Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lawsuit Against Turkey May Result in Favor of Armenian Plaintiffs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lawsuit Against Turkey May Result in Favor of Armenian Plaintiffs

    Friday, September 2nd, 2011 | Posted by admin

    LAWSUIT AGAINST TURKEY MAY RESULT IN FAVOR OF ARMENIAN PLAINTIFFS


    LOS ANGELES, CA - In light of the recent decision to return religious
    institutions belonging to minority citizens of the Ottoman Empire in
    Turkey, three descendants of Armenians owning property on what is now
    the Incirlik Air Base in Turkey filed a lawsuit in the California
    Superior Court on Dec. 15, 2010.

    The suit, filed by Attorney Vartkes Yeghiayan, on behalf of Plaintiffs
    Alex Bakalian, Anais Haroutunian and Rita Mahdessian, has been brought
    against the government of the Republic of Turkey, the Ziraat Bank and
    the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey.

    The Plaintiffs assert that four parcels of land belonging to their
    grandparents, Ottoman citizens Dikran Effendi and Kalina Hatun, were
    unjustly confiscated in the Incirlik district and put under the
    control of the Ziraat Bank after 1915. As compensation, they are
    demanding 496 dunams (496,000 square meters) of land or $63.9 million
    for lands and apartments built on the lands.

    A communiqué sent by the U.S. Department of State, Ministry of Foreign
    Affairs, on June 20 officially urged the Republic of Turkey to defend
    itself.

    In the Diplomatic Note, the State Department explains, that `according
    to U.S. laws you are obliged to defend yourself, since you are the
    defendant in a case. Therefore, we ask you to hire an attorney in the
    U.S. The U.S. is ready to help you in this regard. If you don't send a
    defense within 60 days, there is a possibility that the court might
    decide against you by default.'

    The Turkish government ignored the suit and failed to file an answer
    resulting in a decision to be made by the court in absentia. As a
    result, the compensation may amount to $100 million. In defense of the
    seriousness of the issue, the Banks in the case have hired a law firm
    in the U.S. to represent them. They were granted an extension to Sept.
    19 to prepare for court proceeding


    http://massispost.com/?p=4265

Working...
X