Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: Why Is It Necessary To Insist On Reducing Ties To Zero?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: Why Is It Necessary To Insist On Reducing Ties To Zero?

    WHY IS IT NECESSARY TO INSIST ON REDUCING TIES TO ZERO?
    by Hasan Cemal

    Milliyet
    Sept 3 2011
    Turkey

    >From the beginning, Turkey has been right about the Mavi Marmara and
    Gaza issue and it has to continue putting on the pressure. Nonetheless
    would it have been wiser to do this in a more cool-headed manner, by
    spreading it to a wider timetable or by reducing the relations to zero?

    When Israel launched the Mavi Marmara attack in the beginning of June
    last year I wrote the following in this column:

    "Israel does not surprise. It continues with attacks that ignore the
    conscience of humanity and that make the humanity's heart bleed. It
    continues to defy peace. It does not give up independent aggressive
    policies that add fuel to the flames. It is impossible to interpret
    in any other way the massacre conducted by the Israeli commandos in
    the Turkish-flagged Mavi Marmara ship which carried humanitarian aid
    to Gaza. Unfortunately this is the painful reality on which the Prime
    Minister Netanyahu-Foreign Minister Lieberman understanding is based
    in Israel."

    I still stand behind these words today.

    It is impossible to say that Israel's harsh stand in the
    apology-compensation-Gaza blockade triangle has changed in its essence
    during the past one year.

    As a matter of fact, when announcing yesterday [ 2 September] that the
    ties between Turkey and Israel have been reduced to the lowest level
    - in other words have been de facto cut off - and that the military
    ties between the two countries have been suspended, Foreign Minister
    Ahmet Davutoglu drew attention to the following points:

    "The crime committed by Israel is not a simple one. Attacking civilians
    in a boat in an aid convoy and killing unarmed persons by shooting
    them repeatedly in the neck constitute a crime of humanity.

    It committed a war crime in international water. We held a total of
    four rounds of talks at different times and we voiced our demands. Our
    demands are known and unless these demands are met our ties with
    Israel will not normalize."

    >From Ankara's standpoint the last straw that broke the camel's back
    was the report of the UN investigation panel that was leaked to the New
    York Times yesterday. Referring to this issue, President Abdullah Gul
    voiced Ankara's reaction by saying "from our standpoint [the report]
    is void."

    There is no need to beat around the bush.

    By reducing the diplomatic ties between the two countries to zero
    the tension between the two countries will seriously rise.

    As of now both countries will exert utmost efforts for hurting
    each other.

    And Israel has long arm where this issue is concerned. Israel has
    manoeuvre fields such as damaging Turkey's ties with the United States,
    meddling with issues that concern Turkey including the 1915 [Armenian
    genocide claims] in the US Congress, and inciting the Kurdish issue
    and the PKK and it may hurt Turkey.

    There is no doubt that it is impossible to belittle Turkey's power.

    Primarily it is right.

    In addition to being right in the Mavi Marmara and Gaza blockade
    issues, Turkey's "stock exchange value" in the international arena
    has risen especially in terms of the US Administration due to issues
    such as the Arab Spring, Syria, Libya, and Iran.

    Furthermore Turkey is also right in the reaction that it has displayed
    thus far.

    However it is necessary to add a "but."

    To be right is not everything in international relations.

    You may be right but you may eventually lose a case or you may
    encounter difficulties at the most unexpected time.

    Do you want to know what I am trying to say?

    Yes, Turkey should continue to put on the pressure in the Mavi Marmara
    and Gaza issues, regarding which it is right.

    Nonetheless would it have been wiser to do this in a more cool-headed
    manner, by spreading it to a wider timetable or by reducing the
    relations to zero? Only time will tell what the correct answer is.

    Answer to Question from Foreign Ministry

    In response to the question that has formed in the corner of my mind a
    high-level official from the Foreign Minister said to me the following
    yesterday evening:

    "We have waited for exactly 15 months. We have held talks with Israel
    for nine months. We were extremely constructive. Israel, however,
    expected us to forget about the attack. If you do not adopt such a
    stand, no one will take notice of you. Maybe, as of now, they will
    seriously sit at the table. They have adopted an irrational stand
    that cannot be explained logically from the very beginning. We have
    constantly given them chances for the normalization of the ties. We
    were the victim in this incident. Despite this we were the side that
    showed them understanding. Nine months have passed in this manner.

    They have requested six more months. We constantly tried to go back to
    friendship, but they created hostility. You will arbitrarily attack
    a ship in international waters, outside you territorial waters, you
    will kill 10 of our citizens, including one cerebral death, everything
    that should be done in response will be done, but you, as Israel,
    will continue with your intransigence. Under such circumstances,
    we have no choice other than saying 'Go to hell'."

    These were the words of the high-level official from the Foreign
    Ministry.

    We hope that Israel will soon come to its senses.

Working...
X