Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Israel Needs A New Kurdish Policy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Israel Needs A New Kurdish Policy

    ISRAEL NEEDS A NEW KURDISH POLICY
    Evelyn Gordon

    Commentary
    Sept 12 2011

    Israel quite properly moved quickly to quash reports that in response
    to worsening ties with Turkey, it planned to start helping the PKK.

    Jerusalem has tried for years to persuade the world there's no such
    thing as a "good" terrorist organization, and adopting a pet terrorist
    group of its own would completely destroy this argument.

    Moreover, Turkey would justifiably consider it an act of war, just
    as Israel does when other countries arm Hamas or Hezbollah, and the
    last thing Israel needs is for its cold war with Turkey to degenerate
    into a hot war.

    But there's no reason whatsoever for Israel not to launch a diplomatic
    campaign on behalf of the Kurds, focusing on both their justified
    demand for independence and Ankara's gross human rights violations
    against Kurds in both Turkey and Iraq (where Turkey frequently bombs
    Kurdish areas). It should also start lobbying for international
    recognition of the Armenian genocide, and urge American Jewish
    organizations to do so as well.

    For years, the alliance with Turkey confronted Israel with an
    uncomfortable choice between morality and realpolitik. It was always
    problematic for a country founded by survivors of history's worst
    genocide to tacitly acquiesce in denying another people's genocide,
    especially since the world's indifference to the Armenian genocide
    is thought to have encouraged Hitler's (correct) belief that he
    could massacre Jews with impunity. It was also problematic for a
    country founded on a stateless, persecuted people's yearning for a
    home of their own to tacitly acquiesce in the suppression of another
    stateless, persecuted people's identical yearning -especially after
    Israel began supporting the Palestinians' demand for statehood, which
    is incomparably less justified than that of the Kurds. (Unlike Kurds,
    Palestinians are ethnically and linguistically indistinguishable from
    their Arab neighbors, and have suffered far less: For instance, they
    were never barred from using their own language, as Turkey's Kurds
    were, and many fewer have been killed). One can question whether
    Jerusalem was right to have made these compromises, but successive
    governments all concluded that given Israel's nasty neighborhood,
    the benefits of the Turkish alliance were too great to forgo.

    Now, however, this alliance is dead, and it is unlikely ever to revive:
    Ankara's state-sponsored anti-Semitism (see here, here, or here,
    for instance) is indoctrinating young Turks to loathe Israel, while
    the Turkish opposition's main gripe against the government's Israel
    policy seems to be that it isn't anti-Israel enough. After a UN inquiry
    largely exculpated Israel's raid on last year's flotilla to Gaza, for
    instance, the opposition lambasted the government for enabling such a
    "pro-Israeli" report and for not suspending all trade with Israel.

    So, for the first time in decades, morality and realpolitik align
    rather than conflict: By doing what is right on the Kurdish and
    Armenian issues, not only would Israel not lose anything, but it would
    bolster its own deterrence by showing Turkey cannot wage diplomatic
    warfare against it with impunity. In short, it's a win-win situation.

    All that's needed is for Israel's government to finally face the fact
    the Turkish alliance is history.

    http://www.commentarymagazine.com/2011/09/12/israel-new-kurdish-policy/

Working...
X