that the parties reach a new
    round of the negotiation process."

    Other experts, for example, invited researcher of the center of
    strategic and international research in Washington Sergei Markedonov,
    believe that after a certain surge in activeness in the attempts of
    regulation of the problem of Nagorno-Karabakh in the trilateral format
    under the aegis of Moscow a new dead end starts appearing finally.

    First, this happens because the parties (and Nagorno-Karabakh) are
    not ready to agree with the entire set of proposals of the "road map."

    Second, even if it is signed there will be inevitable difficulties
    in real implementation of its paragraphs.

    In his interview on August 4 Medvedev reiterated that events of
    August of 2008 should become a lesson for Armenia and Azerbaijan. The
    President said, "It is better to conduct endless negotiations about
    the fate of Nagorno-Karabakh than to spend these five military days."

Working...
X