Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ethnic cleansing by any name is immoral

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ethnic cleansing by any name is immoral

    Sentinel & Enterprise (Fitchburg, Massachusetts)
    August 17, 2011 Wednesday

    Ethnic cleansing by any name is immoral

    by Don Long is pastor of Faith Christian Church in Fitchburg.


    This summer, as 22 of us from the Fitchburg area traveled in Israel,
    we were struck by the fact that throughout Israel there are "Arab"
    towns and "Jewish" towns existing side by side. No talk in Israel
    about "removing the Arabs." Full citizenship rights and opportunities
    are given to all Arabs living in Israel. And then we traveled to what
    the world calls the "West Bank" -- it is biblically and historically
    "Judea and Samaria." We visited many Jewish communities there,
    numbering anywhere from hundreds to thousands of residents. And we
    wondered why Jews and Arabs cannot likewise live together here? That's
    not a question to the Jew -- it's a question to the Arab -- and a
    question to the world. The answer is unfortunately quite clear: They
    want a nation of their own -- and they want it free from all Jews!

    Ethnic cleansing is the removal of an entire ethnic population,
    forcing them to leave one territory and move to another. From the
    International War Crimes Tribunal, The Hague, in the case against
    Slobodan Milosevic, ethnic cleansing was said to be a criminal act and
    its executors criminals. In the 1990s this term was widely used in the
    press to describe what was taking place in Yugoslavia, where Croatians
    were being driven out by Serbians, and likewise Serbians by Croatians.

    Ethnic cleansing typically uses intimidation, forced expulsion and/or
    killing of an undesired ethnic group, as well as the destruction or
    removal of key physical and cultural elements, including places of
    worship, cemeteries, works of art and historic buildings. In 1992, the
    U.N. General Assembly condemned ethnic cleansing as a crime against
    humanity.

    So why would the U.N. even consider granting nationhood status to the
    Palestinian Authority when that same entity has made it clear that all
    the Jewish communities, some 300,000 people, must be removed from
    Judea and Samaria? Can you imagine the reaction in the world if the
    government of Israel said that in order for a two-state solution to
    take place, all of the more than 1 million Arab Muslims living in
    Israel must be forced to move to the new Palestinian state? Protests
    would erupt around the world; our college campuses would be sites of
    protest gatherings; our State Department and president would
    immediately condemn such a statement. Yet when Abbas and the
    Palestinian Authority very clearly say that all Jews must be removed
    -- not a word of condemnation. Where is the moral outrage?

    Unfortunately, ethnic cleansing has all too frequently been a part of
    human history. The Romans expelled all the Jews from Palestine in A.D.
    70. In 1290, King Edward I expelled all Jews from England. In 1492,
    King Ferdinand expelled all Jews from Spain. During World War I,
    Turkey was responsible for the ethnic cleansing -- some would say
    genocide -- of the Armenians. In World War II the Nazi government
    began with ethnic cleansing, and ended with genocide in the Holocaust
    and the extermination of more than 6 million Jews. During the
    partition of India, 5 million Hindus and Sikhs fled from what became
    Pakistan into India, and more than 6 million Muslims fled from what
    became India into Pakistan. Our own nation was guilty of ethnic
    cleansing when in 1830 President Andrew Jackson signed the Indian
    Removal Act -- forcing all the Cherokee Indians in the South to be
    marched off to tribal lands in the Midwest.

    In the years after the nation of Israel was established, more than 1
    million Jews were forced to leave their homes in Arab states, so that
    most Arab nations are now "Judenrein" -- a reference to Hitler's
    attempt to remove all Jews from the population. And now many in the
    world want to establish yet another Arab nation that will be free of
    Jews! Gaza is now free of all Jews -- all 9,000 of them removed. The
    result -- a terrorist camp raining rockets into the sovereign nation
    of Israel on a regular basis. Remove all the Jews from Judea and
    Samaria? The very mention of that by the Palestinian Authority should
    cause a swift and clear response from the civilized nations of the
    world. If that is your world view, you are disqualified from being a
    member of the civilized nations of the world.

    And this is quite apart from the discussion as to whether the
    Palestinians have a "right" to the land to begin with. Despite what
    Peter Tocci and others believe, history is not on their side. True,
    the British did promise land to the Arabs -- but they already gave it.
    Three-fourths of the British Mandate was given by the British, without
    any international approval, to form the nation of Jordan. Jordan is
    the homeland for the Palestinians. People should read "From Time
    Immemorial" -- research by Joan Peters, who began with one point of
    view but whose research shows that the so-called Palestinians have no
    claim to the land. That might open the door for a great public debate.

    But to the point of this letter: Ethnic cleansing was, is, and always
    will be immoral. If we as a people -- and our government leaders, no
    matter what their political persuasion is -- cannot be clear on that,
    then we have no moral right to think we can be a nation leading the
    world. You want to be a nation free of one ethnic group? Then you
    cannot be a nation!




    From: A. Papazian
Working...
X