Tweet
PRO-GOVERNMENT NEWSPAPERS IN ARMENIA CRITICAL OF US HAD SARGSYAN'S SUPPORT: WIKILEAKS
epress.am
09.02.2011
Two days before the May 12, 2007 parliamentary election in Armenia,
US Charge d'Affaires Anthony Godfrey sent a confidential cable to the
US State Department where he notes the rise of criticism of the US by
two pro-government newspapers, Hayots Ashkar and Golos Armenii. The
cable was released by Wikileaks on Aug. 30, 2011.
"In the weeks leading up to the May 12 parliamentary election, two
pro-government newspapers regularly published articles highly critical
of the United States and other Western missions and NGOs. Hayots
Ashkhar and Golos Armenii newspapers have denounced the United
States for interfering in Armenia's internal affairs, claimed that
international organizations such as the National Democratic Institute
(NDI) are promoting a 'color revolution,' and criticized a British
official for his comments during a private meeting with an opposition
leader. The newspapers, both rumored to receive funding from the head
of the governing Republican Party, Prime Minister Serzh Sargsyan,
had been less critical of the United States in recent years, but
appear to have returned to their previous stances. This may well
reflect the ruling elite's discomfort with the success of election
support programs," reads the summary of the cable.
Godfrey notes that both publications were at one time considered to
be anti-US, but had "gradually moderated such criticism"; however, it
seems that in recent months, both newspapers seem to have resumed "the
role of 'attack dogs,' presumably on behalf of the ruling party elite."
Godfrey notes that the criticism has focused largely on work by
Western missions and international agencies in connection with the
upcoming elections.
"This shift began in January, 2007, when both papers published
remarkably similar articles that characterized the US government's
well-publicized Democracy Support Program, to assist Armenia to hold
free and fair elections, as interference in Armenia's internal affairs.
[...]
"The newspapers' change in attitude towards the United States appears
to be linked largely to the upcoming parliamentary elections and
concern that foreign election support might hurt the chances of
the governing parties. The rumored link between the newspapers and
Prime Minister Serzh Sargsyan is noteworthy, especially as Sargsyan
has recently been making public statements on not only the need for
free and fair elections, but also asserting, 'I don't remember a
case of political pressure from the United States.' It is judged by
most observers that neither of these newspapers could have published
these strong criticisms without at least the tacit concurrence, if
not the explicit direction, of Armenia's ruling elite. Consequently,
we cannot but believe that these anti-US screeds demonstrate that key
Armenian leaders are discomforted by the success of our democratization
programs," writes Godfrey.
epress.am
09.02.2011
Two days before the May 12, 2007 parliamentary election in Armenia,
US Charge d'Affaires Anthony Godfrey sent a confidential cable to the
US State Department where he notes the rise of criticism of the US by
two pro-government newspapers, Hayots Ashkar and Golos Armenii. The
cable was released by Wikileaks on Aug. 30, 2011.
"In the weeks leading up to the May 12 parliamentary election, two
pro-government newspapers regularly published articles highly critical
of the United States and other Western missions and NGOs. Hayots
Ashkhar and Golos Armenii newspapers have denounced the United
States for interfering in Armenia's internal affairs, claimed that
international organizations such as the National Democratic Institute
(NDI) are promoting a 'color revolution,' and criticized a British
official for his comments during a private meeting with an opposition
leader. The newspapers, both rumored to receive funding from the head
of the governing Republican Party, Prime Minister Serzh Sargsyan,
had been less critical of the United States in recent years, but
appear to have returned to their previous stances. This may well
reflect the ruling elite's discomfort with the success of election
support programs," reads the summary of the cable.
Godfrey notes that both publications were at one time considered to
be anti-US, but had "gradually moderated such criticism"; however, it
seems that in recent months, both newspapers seem to have resumed "the
role of 'attack dogs,' presumably on behalf of the ruling party elite."
Godfrey notes that the criticism has focused largely on work by
Western missions and international agencies in connection with the
upcoming elections.
"This shift began in January, 2007, when both papers published
remarkably similar articles that characterized the US government's
well-publicized Democracy Support Program, to assist Armenia to hold
free and fair elections, as interference in Armenia's internal affairs.
[...]
"The newspapers' change in attitude towards the United States appears
to be linked largely to the upcoming parliamentary elections and
concern that foreign election support might hurt the chances of
the governing parties. The rumored link between the newspapers and
Prime Minister Serzh Sargsyan is noteworthy, especially as Sargsyan
has recently been making public statements on not only the need for
free and fair elections, but also asserting, 'I don't remember a
case of political pressure from the United States.' It is judged by
most observers that neither of these newspapers could have published
these strong criticisms without at least the tacit concurrence, if
not the explicit direction, of Armenia's ruling elite. Consequently,
we cannot but believe that these anti-US screeds demonstrate that key
Armenian leaders are discomforted by the success of our democratization
programs," writes Godfrey.